Learning from experience is the essence of Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). Because architects are said to learn design by experience, CBR seemed to hold great promises for their field, which inspired, in the 1990s, the development of various Case-Based Design (CBD) tools. Learning from the experience of developing and using these tools is the objective of this paper. On the one hand, the original expectations seem far from being accomplished today. Reasons for this limited success can be found at three different levels: the cognitive model underlying CBR, the implementation of this model into concrete CBD tools, and the context in which these tools are to be used. On the other hand, CBR research seems to have caused some interesting side effects, such as an increased interest in creativity and copyright, and a re-discovery of the key role that cases play in architectural design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KolodnerJ., Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1993.
2.
SchankR.C., Dynamic Memory, A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
3.
LawsonB., How Designers Think, Butterworth Architecture, London, 1990.
4.
RechtinE., Systems Architecture, Creating and Building Complex Systems, Prentice Hall, London, 1991.
5.
HuaK.FaltingsB. and SmithI., CADRE: Case-Based Geometric Design, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1996, Vol. 10, pp. 171–183.
6.
FlemmingU.AygenZ.CoyneR. and SnyderJ., Case-Based Design in a Software Environment That Supports the Early phases in Building Design, in: MaherM.L. and PuP., eds., Issues and applications of CBR in Design, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1997, pp. 61–85.
7.
Schmidt-BelzB. and HovestadtL., Scenario for an Integrated Design Support for Architects, Design Studies, 1996, Vol. 17, pp, 489–509.
8.
VossA., Case Design Specialists in Fabel, in: MaherM.L. and PuP., eds., Issues and applications of CBR in Design, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1997, pp. 301–335.
9.
DomeshekE.A. and KolodnerJ.L., Using the Points of Large Cases, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1993, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 87–96.
10.
SmithI.StalkerR. and LottazC., Creating Design Objects From Cases for Interactive Spatial Composition, in: GeroJ.S. and SudweeksF., eds., Artificial Intelligence in Design '96, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 97–116.
11.
OxmanR. and OxmanR., Case-Based Design: Cognitive Models for Case Libraries, in: CararaG. and KalayY.E., eds., Knowledge-Based Computer-Aided Architectural Design, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 45–68.
12.
OxmanR. and OxmanR., Remembrance of Things in the Past: Design Precedents in Libraries, in: TzonisA. and WhiteI., eds., Automation Based Creative Design, Research and Perspectives, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 55–68.
13.
AkinÖ.CummingM.ShealeyM. and TuncerB., An Electronic Design Assistance Tool for Case-Based Representation of Designs, Automation in Construction, 1997, Vol. 6, pp. 265–274.
14.
HeylighenA. and NeuckermansH., DYNAMO: A Dynamic Architectural Memory On-line, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2000, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 86–95.
15.
HeylighenA. and NeuckermansH., A Case Base of Case-Based Design Tools for architecture, Computer-Aided Design, 2001, Vol. 33, No. 14, pp. 1111–1122.
16.
HeylighenA., Exposure to Experience, On the Role of Experience in Architectural Design Education, in: ScotfordM.MabardiJ.-F. and SchneiderR., eds., Research in Design Education, Herber Center for Design Excellence, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, Raleigh, 1998, pp. 148–151.
17.
ArlatiE.BottelliV. and FoghC., Applying CBR to the Teaching of Architectural Design, in: KlerckerJ.A.EckholmA. and FridqvistS., eds., Education for Practice, eCAADe, Lund, 1996, pp. 41–50.
18.
BrownJ.S. and DuguidP., Organizational Learning and Communities-Of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation, in: CohenM.D. and SproullL.S., eds., Organizational learning, Sage, London, 1996, pp. 58–82.
19.
SchönD., The Design Studio: An Exploration of its Traditions and Potential, RIBA Publications, London, 1985.
20.
HeylighenA. and NeuckermansH., Are Architects Natural Case-Based Designers? Experts speaking, Design Journal, 2002, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 8–22.
21.
CrossN., Designerly Ways of Knowing, Design Studies, 1982, Vol. 3, pp. 221–227.
22.
MaherM.L. and de Silva GarzaA.G., AI in Design: Case-Based Reasoning in Design, IEEE Expert, 1997, Vol. 12, No. 2.
23.
MatthewsD., and TempleS., A Pedagogy of Interdependent Technologies: An Experimental Studio for Synthesizing Digital and Mechanical Processes, in: NeuckermansH. and GeebelenB., eds., Computers in Design Studio Teaching, Transactions on Architectural Education, No. 03, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, 1999, pp. 99–106.
24.
MaherM.L., Case-Based Reasoning And Design, in: AchtenH.DijkstraJ. and van LeeuwenJ.P., eds., Design Systems Report 2, T.U. Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 1998.
25.
GunnC., Isolation or Integration, in: HarveyJ., Evaluation Cookbook, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 1998, pp. 18–20.
26.
NeuckermansH. and GeebelenB., eds., Computers in Design Studio Teaching, Transactions on architectural education, No. 03, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, 1999.
27.
ChristiaansH. and van AndelJ., The Effects of Examples on the Use of Knowledge in a Student Design Activity: The Case of the 'Flying Dutchman’, Design Studies, 1993, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 58–74.
28.
PressJ., Soul Searching: Reflections from the Ivory Tower, Journal of Architectural Education, 1998, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 233–242.
29.
TzonisA. and WhiteI., Introduction, in: TzonisA. and WhiteI., eds., Automation Based Creative Design, Research and Perspectives, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 1–40.
30.
HendricxA.GeebelenB.GeeraertsB. and NeuckermansH., A Methodological Approach to Object Modeling in the Architectural Design Process, in: TimmermansH., ed., 4th Design & Decision Support Systems Conference Proceedings, T.U. Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 1998 [CD-Rom].
31.
KoestlerA., The Act of Creation, Arcana, London, 1989.
32.
BarronF., Creativity, in: Encyclopedia Britannica 6, W. Baton, London, 1969, pp. 711–712.
33.
MacKinnonD.W., Creativity, A Multi-Faceted Phenomenon, in: RoslanskyJ.D., ed., Creativity: A Discussion at the Nobel Conference, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, pp. 29.
34.
SemperG., Vorläufige Bemerkungen Über Bemalte Architektur und Plastik Bei den Alten, in: Kleine Schriften, hrsg. von Hans und Manfred Semper, Kunstwissenschaftliche Studientexte 7, Mäander, Mittenwald, 1979, pp. 215–258.
35.
BallonG.L., Recht voor ingenieurs, Een inleiding, Mys & Breesch, Gent, 1995.
36.
KolarevicB.SchmittG.HirschbergU. and KurmannD., Virtual Design Studio: Multiplying Time, in: Computerised Craftsmanship, Ecole d'Architecture de Paris Val de Marne, Paris, 1998, pp. 23–130.
37.
BakerN.FanchiottiA. and SteemersK., eds., Daylighting in Architecture, A European Reference Book, James & James, Brussels, 1993.
38.
LeitchD., Little brother, in: ChardonnetS., ed., Writings in Architectural Education, EAAE, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1995, pp. 8–15.
