Traditional architectural design fulfills the basic needs of society, but its influence as a system to facilitate personal connection has declined with the growth of telecommunications and social networks. The advance of interactive architecture is now positioning buildings to once again fulfill the role as facilitator of connections and fulfill our personal need of belonging. While current attempts to integrate social communication, technology with built environments are nominally effective; Architectural Sociability is proposed as an effective design solution. Strategy details include a purpose based social approach in which social networks, localized data streams, ubiquitous computing, pervasive networks, and smart environments are considered a traditional part of an architectural structure.
McphersonM.Smith-LovinL. and BrashearsM. E., American Sociological Review: Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks Over Two Decades, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 353–375.
JinY.WangR.HuangH. and SunL., Wireless Sensor Network: Agent Oriented Architecture for ubiquitous computing in hyperspace, p. 74–84, January 2010.
12.
DianeC. and SajalD., Smart environments: Technology, Protocols and Applications, Wiley-Interscience, 2004.
13.
FoxM., and KempM., Interactive Architecture, New York, New York, 2009.
14.
AugustoJ.NakashimaH. and AghajanH., Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments: Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments: A State of the Art, Springer US, 2010, p. 3–31.
15.
CerniM, and PenhakerM., Rhythm Monitoring in Homecare Systems, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on biomedical engineering, December 3–6, 2008, Singapore p. 950–953.
16.
BonnerS., Assisted interactive dwelling house. Proceedings of the 4th TIDE congress, Finland, Helsinki, 2008.
17.
BarlowJ.BayerS. and CurryR., Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: experiences of ‘telecare’, Technovation, 2005, 26: 396–406.
AtkinsonM.GeddesN.D. and KanareykinS., A Trade Study of Computable Social Models For Managing DIME Effects in a Population, http://asinc.com/docs/MORS_Paper(1).pdf [20-102011].
23.
YumY.-O., and HaraK., Computer-mediated relationship development: A cross-cultural comparison, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2005, 11(1), article 7.
24.
BackstromL.HutternlucherD.XiangyangL. and KleingbergJ., Group Formation in Large Social Networks: Membership, Growth, and Evolution, KDD '06 Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2006.
25.
EricksonT., ‘Social' systems: designing digital systems that support social intelligence, Ai Society, Volume: 23, Issue: 2, Publisher: Springer, 2007, Pages: 147–166.
26.
MooneyL.A.KnoxD., and SchachtC., Understanding social problems (2nd ed.), Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth. 2002.
