The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship of history of gang involvement to engagement in Therapeutic Community (TC) treatment. Residents (N = 222) at two Daytop facilities completed a survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, prior gang involvement and multiple aspects of TC functioning. Residents with prior gang involvement (21%) were younger and less educated than those without prior gang involvement. Although gang involved residents were more likely to achieve a high work role status in the program they scored lower on multiple indicators of engagement in treatment including acceptance of Daytop philosophy and TC clinical progress.
O'BrienW and DevlinC. 1997. “The therapeutic community”. In Substance Abuse A Comprehensive Textbook., 3rd ed., Edited by: LowinsonJ, RuizP, MillmanR and LangrodJ. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams and Wilkins.
FaganJ. 1989. The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs. Criminology, 27(4): 633–669.
5.
KnoxG. 2005. The problem of gangs and security threat groups in American prisons today: recent research findings from the 2004 prison gang survey, National Gang Crime Research Center. Available at http://www.ngcrc.com/corr2004.htmlAccessed July 18, 2005
6.
KnoxG. 1999. A national assessment of gangs and security threat groups (STGs) in adult correctional institutions: results of the 1999 adult corrections survey, National Gang Crime Research Center. Available at http://www.ngcrc.com/ngcrc/page7.htmAccessed July 21, 2003
7.
De LeonG. 2000. The Therapeutic Community Theory, Model, and Method, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
8.
DerogatisL R. 1993. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual., 3rd Edition, Baltimore, Maryland: National Computer Systems, Inc.
9.
BussA H and DurkeeA. 1957. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J Consult Psychol, 21(4): 343–349.
10.
MetrikinA, GalanterM, DermatisH and BuntG. 2003. Somatization, anxiety and depression in a drug free residential therapeutic community. Am J Addict, 12(1): 60–70.
11.
KresselD, De LeonG, PalijM and RubinG. 2000. Measuring client clinical progress in therapeutic community treatment. The therapeutic community Client Assessment Inventory, Client Assessment Summary, and Staff Assessment Summary. J Subst Abuse Treat, 19(3): 267–272.
12.
KnoxG. 1997. The facts about gang life in America today: a national study of over 4,000 gang members Available at http://www.ngcrc.com/ngcrc/page9.htmAccessed July 21, 2003. A special report of the National Gang Crime research center
13.
SavitzL, LawrenceR and LalliM. 1980. Delinquency and gang membership as related to victimization. Victimology, 5(2–4): 152–160.
14.
BjerregaardB and LizottteA. 2001. “Gun ownership and gang membership”. In The Modern Gang Reader., 2nd ed., Edited by: MillerJ, MaxsonC and KleinM. Los Angeles, California: Roxbury Publishing Company.
MacKenzieK, HuntG and Joe-LaidlerK. 2005. Youth gangs and drugs: the case of marijuana. J Ethn Subst Abuse, 4(3–4): 99–134.
17.
J. Hagedorn Gangs and the informal economy. 2002. Gangs in America Three., 3rd ed., Edited by: HuffR. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
18.
KleinM. 1995. “The American Street Gang”. In Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control, New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
GattiU, TremblayR, VitaroG and McDuffP. 2005. Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: a test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses. J Child Psychol Psychiatry;, 46(11): 1178–1190.
