Short term significant wave heights have been evaluated using the numerical WAM model and the results are compared with satellite (Jason-2) and moored buoy measurements. Additionally artificial neural network (ANN) is used to predict significant wave heights over a future time step and such predictions are also compared with corresponding satellite and buoy measurements. The observations from moored buoys monitored by India's National Institute of Ocean Technology for a period of about four and a half years at three locations in the Arabian Sea and three in Bay of Bengal covering the west as well as east coast of India are involved. The buoy recorded largest waves during the cyclonic condition, and this was confirmed at a location code named: BD11 by the satellite measurements as well as the WAM and ANN based evaluations. The evaluation accuracy reflected in the coefficient of correlation is found to be high in the Arabian Sea than the Bay of Bengal.
AzinfarH.KellsJ.A.ElshorbagyA., 2004. “Use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of local scour”.Proceedings of 32nd Annual General Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. pp. GC-350, 1–10.
3.
BenderL.C., 1995. Modification of the Physics and numeric in a Third–Generation Ocean Wave Model. Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
4.
DawsonC.W.WilbyR.L., “Hydrological modeling using artificial neural networks. 2001”Progress in Physical Geography, 25(1), 80–108.
5.
DeoM.C.NaiduC.S., 1999. Real time wave forecasting using neural networks. Ocean Engineering, 26, 191–203.
DobsonE.B.MonaldoF.M.GoldhirshJ.WilkersonJ.1987. Validation of Geosataltimeter-derived wind speeds and significant wave heights using buoy data, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 10719–10731.
8.
GrubertJ.P., “Prediction of estuarine instabilities with artificial neural networks”1995, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 9(4), 266–274.
9.
JangJ.S.R.SunC.T., 1995. “Neuro-fuzzy modelling and control”. Proceedings IEEE, 83(3), 378–406.
10.
Jian-Guo LiMartin Holt, 2009, Comparison of Envisat ASAR Ocean Wave Spectra with Buoy and Altimeter Data via a Wave Madel, Journal of atmospheric and Oceanic technology, Vol. 26.
11.
KomenG.J.CavaleriL.DonelanM.HasselmannK.JansenP.A.E.M., 1994. Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves. Cambridge, 532 pp.
MaierH.R.DandyG.C., 2000. “Neural networks for prediction and forecasting of water resources variables; a review of modeling issues and applications.”Environmental Modelling and Software, Elsevier, 15, 101–124.
14.
MandalS.PrabaharanN.2010. Ocean Wave Prediction Using Numerical and Neural Network Models, the Open Ocean Engineering Journal, 3, 12–17.
15.
McMillanJ.D., 1981. A global atlas of GEOS-3 significant wave height and comparison of the data with national buoy data, PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 134.
16.
Mitsuko Korobkin, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA; and E. D'Sa, Significant wave height in the Gulf of Mexico: Validation of jason-1 measurement against buoy data.
17.
MonaldoF. (1988). Expected differences between buoy and radar altimeter estimates of wind speed and significant wave height and their implications on buoy-altimeter comparisons. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 93: 2285–2302.
18.
MazarakisN.KotroniV.LagouvardosK.BertottiL., 2012. High-resolution wave model validation over the Greek maritime areas. National Hazards Earth System Science. Vol. 12, 3433–3440.
19.
NagyH.M.WatanabeK.HiranoK.M., “Prediction of Sediment Load Concentration in Rivers using Artificial Neural Network Model”, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 128(6), 588–595, 2002.
20.
JainPDeoM.C., “Real-time wave forecasts off the western Indian coast”, Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 29, pp. 72–79, 2007.
21.
JainPDeoM.C.“Artificial Intelligence tools to forecast ocean waves in real time”, The Open Ocean Eng. J., vol. 1, pp. 13–20, 2008.
22.
PanigrahiJ.K.SwainJ., 2010. Numerical Simulation and validation of Deep water spectral wind-wave, Marine Geodesy, Vol. 33, 39–52.
23.
RomeiserRoland, 2012, Global validation of the wave model WAM over a one-year period using Geosat wave height data, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, Vol. 98, 4713–4726.
24.
SakunoY.IijimaY., Preliminary study for a method of long term wave data collection and GIS constructionin Indonesian domestic sea using satellite data. Proceedings of the Japanese Conference on Remote Sensing, Journal Code:X0715AVol. 33; pp. 285–286, 2002.
25.
Steve BarstowGunnar MørkLasseLønsethPeter Schjølberg, Use of satellite wave data in the worldwaves project, Gayana68(2) supl. t.I. Proc. 40–47, 2004 ISSN 0717–652X.
26.
The ASCE Task Committee. “The ASCE Task Committee on Application of artificial neural networks in hydrology” Journal of Hydrological Engineering, ASCE, 5(2), 115–137, 2000.
27.
The WAM Model–A third generation ocean wave prediction model. J. Phys. Oceanogr.1775–1810.
28.
The WAMDI group, HasselmannS.HasselmannK.BauerE.JanssenP.A.E.M.KomenG.J.BertottiL.LionelloP.GuillaumeA.CardoneV.C.GreenwoodJ.A.ReistadM.ZambreskyL.EwingJ.A., 1998. The WAM Model–A thirdgeneration ocean wave prediction model. J. Phys. Oceanogr.1775–1810.
29.
TrentR.AlbertM.GagarinN., “An artificial neural networks for computing sediment transport.”Proc. ASCE Conf. On Hydr. Engrg., San Francisco, 1049–1054, 1993.
30.
TrentR.GagarinN.RhodesJ.“Estimating pier scour with artificial neural networks.”Proc. ASCE Conf. OnHydr. Engineering., San Francisco, California, 1043–1048, 1993.
31.
WassermanP.D., “Advanced methods in neural computing”, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993.
32.
WingeartK.M., 2001. Validation of operational global wave prediction models with spectral buoy data. United States Naval Academy.
33.
WingeartK.M.O'ReillyW.C.HerbersT.H.C.WittmannP.A.JenssenR.E.TolmanH.L., 2001. Validation of operational global wave prediction models with spectral buoy data. Ocean Wave measurement and Analysis, San Francisco, CA, EdgeB.L.HemsleyJ.M., eds., ASCE, 590–599.
34.
WuJ.K., “Neural networks and simulation methods”, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994.
