The paper draws on the i-Treasures EU project which adopts cutting-edge sensors and ICT technologies to sustain Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) learning and transmission. It highlights how some of the main educational challenges that are characteristic of this peculiar field have been addressed in the project by relying on consolidated Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) practices and related tools. In particular, it focuses on pedagogical planning as a means to sustain the design, deployment and sharing of educational interventions, which are suitable and effective from the viewpoint of contents, structure and learning /teaching methodologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
UNESCO, Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Paris, 2003.
2.
VoogtJ.Pareja RoblinN., 21st Century Skills – Discussion Paper, University of Twente, Enschede (The Netherlands), 2010.
3.
OttM.PozziF., Towards a new era for Cultural Heritage Education: Discussing the role of ICT, Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27, 1365–1371.
4.
OttM.PozziF., ICT and Cultural Heritage Education: Which Added Value?. in Emerging Technologies and Information Systems for the Knowledge Society, Heidelberg, Springer, 2008, 5288, 131–138.
5.
M. Council Europe, Recommendation No. R (98) 5 of the Committee of Ministers concerning Heritage Education, Council of Europe, 1998.
6.
UNESCO, Lists of intangible cultural heritage and Register of best safeguarding practices, 2008.
7.
BoltonL., Unfolding the moon: enacting women's kastom in Vanatu, Honoululu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Press, 2003.
8.
AlivizatouM., Debating heritahe authenticity: Kastom and development at the Vanatu Cultural Centre, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2012, 18, 124–143.
9.
YimD., Living Human Treasures and the protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage, ICOM News, 2004, 57, n. 4, 10–12.
10.
DimitropoulosK.ManitsarisS.TsalakanidouF.NikolopoulosS.DenbyB.Al KorkS.Crevier-BuchmanL.Pillot-LoiseauC.Adda-DeckerM.DupontS.TilmanneJ.OttM.AlivizatouM.YilmazE.HadjileontiadisL.CharisisV.DerooO.ManitsarisA.KompatsiarisI.GrammalidisN., Capturing the Intangible - An Introduction to the I-Treasures Project, in Proc. 9th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP2014), Lisbon, 2014.
11.
ReigeluthC. M., Instructional Theory, Practitioner Needs, and New Directions: Some Directions, Educational Technology, 1997, 37, 5–11.
12.
DagninoF. M.OttM.PozziF., Intangible Cultural Heritage: towards collaborative planning of educational interventions, Computers in Human Behaviour, 2014, in press, http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.039.
13.
PozziF.AlivizatouM.DagninoF. M.OttM.AntonaciA., D2.1: First Report on User Requirements Identification and Analysis, Public Deliverable, The i-Treasures Project (FP7-ICT-600676), 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.i-treasures.eu/content/deliverables-0.
14.
AntonaciA.BraviP.DagninoF. M.LutzuM.OttM.PilosuS.PozziF., Exploring the Intangible through ICT, in 6th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI), Seville, 2013.
15.
ConoleG., Designing for learning in an open world, New York: Springer, 2013.
16.
CameronL., Could Pedagogical Planners be a useful learning design tool for university lecturers, in Readings in Educational Technology: Proceedings ICICTE2008, 2008.
17.
BottinoR. M.EarpJ.OlimpoG.OttM.PozziF.TavellaM., Supporting the design of pilot learning activities with the Pedagogical Plan Manager, in Learning to live in the knowledge society, KendallM.SamwaysB., eds., SpringerUS, 2008, 37–44.
18.
HattonN.SmithD., Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation, Teaching and Teacher Education, 1995, 11, 33–49.
19.
WattersC.DiezmannJ., Structuring Reflection as a Tool in Qualitative Evaluation, in Proc. HECU3 Conference, 2006.
20.
BeethamR.SharpeH., Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age Designing and Delivering E-Learning, New York: Routledge, 2007.
21.
BritainS., Learning design systems: Current and future developments, in Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age Designing and Delivering E-Learning, New York, Routledge, 2007, pp. 103–114.
22.
OlimpoG.BottinoR. M.EarpJ.OttM.PozziF.TavellaM., Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects, Computers & Education, 2010, 55, 476–488.
23.
JonassenD. H.HennonR. J.OndrusekA.SamouilovaM.SpauldingK. L.YuehH. P.LiT. C.NouriV.Di RoccoM.BirdwellD., Certainty, determinism, and predictability in theories of instructional design: Lessons from science, Educational Technology, 1997, 37, 27–33.
KitsikidisA.DimitropoulosK.UcurcaD.BayçayC.YilmazE.TsalakanidouF.GrammalidisN., A Game-like Application for Dance Learning Using a Natural Human Computer Interface. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Learning, Health and Well-Being, 2015, 472–482Springer International Publishing.
27.
AristidouA.StavrakisE.ChrysanthouY., Motion analysis for folk dance evaluation. In EG Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, GCH, 6–8 October, Darmstadt, 2015.
28.
AristidouA.StavrakisE.ChrysanthouY., LMA-based motion retrieval for folk dance cultural heritage. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8740, Springer International Publishing, 2014, 207–216.
29.
StavrakisE.AristidouA.SavvaM.HimonaS. L.ChrysanthouY., Digitization of cypriot folk dances. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7616, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, 404–413.
30.
HuH.TsengR.MingL.LinC.IkeuchiK., Representing postures and emotions of Taiwanese indigenous folk dances via Labanotation and Laban Effort. In International Conference on Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM), 9–12 December, Hong Kong, IEEE, 2014, 153–160.
