Grounded in self-determination theory, the purpose of this study was to develop and empirically test a comprehensive model of factors hypothesized to influence coaches' provision of autonomy-support. These ten factors included ego-involvement, self-determination, motivation efficacy, game strategy efficacy, technique efficacy, character-building efficacy, athletes' intrinsic motivation, athletes' competence, external pressure, and stress. Using a cross-sectional study design, 396 high school coaches completed a survey either online or via paper-and-pencil. Data from respondents with complete data (n=304) were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Fit indices provided support for both the measurement and structural model. Twenty-nine percent of the variance in autonomy-support was explained by the predictors in the model. External pressure was a significant negative predictor of coaches' autonomy supportive behaviors. Overall, findings from this study suggest a key intervention target for the promotion of autonomy-supportive interactional styles between coaches and athletes.
MageauG.A.VallerandR.J., The Coach-Athlete Relationship: A Motivational Model, Journal of Sport Sciences, 2003, 21(11), 883–904.
2.
AmoroseA.J., Coaching Effectiveness: Exploring the Relationship Between Coaching Behavior and Self-Determined Motivation, in: HaggerM.S.ChatzisarantisN.L.D. eds., Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2007, 209–228.
3.
IachiniA.L.AmoroseA.Anderson-ButcherD., Exploring the Strategies Used by High School Coaches to Facilitate Athletes' Psychological Need Satisfaction and Motivation, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2010, 5(2), 291–308.
4.
BartholemewK.J.NtoumanisN.ThøgersenntoumaniC., A Review of Controlling Motivational Strategies from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective: Implications for Sports Coaches, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2009, 2(2), 215–233.
5.
AmoroseA.J.Anderson-ButcherD.CooperJ., Predicting Changes in Athletes' Well-Being from Changes in Need Satisfaction Over the Course of a Competitive Season, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2009, 80(2), 386–392.
6.
BaumeisterR.F.LearyM.R., The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 2005, 117(3), 497–529.
7.
GagneM.RyanR.M.BargmannK., Autonomy-Support and Need Satisfaction in the Motivation and Well-Being of Gymnasts, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2003, 15(4), 372–390.
8.
ReinbothM.DudaJ.L., Perceived Motivational Climate, Need Satisfaction and Indices of Well-Being in Team Sports: A Longitudinal Perspective, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2006, 7(3), 269–286.
9.
ReinbothM.DudaJ.L.NtoumanisN., Dimensions of Coaching Behavior, Need Satisfaction, and the Psychological and Physical Welfare of Young Athletes, Motivation and Emotion, 2004, 28(3), 297–313.
10.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L., Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being, American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1), 68–78.
11.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L., Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectic Perspective, in: DeciE.L.RyanR.M. eds., Handbook of Self-Determination Research, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, N Y, 2002, 3–37.
12.
AmoroseA.J.Anderson-ButcherD., Autonomy-Supportive Coaching and Self-Determined Motivation in High School and College Athletes: A Test of Self-Determination Theory, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2007, 8(5), 654–670.
13.
ConroyD.E.CoatsworthJ.D., Assessing Autonomy-Supportive Coaching Strategies in Youth Sport, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2007, 8(5), 671–684.
14.
PelletierL.G.FortierM.S.VallerandR.J.BriereN.M., Associations Among Perceived Autonomy-Support, Forms of Self-Regulation, and Persistence: A Prospective Study, Motivation and Emotion, 2001, 25(4), 279–306.
15.
VierlingK.K.StandageM.TreasureD.C., Predicting Attitudes and Physical Activity in an “At-Risk” Minority Youth Sample: A Test of Self-Determination Theory, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2007, 8(5), 795–817.
16.
BartholomewK.J.NtoumanisN.RyanR.M.BoschJ.A.ThøgersenntoumaniC., Self-Determination Theory and Diminished Functioning: The Role of Interpersonal Control and Psychological Need Thwarting, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2011, 37 (11), 1459–1473.
17.
ReeveJ., Autonomy Support as an Interpersonal Motivating Style: Is it Teachable?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1998, 23(3), 312–330.
18.
StebbingsJ.TaylorI.M.SprayC.M., Antecedents of Perceived Coach Autonomy Supportive and Controlling Behaviors: Coach Psychological Need Satisfaction and Well-Being, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2011, 33(2), 255–272.
19.
TaylorI.M.NtoumanisN.StandageM., A Self-Determination Theory Approach to Understanding the Antecedents of Teachers' Motivational Strategies in Physical Education, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2008, 30(1), 75–94.
20.
ChelladuraiP., Leadership in Sport Organizations, Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 1980, 5, 226–231.
21.
ChelladuraiP., Managing Organizations for Sport and Physical Activity, 2nd edn., Holcomb Hathaway, Scottsdale, AZ, 2001.
22.
SmollF.L.SmithR.E., Leadership Behaviors in Sport: A Theoretical Model and Research Paradigm, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19(18), 1522–1551.
23.
HornT.S., Coaching Effectiveness in the Sport Domain, in: HornT.S. Ed., Advances in Sport Psychology, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2002, 309–354.
24.
GrolnickW.S.ApostolerisN.H., What Makes Parents Controlling?, in: DeciE.L.RyanR.M. Ed., Handbook of Self-Determination Research, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, N Y, 2002, 161–181.
25.
GrolnickW.S.GurlandS.T.DeCourceyW.JacobK., Antecedents and Consequences of Mothers' Autonomy Support: An Experimental Investigation, Developmental Psychology, 2002, 38(1), 143–155.
26.
GrolnickW.S.PriceC.E.BeiswengerK.L.SauckC.C., Evaluative Pressure in Mothers: Effects of Situation, Maternal, and Child Characteristics on Autonomy-Supportive versus Controlling Behaviors, Developmental Psychology, 2007, 43(4), 991–1002.
27.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L., Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will?, Journal of Personality, 2006, 74(6), 1557–1585.
28.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M., The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-Determination in Personality, Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2), 109–134.
29.
FeltzD.L.ChaseM.A.MoritzS.E.SullivanP.J., A Conceptual Model of Coaching Efficacy: Preliminary Investigation and Instrument Development, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91(4), 765–776.
30.
SullivanP.J.KentA., Coaching Efficacy as a Predictor of Leadership Style in Intercollegiate Athletics, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2003, 15(1), 1–11.
31.
PelletierL.G.VallerandR.J., Supervisors' Beliefs and Subordinates' Intrinsic Motivation: A Behavioral Confirmation Analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(2), 331–340.
32.
WilsonM.A.StephensD.E., Great Expectations: An Examination of the Differences Between High and Low Expectancy Athletes' Perception of Coach Treatment, Journal of Sport Behavior, 2007, 30(3), 358–373.
33.
SkinnerE.A.BelmontM.J., Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993, 85(4), 571–581.
34.
PelletierL.G.Seguin-LevesqueC.LegaultL., Pressure from Above and Pressure from Below as Determinants of Teachers' Motivation and Teaching Behaviors, Journal of Educational Psychology, 2002, 94(1), 186–196.
35.
DeciE.L.SpiegelN.H.RyanR.M.KoestnerR.KauffmanM., Effects of Performance Standards on Teaching Styles: Behavior of Controlling Teachers, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74(6), 852–859.
36.
FlinkC.BoggianoA.K.BarrettM., Controlling Teaching Strategies: Undermining Children's Self-Determination and Performance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 59(5), 916–924.
37.
PriceM.S.WeissM.R., Relationships Among Coach Burnout, Coach Behaviors, and Athletes' Psychological Responses, The Sport Psychologist, 2000, 14(4), 391–409.
ParkJ.K., Construction of the Coaching Confidence Scale, PhD Thesis, Michigan State University, 1982.
41.
MyersN.D.Vargas-TonsingT.M.FeltzD.L., Coaching Efficacy in Intercollegiate Coaches: Sources, Coaching Behavior, and Team Variables, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2005, 6(1), 129–143.
42.
MyersN.D.WolfeE.W.FeltzD.L., An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Coaching Efficacy Scale for Coaches from the United States of America, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2005, 9(3), 135–160.
43.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR., A Global Measure of Perceived Stress, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1983, 24(4), 385–396.
44.
AmoroseA.J., Development and Validation of the Problems in Sport Questionnaire, Unpublished Manuscript, 2008.
45.
DeciE.L.SchwartzA.J.SheinmanL.RyanR.M., An Instrument to Assess Adults' Orientations Toward Control Versus Autonomy with Children: Reflections on Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived Competence, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981, 73(5), 642–650.
46.
AndersonJ.C.GerbingD.W., Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103(3), 411–423.
47.
TomarkenA.J.WallerN.G., Structural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 1(1), 31–65.
48.
MarshH.W.RichardsG.E.JohnsonS.RocheL.TremayneP., Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and a Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis of Relations to Existing Instruments, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1994, 16(3), 270–305.
HuL.T.BentlerP.M., Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 1990, 6(1), 1–55.
53.
CummingS.P.SmollF.L.SmithR.E.GrossbardJ.R., Is Winning Everything? The Relative Contributions of Motivational Climate and Won-Lost Percentage in Youth Sports, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2007, 19(3), 322–336.
54.
AlexanderC.S.BeckerH.J., The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research, Public Opinion Quarterly, 1978, 42(1), 93–104.
55.
ReeveJ.BoltE.CaiY., Autonomy-Supportive Teachers: How They Teach and Motivate Students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91(3), 537–548.
56.
GrolnickW.S.WeissL.McKenzieL.WrightmanJ., Contextual, Cognitive, and Adolescent Factors Associated with Parenting in Adolescence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1996, 25(1), 33–54.
