Until recently removable prostheses were the only form of treatment for those who had lost all or most of their natural teeth, while for the partially dentate, dentures were perceived as a poor substitute for a fixed restoration, lacking stability and prone to increasing oral disease. Subsequent studies demonstrated the functional benefits of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and how they could be used with minimal oral harm.
• EspositoM, HirschJM, LekholmU, ThomsenP.Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology.Eur J Oral Sci1998;106:527–51.
2.
• EspositoM, HirschJM, LekholmU, ThomsenP.Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II). Etiopathogenesis.Eur J Oral Sci1998;106:721–64.
3.
• SennerbyL, RoosJ.Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants. A review of the literature.Int J Prosthodont1998;11:408–20.
4.
• LeaoA, SheihamA.Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living. J Dent Res1995;74:1408–13.
5.
• SladeGD.Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol1997;25:284–90.
6.
• SladeGD.Assessing change in quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol1998;26:52–61.
7.
• AllenPF, WitterDF, WilsonNH, KäyserAF.Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Oral Rehabil1996;23:481–5.
8.
• KäyserAF.How much reduction of the dental arch is functionally acceptable for the ageing patient. Int Dent J1990;40:183–8.
