Drug Profile of Adult Patients Attending Five General Dental Practices in Merseyside

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the drug profile of patients attending general dental practice and to assess the significance of this for the provision of dental care.

Design and setting

Prospective study of adult patients attending five general dental practices in Merseyside.

Materials and methods

Patients were questioned about prescribed medication. The data were analysed to assess any potential oral side-effects, pertinent drug interactions, or potential complications of dental treatment.

Results

A total of 1103 patients were recruited; of these, 287 (26%) were taking systemic medication.

Conclusion

Approximately a quarter of dental patients attending for routine dental care were taking prescribed medication. The majority of these drugs have significant implications for the general dental practitioner.

Keywords

Prescribed Medications Interactions Patients General Dental Practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Miller

, Kaplan

, Guest

, Cottone

JA.

Documenting medication use in adult dental patients: 1987–1991. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:40–8.

Sreebny

LM.

Saliva in health and disease: an appraisal and update. Int Dent J 2000;50:140–61.

Meechan

JG.

Polypharmacy and dentistry: 1. Introduction and interactions with local anaesthetics and sedative drugs.

Dent Update 2002;29:325–30.

Felder

, Millar

, Henry

RH.

Oral manifestations of drug therapy. Special Care Dentist 1988;8:119–24.

Baker

, Levy

, Chrischilles

EA.

Medications with dental significance: usage in a nursing home population. Special Care Dentist 1991;11:19–25.

Field

, Longman

, Fear

, Higham

, Rostron

, Willetts

, . Oral signs and symptoms as predictors of salivary gland hypofunction in general dental practice. Prim Dent Care 2001;8:111–4.

Field

, Fear

, Higham

, Ireland

, Rostron

, Willetts

, . Age and medication are significant risk factors for xerostomia in an English population, attending general dental practice. Gerodontology 2001;18:21–4.

British National Formulary (BNF 44) 2002. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002.

Dental Practitioners’ Formulary 2002–2004. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002.

10.

Medicines Compendium 2003. Epsom: Datapharm Communications; 2003. (Electronic Medicines Compendium at www.medicines.org.uk)

11.

Sweetman

, editor. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. 33rd ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002.

12.

Seymour

RA.

Oral and dental disorders. In: Davies

, editor. Textbook of Adverse Drug Reactions. 5th ed. London: Chapman and Hall Medical; 1998.

13.

Stockley

, editor. Stockley's Drug Interactions. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002.

14.

Meechan

, Seymour

Drug Dictionary for Dentistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.

15.

Seymour

, Thomason

, Nolan

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and their implications for the dental surgeon. Br Dent J 1997;183:214–8.

16.

Scully

, Azul

, Crighton

, Felix

, Field

, Porter

SR.

Nicorandil can induce severe oral ulceration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:189–93.

17.

Sreebny

, Schwartz

SS.

A reference guide to drugs and dry mouth. 2nd ed. Gerodontology 1997;14:33–47.

18.

Hart

, Scianni

, Conkin

JE.

Current medications of a dental patient population. J Tenn Dent Assoc 1990;70:15–7.

19.

Moorthy

AP.

Coghlan K, O'Neal R. Drug therapy among dental outpatients.

Br Dent J 1984;156:261–5.

20.

Porter

, Scully

Adverse drug reactions in the mouth. Clin Dermatol 2000;18:524–32.

21.

Bradley

, Bond

Increasing the number of drugs available over the counter: arguments for and against. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:553–6.