Close-in detonations can damage or destroy components of buildings. The damage to reinforced concrete components is often simulated using finite element codes with considerations of material erosion that are based on either a damage algorithm or a user-specified criterion, and both are explored in the paper. Single element simulations of concrete are performed to establish reliable values of concrete erosion strain as a function of strain rate, compressive strength, element size and loading condition. Numerical analyses of a reinforced concrete column subjected to blast loadings are performed using alternate representations of erosion to characterize the influence of concrete compressive strength, transverse reinforcement, and applied axial load, on predictions of damage.
MehannyS. S.DeierleinG. G.2000. Modeling and assessment of seismic performance of composite frames with reinforced concrete columns and steel beams. Report No. 135. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Stanford, CA.
2.
LignosD. G.ChungY.NagaeT.NakashimaM.2011. Numerical and experimental evaluation of seismic capacity of high-rise steel buildings subjected to long duration earthquakes. Computers & Structures89(11–12): 959–967.
3.
MalvarL. J.SimonsD.1996. Concrete material modeling in explicit computations. Proceedings, Workshop on Recent Advances in Computational Structural Dynamics and High Performance Computing, USAE Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, p. 165–194.
4.
MurrayY. D.2007a. User's Manual for LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. Report No. FHWA-HRT-05–063. Federal Highway Administration, DC.
5.
LawverP.OnetoR.StanleyM.TennantD.WeeksJ.2008. FLEX FE models and full scale tests of blast loaded reinforced concrete columns. Proceedings, DDESB 33rd Explosives Saftety Seminar, Palm Springs.
6.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2006. Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics. ASME V & V 10–2006, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
ANSYS.2009. AUTODYN User Manual Version 12.1. ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
9.
KurtaranH.BuyukM.EskandarianA.2003. Ballistic impact simulation of GT model vehicle door using finite element method. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics40(2): 113–121.
10.
FawazZ.ZhengW.BehdinanK.2004. Numerical simulation of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic composite armours. Composite Structures63(3–4): 387–395.
11.
SchwerL. E.2004. Preliminary assessment of non-Lagrangian methods for penetration simulation. Proceedings, 8th International LS-DYNA Users Conference. Dearborn, MI. p. 8.1–8.12.
12.
TengT. L.ChuY. A.ChangF. A.ChinH. S.2004. Simulation model of impact on reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Research34(11): 2067–2077.
13.
IslamM. J.LiuZ.SwaddiwudhipongS.2011. Numerical study on concrete penetration/perforation under high velocity impact by ogive-nose steel projectile. Computers and Concrete8(1): 111–123.
14.
LuccioniB. M.AmbrosiniR. D.DanesiR. F.2004. Analysis of building collapse under blast loads. Engineering Structures26(1): 63–71.
15.
XuK.LuY.2006. Numerical simulation study of spallation in reinforced concrete plates subjected to blast loading. Computers & Structures84(5–6): 431–438.
16.
ShinJ.WhittakerA. S.ArefA. J.CormieD.2014. Air blast effects on civil structures. Technical Report MCEER-14–0006, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, December.
17.
EdwardsD. H.ThomasG. O.MilneA.HooperG.TaskerD.1992. Blast wave measurements close to explosive charges. Shock Waves2(4): 237–243.
18.
RigbyS. E.TyasA.ClarkeS. D.FayS. D.WarrenJ. A.ElgyI.GantM.2014. Testing apparatus for the spatial and temporal pressure measurements from near-field free air explosions. Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Protection of Structures against Hazards, Tianjin, China.
19.
DusenberryD. O. (ed.) 2010. Handbook for Blast-Resistant Design of Buildings. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
20.
WightJ. K.MacGregorJ. G.2011. Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, 6th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
21.
XuS.ZhaoY.WuZ.2006. Study on the average fracture energy for crack propagation in concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering18(6): 817–824.
22.
LambertD. E.RossC. A.2000. Strain rate effects on dynamic fracture and strength. International Journal of Impact Engineering24(10): 985–998.
23.
LuY.XuK.2004. Modelling of dynamic behaviour of concrete materials under blast loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures41(1): 131–143.
24.
SchulerH.MayrhoferC.ThomaK.2006. Spall experiments for the measurement of the tensile strength and fracture energy of concrete at high strain rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering32(10): 1635–1650.
25.
BraraA.KlepaczkoJ. R.2007. Fracture energy of concrete at high loading rates in tension. International Journal of Impact Engineering34(3): 424–435.
26.
RuizG.ZhangX. X.TarifaM.YuR. C.CamaraM.2009. Fracture energy of high-strength concrete under different loading rates. Anales de Mecánica de la Fractura262: 513–518.
27.
GroteD. L.ParkS. W.ZhouM.2001. Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: I. experimental characterization. International Journal of Impact Engineering25(9): 869–886.
28.
RagueneauF.GatuingtF.2003. Inelastic behavior modelling of concrete in low and high strain rate dynamics. Computers & Structures81(12): 1287–1299.
29.
MurrayY. D.2007b. Evaluation of LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. Report No. FHWA-HRT-05–063. Federal Highway Administration, DC.
30.
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). 2008. United Facilities Criteria: Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions (UFC 3–340–02). Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, DC.
31.
Comité euro-international du béton (CEB). 1993. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code. T. Telford, London.
32.
MalvarL. J.RossC. A.1998. Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension. ACI Materials Journal95(6): 735–739.
33.
HaoH.ZhouX. Q.2007. Concrete material model for high rate dynamic analysis. Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Shock & Impact Loads on Structures. Beijing, China. p. 753–768.
34.
NgoT.MendisP.WhittakerA. S.2013, A rate dependent stress-strain relationship model for normal, high and ultra-hisgh strength concrete. International Journal of Protective Structures, 4(3): 451–466.
35.
BrannonR. M.LeelavanichkulS.2009. Survey of four damage models for concrete. Sandia Report No. SAND2009–5544. Sandia National Laboratories, University of Utah, Albuquerque, NM; Livermore, CA.
36.
CoughlinA. M.MusselmanE. S.SchokkerA. J.LinzellD. G.2010. Behavior of portable fiber reinforced concrete vehicle barriers subject to blasts from contact charges. International Journal of Impact Engineering37(5): 521–529.
37.
CookR. D.2002. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 4th Ed. Wiley, New York, N Y.
38.
PopovicsS.1970. A Review of stress-strain relationships for concrete. ACI Journal67(3): 243–248.
39.
JohnsonG. R.CookW. H.1983. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings, 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. International Ballistics Committee, The Hague, Netherlands. p. 541–547.
40.
MeyersM. A.MurrL. E.StaudhammerK. P.1992. Shock-Wave and High-Strain-Rate Phenomena in Materials. CRC Press, NY.
41.
BørvikT.HopperstadO.BerstadT.LangsethM.2001. A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids20 (5): 685–712.
42.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2003. Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement (ASTM A 615/A 615M-03a). Philadelphia, PA.
43.
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318. 2011. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–11) and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI.
