Blast barrier walls have been shown to reduce blast loads on structures, especially in urban environments. Analysis of existing test and simulation data for blast barrier response has revealed that a need still exists to determine the bounds of the problem and produce a fast-running accurate model for the effects of barrier walls on blast wave propagation. Since blast experiments are very time intensive and extremely cost prohibitive, it is vital that computational capabilities be developed to generate the required data set that can be utilized to produce simplified design tools. The combination of high fidelity model-based simulation with artificial neural network techniques is proposed in this paper to manage the challenging problem. The proposed approach is demonstrated to estimate the peak pressure, impulse, time of arrival, and time of duration of blast loads on buildings protected by simple barriers, using data generated from validated hydrocode simulations. Once verified and validated, the proposed neural-network model-based simulation procedure would provide a very efficient solution to predicting blast loads on the structures that are protected by blast barrier walls.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerW.E.. Explosions in Air. University of Texas Press (Austin) 1973.
2.
RoseT.A.SmithP.D., and MaysG.C.. The Effectiveness of Walls Designed for the Protection of Structures Against Airblast From High Explosives, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Structures and Buildings, 1995; 110:78–85.
3.
RoseT.A.SmithP.D., and MaysG.C.. Design Charts Relating to Protection of Structures Against Airblast From High Explosives, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Structures and Buildings, 1997; 123:186–192.
4.
UFC 4-020-03, Security Engineering Final Design. Departments of the Army and the Air Force, May 1994.
5.
BogosianD. and YongjiangS.. An Enhanced Methodology for Predicting Loads behind Blast Barriers, 74th Shock & Vibration Symposium, October 2003, San Diego, California.
6.
BogosianD. and YongjiangS.. Assessment of and Predictive Methodology for Blast Barrier Effectiveness, TR-01-34, Karagozian & Case, January 2002.
7.
RickmanD. and MurrellD.. Miniature-Scale Experiments of Airblast Diffraction Over Barrier Walls: Results and Analysis, ERDC/GSL TR 04–2, USACE Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
8.
RickmanD.MurrellD., and ArmstrongB.. Improved Predictive Methods for Airlbast Shielding by Barrier Walls, ASCE Structures Congress, May 2006, St. Louis, MO.
9.
ZhouX.Q. and HaoH.. Prediction of Airblast Loads on Structures Behind a Protective Barrier. Int J of Impact Eng2008; 35:363–375.
10.
TM5–1300, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions. US Department of the Army; 1990.
11.
UFC 3-340-01, Design and Analysis of Hardened Structures to Conventional Weapons Effects. US Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency; 1 June 2002.
McGlaunJ.M.ThompsonS.L., and ElrickM.G.. CTH: A Three-Dimensional Shock Physics Code. Int J Impact Eng1990; 10:351–60.
19.
McKeownR.DengelO.HarrisG., and DiekhoffH.J.. Development and Evaluation of DYSMAS Hydrocode for Predicting Underwater Explosion Effects. Executive sSummary, Vol. I, IHTR 2492. Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Indian Head, MD, February 2004.
20.
FloodI.BewickB.DinanR., and SalimH.. Modeling Blast Wave Propagation Using Artificial Neural Network Methods. Advanced Eng Informatics2009; 23:418–423.
21.
LöhnerR.BaumJ.D., and RiceD.. Comparison of Coarse and Fine Mesh 3-D Euler Predictions for Blast Loads on Generic Building Configurations. In: Proc MABS-18, Bad Reichenhall, Germany, September 2004.
22.
FloodI. and KartamN.. Neural Networks in Civil Engineering. I: Principals and Understanding. J of Computing in Civil Engineering, 1994; 8(8):131–148.
23.
FloodI. and KartamN.. Neural Networks in Civil Engineering. II: Systems and Application. J of Computing in Civil Engineering, 1994; 8(8):149–162.
24.
RemennikovA.M. and RoseT.A.. Predicting the Effectiveness of Blast Barrier Walls Using Neural Networks, Int J of Impact Engineering, 2007; 34:1907–1923.
25.
NeedhamC.E.. Blast Loads and Propagation Around and Over a Building. 26th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Gottingen, Germany, July, 2007.
26.
MastinC.W.ArmstrongB.J., and WelchC.W.. Verification of the CTH Hydrocode Against the Kingery and Bulmash Data Sets. In: Lim Proc 66th S&V, October 1995. p. 121–9.
27.
Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC).GEMINI: The DYSMAS Euler Solver User's Manual (release 4.46), Indian Head, MD, April 2008.
28.
RothM.BennetJ.HeardW., and StinsonR.. CFD Modeling of Blast Intrusion into Field Fortifications. In: Proc 77th S&V, October 2006.
29.
RoacheP.J.. Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers; 1998.
30.
RoacheP.J.. Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies. ASME J of Fluids Eng, 1994; 116:405–413.
31.
SchwerL.SaadeghvaziriM.O'DanielJ., and MadsenT.. Free-Air Blast Simulation: Engineering Model and MM-ALE Calculations. In: Proc MABS 20, Oslo, Norway2008.
32.
FloodI.. Modeling Dynamic Engineering Processes Using Radial-Gaussian Neural Networks. J of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 1999; 7:373–385.
