This paper explores aspects of professional culture in dentistry that may impact on the delivery of equitable dental services in the future. After 2009, commissioners will have to ration National Health Service budgets for health services and dentistry will compete with other services. Therefore, the delivery of equitable oral health services may be an advantage in the case for dentistry and subsequent funding. We report our opinions on the changes currently occurring in dentistry in England and Wales, based on the evidence available to us from the literature, and consider the risks and opportunities that have arisen.
GallagherJE.Wanless: a public health knight. Securing good health for the whole population. Community Dent Health.2005;22:66–70.
2.
HartJT.The inverse care law. Lancet.1971;1:405–12.
3.
JonesCM.Capitation registration and social deprivation in England. An inverse ‘dental’ care law? Br Dent J.2001;190:203–6.
4.
MaunderP, LandesDP, SteenN.The equity of access to primary dental care for children in the North East of England. Community Dent Health.2006;23:116–9.
5.
BloomfieldK.Fundamental Review of Dental Remuneration. London: Department of Health; 1992.
6.
Audit Commission.Dentistry: Primary Dental Care Services in England and Wales. Northampton: Belmont Press; 2002.
7.
Department of Health.NHS Dentistry: Options for Change. London: DH; 2002.
8.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).Dental Recall. Recall Interval Between Routine Dental Examinations. Clinical Guideline 19. London: National Health Service; 2004.
9.
National Audit Office/Department of Health.Reforming NHS Dentistry: Ensuring Effective Management of Risks. National Audit Office Report (HC 25, 2004–05). London: The Stationery Office; 2004.
10.
LucarottiS.Attendance interval: six months or two years?Dent Rev.2003–2004:13–5.
11.
GryttenJ.Models for financing dental services. A review. Community Dent Health.2005;22:75–85.
12.
Department of Health.Improving Oral Health With the New Dental Contract. London: DH; 2007.
13.
CalnanM, DickensonM, ManleyG.The quality of general dental care: public and users’ perceptions. Qual Health Care.1999;8:149–53.
14.
Taylor-GoobyP, SylvestorS, CalnanM, ManleyG.Knights, knaves and gnashers: professional values and private dentistry. J Soc Pol.2000;29:375–95.
15.
DownerMC, DruganCS, BlinkhornAS.Dental caries experience of British children in an international context. Community Dent Health.2005;22:86–93.
16.
MurrayJJ, PittsNB.Trends in oral health. In: PineCM, editor. Community Oral Health. Oxford: Wright; 1997.
17.
DugmoreCR.The 80–20 phenomenon (80:20 distribution of caries): myth or fact?Br Dent J. 2006;201:197–8.
18.
TickleM.The 80:20 phenomenon: help or hindrance to planning caries prevention programmes?Community Dent Health. 2002;19:39–42.
19.
ChestnuttIG, ThomasDR, PatelR, TreasureET.Perceptions and attitudes to a fundamental reform of General Dental Services in Wales. Prim Dent Care.2007;14:13–8.
20.
RenshawJ.After the first 125 years of the BDJ where might clinical dentistry be heading?Br Dent J. 2005;196:331–7.
