Procedural, parametric and generative computer-supported techniques in combination with mass customization and automated fabrication enable holistic manipulation in silico and the subsequent production of increasingly complex architectural arrangements. By automating parts of the design process, computers make it easier to develop designs through versioning and gradual adjustment. In recent architectural discourse, these approaches to designing have been described as morphogenesis. This paper invites further reflection on the possible meanings of this imported concept in the field of architectural designing. It contributes by comparing computational modelling of morphogenesis in plant science with techniques in architectural designing. Deriving examples from case-studies, the paper suggests potentials for collaboration and opportunities for bi-directional knowledge transfers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarfraeT., Engineering The Water Cube, Architecture Australia, 2006, 95(4), 103–105.
2.
MacarthurJ. and CristG., Federation Square, Architecture Australia, 2003, 92(2), 46–64.
SchlueterA. and BonwetschT., Design Rationalization of Irregular Cellular Structures, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2008, 6(2), 197–211.
5.
KrippendorffK., The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, Taylor & Francis CRC, Boca Raton, FL; London; New York, 2006.
6.
HeapeC.R.A., The Design Space: The Design Process as the Construction, Exploration and Expansion of a Conceptual Space, PhD Thesis, Mads Clausen Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, 2007.
7.
KolarevicB., Digital Morphogenesis and Computational Architectures, Proceedigns of the 4th Confernece of Congreso Iberoamericano de Grafica Digital, SIGRADI 2000 – Construindo (n)o Espaço Digital (Constructing the Digital Space) [ISBN 85-88027-02-X], Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) 25-28 September 2000, 2000, 98–103
8.
KolarevicB. and MalkawiA., Performative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality, Spon Press, New York; London, 2005.
9.
HenselM.MengesA. and WeinstockM., Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategies, Wiley, London, 2004.
10.
WeinstockM., Self-Organisation and Material Constructions, Architectural Design, 2006, 76(2), 34–41.
11.
HenselM. and MengesA., Differentiation and Performance: Multi-Performance Architectures and Modulated Environments, Architectural Design, 2006, 76(2), 60–69.
12.
WeinstockM., Self-Organisation and the Structural Dynamics of Plants, Architectural Design, 2006, 76(2), 26–33.
13.
ArtopoulosG.I. and RoudavskiS., It's a Parasite!, (Eds. HartmannI.MichajlováS. and RybkováK.). in: International Biennale of Contemporary Art 2005 – National Gallery in Prague, Národní galerie v Praze, Prague, 2005, 122–123.
14.
ArtopoulosG.RoudavskiS. and PenzF., Adaptive Generative Patterns, Proceedings of The Second International Conference of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD 2006), The Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD), Sharjah, 2006, 341–362
15.
ArtopoulosG. and RoudavskiS., It's a Parasite! Prague Biennale Pavilion, Metalocus, 2006, 18.
16.
RoudavskiS.ArtopoulosG. and PenzF., Digital Design Techniques for Adaptable Systems: Prague Biennale Pavilion, GameSetAndMatch II: The Architecture Co-Laboratory on Computer Games, Advanced Geometries and Digital Technologies, Episode Publishers, Rotterdam, 2006, 478–486
17.
RoudavskiS., Staging Places as Performances: Creative Strategies for Architecture, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2008.
18.
WaddingtonC.H., Principles of Embryology, Allen and Unwin, London, 1956.
19.
RudgeT. and HaseloffJ.P., A Computational Model of Cellular Morphogenesis in Plants, (Eds. GoebelR.SiekmannJ. and WahlsterW.). in: Advances in Artificial Life, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3630, Springer, Heidelberg, 2005, 78–87.
20.
CowinS.C. and DotyS.B., Tissue Mechanics, Springer, New York, 2007.
21.
SachsT., Pattern Formation in Plant Tissues, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
22.
DupuyL.MackenzieJ.P.RudgeT. and HaseloffJ.P., A System for Modelling Cell-Cell Interactions during Plant Morphogenesis, Annals of Botany, 2008, 101(8), 1255–1265.
23.
DaviesJ.A., Mechanisms of Morphogenesis, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2005.
24.
DupuyL.MackenzieJ.P. and HaseloffJ.P., A Biomechanical Model for the Study of Plant Morphogenesis: Coleocheate Orbicularis, a 2D Study Species, Proceedings of 5th Plant Biomechanics Conference – Stockholm, August 28 – September 1, 2006, STFI-Packforsk AB, Stockholm, 2006,
25.
HaganS., Digitalia: Architecture and the Digital, the Environmental and the Avantgarde, Routledge, London, 2008.
26.
SokalA.D. and BricmontJ., Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, Picador, New York, 1999.
27.
LawsonB., ‘Fake’ and ‘Real’ Creativity using Computer Aided Design: Some Lessons from Herman Hertzberger, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition, ACM Press, New York, 1999, 174–179
28.
LawsonB., CAD and Creativity: Does the Computer Really Help?, Leonardo, 2002, 35(3), 327–331.
29.
SteadmanP., The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts, Routledge, New York, 2008.
30.
Aldersley-WilliamsH., Zoomorphic: New Animal Architecture, Laurence King, London, 2003.
31.
FeuersteinG., Biomorphic Architecture: Human and Animal Forms in Architecture, Axel Menges, Stuttgart; London, 2002.
32.
FrazerJ.H., An Evolutionary Architecture, Architectural Association, London, 1995.
33.
JodidioP., Architecture: Nature, Prestel, Munich; New York, 2006.
TsuiE., Evolutionary Architecture: Nature as a Basis for Design, John Wiley, New York, 1999.
36.
van EckC., Organicism in Nineteenth-Century Architecture: An Inquiry into its Theoretical and Philosophical Background, Architectura & Natura Press, Amsterdam, 1994.
37.
DollensD., Digital-Botanic Architecture, SITES Books, Santa Fe, NM, 2005.
38.
DollensD., A System of Digital-Botanic Architecture, Leonardo, 2005, 38(1), 15–21.
39.
BenyusJ.M., Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, Morrow, New York, 1997.
40.
ArciszewskiT. and KicingerR., Structural Design Inspired by Nature, (Eds. ToppingB.H.V.). in: Innovation in Civil and Structural Engineering Computing, Saxe-Coburg Publications, Stirling, UK, 2005, 25–48.
41.
ArciszewskiT. and KicingerR., Breeding Better Buildings, American Scientist, 2007, 95(6), 502–508.
FelicettiP.XieM.TangJ. and HuangX., Application of Evolutionary Structural Optimization Techniques to Architectural Structures, GameSetAndMatch II: The Architecture Co-Laboratory on Computer Games, Advanced Geometries and Digital Technologies, Episode Publishers, Rotterdam, 2006, 345–359
50.
SheaK.AishR. and GourtovaiaM., Towards Integrated Performance-Based Generative Design Tools, eCAADe 2001- 19th International Conference on Architectural Information Management, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 2001, 553–560
51.
SheaK., Directed Randomness, (Eds. LeachN.TurnbullD. and WilliamsC.). in: Digital Tectonics, Wiley-Academy, Chichester, 2004, 89–101.
52.
WoodburyR.WilliamsonS. and BeesleyP., Parametric Modelling as a Design Representation in Architecture: A Process Account, 2006.
53.
FriedrichE.HannaS. and DerixC., Emergent Form from Structural Optimisation of the Voronoi Polyhedra Structure, Proceedings of GA2007, X Generative Art International Conference, Milan Polytechnic, Milan, 2007,
54.
KawasumiM.II and KawasuM.III, The Secret Techniques of Bonsai: A Guide to Starting, Raising, and Shaping Bonsai, Kodansha International, Tokyo, 2005.
