Following the positive phase of a blast comes a period where the pressure falls below atmospheric pressure known as the negative phase. Whilst the positive phase of the blast is well understood, validation of the negative phase is rare in the literature, and as such it is often incorrectly treated or neglected altogether. Herein, existing methods of approximating the negative phase are summarised and recommendations of which form to use are made based on experimental validation. Also, through numerical simulations, the impact of incorrectly modelling the negative phase has been shown and its implications discussed.
FriedlanderF. G.The diffraction of sound pulses. I. Diffraction by a semi-infinite plane. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 186(1006):322–344, 1946.
2.
NorvilleH. S.HarvillN.ConrathE. J.ShariatS., and MalloneeS.Glass-related injuries in Oklahoma City bombing. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 13(2):50–56, 1999.
3.
KrauthammerT. and AltenbergA.Negative phase blast effects on glass panels. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 24(1):1–17, 2000.
4.
DharaniL. R. and WeiJ.Dynamic response of laminated glass under blast loading: Effect of negative phase. In Structures under shock and impact VIII, pages 181–190, Crete, Greece, 2004.
5.
WeiJ. and DharaniL. R.Response of laminated architectural glazing subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 32(12):2032–2047, 2006.
6.
LarcherM.SolomosG.CasadeiF., and GebbekenN.Experimental and numerical investigations of laminated glass subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 39(1):42–50, 2012.
7.
TeichM. and GebbekenN.The influence of the underpressure phase on the dynamic response of structures subjected to blast loads. International Journal of Protective Structures, 1(2):219–234, 2010.
8.
TeichM. and GebbekenN.Structures subjected to low-level blast loads: Analysis of aerodynamic damping and fluid-structure interaction. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(5):625–635, 2012.
9.
YangM. and AhmariS.Investigation of effect of negative phase of blast loading on cable net curtain walls through the linearized stiffness matrix method. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 61(0):36–47, 2013.
10.
BryantL. M.EreksonJ. M., and HerleK. W.Are you positive about negative phase? In American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Structures Congress 2013, pages 103–114. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2013.
KingeryC. N. and BulmashG.Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. Technical Report ARBRL-TR-02555, U.S Army BRL, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA, 1984.
13.
US Department of Defence.Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. US DoD, Washington DC, USA, UFC-3-340-02, 2008.
14.
KinneyG. F. and GrahamK. J.Explosive Shocks in Air. Springer, NY, USA, 1985.
15.
CormieD.MaysG., and SmithP.Blast effects on buildings, 2nd ed.Thomas Telford, London, UK, 2009.
16.
HydeD. W.Conventional Weapons Program (ConWep). U.S Army Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA, 1991.
17.
BogosianD.FerrittoJ., and ShiY.Measuring uncertainty and conservatism in simplified blast models. In 30th Explosives Safety Seminar, pages 1–26. Atlanta, GA, USA, 2002.
18.
TyasA.WarrenJ.BennettT., and FayS.Prediction of clearing effects in far-field blast loading of finite targets. Shock Waves, 21(2):111–119, 2011.
19.
TyasA.BennettT.WarrenJ.FayS., and RigbyS. E.Clearing of blast waves on finite-sized targets, an overlooked approach. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 82:669–674, 2011.
20.
GranströmS. A.Loading characteristics of air blasts from detonating charges. Technical Report 100, Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1956.
21.
BakerW. E.Explosions in air. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA, 1973.
22.
GantesC. and PnevmatikosN.Elastic-plastic response spectra for exponential blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 30(3):323–343, 2004.
23.
Randers-PehrsonG. and BannisterK.A.Airblast loading model for DYNA2D and DYNA3D. Technical Report ARL-TR-1310, U.S Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA, 1997.
US Army Corps of Engineers.Methodology manual for the Single-Degree-of-Freedom Blast Effects Design Spreadsheets (SBEDS). ACE Protective Design Center, Omaha, NE, USA, PDC-TR-06-01, 2005.
26.
KambouchevN.NoelsL., and RadovitzkyR.Nonlinear compressibility effects in fluid-structure interaction and their implications on the air-blast loading of structures. Journal of Applied Physics, 100(063519), 2006.
27.
KambouchevN.NoelsL., and RadovitzkyR.Numerical simulation of the fluid-structure interaction between air blast waves and free-standing plates. Computers & Structures, 85(11–14):923–931, 2007.
28.
BrodeH. L.Numerical solutions of spherical blast waves. Journal of Applied physics, 26(6):766–775, 1955.
29.
BiggsJ. M.Introduction to Structural Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1964.
30.
MorisonC. M.Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis – a critical review and revision. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 32(8):1214–1247, 2006.
31.
LiQ. M. and MengH.Pulse loading shape effects on pressure-impulse diagram of an elastic-plastic, single-degree-of-freedom structural model. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 44(9):1985–1998, 2002.
32.
HuangX.HeL., and MaG.W.Soil-structure interaction and pulse shape effect on structural element damage to blast load. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 25:400–410, 2011.
33.
HallquistJ. O.LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, CA, USA, 2006.
34.
SubramaniamK. V.NianW., and AndreopoulosY.Blast response simulation of an elastic structure: Evaluation of the fluid-structure interaction effect. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36(7):965–974, 2009.
