The primary objective of this study was to obtain measurements of the noise generated by flow over an asymmetric trailing edge in an Anechoic Wind Tunnel (AWT) using a large aperture 40 microphone acoustic array. The sound field was complicated by the presence of unwanted or “parasitic” noise caused by the operation of the AWT. The ability of the array to separate the parasitic noise from the desired sound source was determined through a series of calculations using simulated source data. The bias errors that are caused by these extraneous sources were determined for three different array post processing algorithms: delay-sum (time-domain), weighted beamforming (frequency-domain), and a Deconvolution Approach to Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS). The results indicate that each method had advantages/disadvantages that were dependent on frequency. As such, different beamforming methods were utilized over different frequency ranges in order to produce the best possible spectral representation of the trailing edge source.
HumphreysW.M.BrooksT.F.HunterW.W.MeadowsK.R., Design and Use of Microphone Directional Arrays for Aeroacoustic Measurements, 36st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA-1998-471, Reno, NV, Jan. 12–15, 1998.
4.
VenkateshS.R.PolakD.R.NarayananS., Beamforming Algorithm for Distributed Source Localization and Its Application to Jet Noise, AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(7), 1238–1246.
5.
WilliamsJ.E. FfowcsHallL.H.Aerodynamics Sound Generation by Turbulent Flow in the Vicinity of a Scattering Half-Plane, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1970, 40, 657–670.
6.
HoweM.S., Trailing Edge Noise at Low Mach Number, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, 225(2), 211–238.
7.
HoweM.S., Trailing edge noise at low mach number, Part 2: Attached and Separated Edge Flows, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 234(5), 761–775.
8.
ManohaE.TroffB.SagautP., Trailing Edge Noise Prediction using Large Eddy Simulation and Acoustic Analogy, 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA-1998-1066, Reno, NV, Jan. 12–15, 1998.
9.
WangM.MoinP., Computation of Trailing-Edge Flow and Noise Using Large-Eddy Simulation, AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(12), 2201–2209.
10.
WangM.MarsdenA.L.MoinP., Computation and Control of Trailing-Edge Noise, Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Vol. III, Rome, Italy, Sept. 17–22, 2006, 169–182.
11.
MarsdenA.L.WangM.DennisJ.E.MoinP., Trailing-Edge Noise Reduction using Derivative-Free Optimization and Large-Eddy Simulation, J. Fluid Mech., 2007, 572, 13–36.
12.
BrooksT.F.HodgsonT.H., Trailing Edge Noise Prediction from Measured Surface Pressures, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1981, 78(1), 69–117.
13.
GershfeldJ.L.BlakeW.K.KniselyC.W., Trailing Edge Flows and Aerodynamic Sound, AIAA Thermophysics, Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, San Antonio, TX. 1988, AIAA-1988-3826.
14.
ChaseD.M., Sound Radiated by Turbulent Flow off a Rigid Half-Plane as Obtained from a Wavevector Spectrum of Hydrodynamic Pressure, J Acoust Soc of Am, 1972, 52(3B), 1011–1023.
15.
ChaseD.M., Noise Radiated from and Edge in Turbulent Flow, AIAA Journal, 1975, 13(8), 1041–1047.
16.
SijtsamaP.StokerR.W., Determination of Absolute Contributions of Aircraft Noise Components using Fly-Over Array Measurements, 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-2004-2958, Manchester, UK, May 10–12, 2004.
17.
OerlemansS.LopezB. Mendez, Acoustic Array Measurements on a Full Scale Wind Turbine, 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-2005-2963, Monterey, California, May 23–25, 2005.
18.
HutchesonF.V.BrooksT.F., Effects of Angle of Attack and Velocity on Trailing Edge Noise Determined using Microphone Array Measurements, International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2006, 5(1), 39–66.
19.
BlakeW.K., Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1986.
20.
ShannonD.W.MorrisS.C., Experimental Investigation of a Blunt Trailing Edge Flow Field with Application to Sound Generation, Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 41(5), 777–788.
21.
MuellerT.J.ScharpfD.F.BatillS.M.StrebingerR.B.SullivanC.J.SubramanianS., The Design of a Low-Noise, Low-Turbulence Wind Tunnel for Acoustic Measurements, 17th AIAA Ground Testing Conference, Nashville, TN, July 6–8, 1992, AIAA Paper No. 92-3883.
22.
ScharpfD.F., An Experimental Investigation of the Sources of Propeller Noise Due to Turbulence Ingestion, PhD Thesis, University of Notre Dame, 1993.
23.
UnderbrinkJ.R., Practical Considerations in Focused Array Design for Passive Broad-Band Source Mapping Applications, Masers Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1995.
24.
OlsonS.MuellerT.J., Phases Array Acoustic Imaging of an Airfoil Trailing Edge Flow, 11th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Notre Dame, IN, 2004.
BrooksT.F.HumphreysW.M., A Deconvolution Approach for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS) Determined from Phased Microphone Arrays, 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-2004-2954, Manchester, UK, May 10–12, 2004.
27.
DoughertyR.P., Extensions of DAMAS and Benefits and Limitations of Deconvolution in Beamforming, 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-2005-2961, Monterey, California, May 23–25, 2005.
28.
BrooksT.F.HumphreysW.M., Extension of DAMAS Phased Array Processing for Spatial Coherence Determination (DAMAS-C), 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-2006-2654, Cambridge, MA, May 8–10, 2006.
29.
EhrenfriedK.KoopL. (2006). A Comparison of Iterative Deconvolution Algorithms for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources, 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-2006-2711, Cambridge, MA, May 8–10, 2006.
