Finite Element Analysis to Determine Stress Concentration Factors of Dragline Tubular Joints

Abstract

This paper presents a finite element analysis (FEA), by using ANSYS 10.0 (SAS IP Inc 2005), to determine the stress concentration factor (SCF) of the dragline tubular joints. Different load cases, element types, weld sizes and shapes are considered in the analysis. The predicted SCF are compared with the experimental values based on full-size laboratory testing. Finite element (FE) model for the dragline tubular joint consists of the main chord and bracing members with all the attachments like, end plates, load cells, nuts and rods, with concave weld shape and equal weld leg length has been selected to determine SCF. Two layers of 10-node tetrahedral element (SOLID187) and 2 layers of 20-node hexahedral element (SOLID186) have been used in the FE model. The FEA results for all the laboratory test specimens are particularly good when loaded under load case 1 (LC1) and reasonable when loaded under load case 2 (LC2).

Keywords

finite element analysis hot spot stress stress concentration factor thick-walled circular hollow section tubular joint weld

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chiew

S.P.

Lee

C.K.

Lie

S.T.

Nguyen

T.B.N.

and Sopha

(2007). “Fatigue behaviour of partially overlapped CHS K-joints”, Proceedings of the Pacific Structural Steel Conference (PSSC 2007), Wairakei, New Zealand, 13–16 March, Vol. 2, pp. 145–152.

Dayawansa

Chitty

Kerezsi

Price

J.W.H.

Bartosiewicz

and Zhao

X.L.

(2005). “The structural challenge of mining dragline booms”, The 4th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, 16–18 February, Melbourne.

Gandhi

Murthy

Ramachandra D.S.

Raghava

and Rao

Madhava A.G.

(2000). “Fatigue crack growth in stiffened steel tubular joints in seawater environment”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 1390–1401.

Gao

Shao

Y.B.

and Gho

W.M.

(2007). “Stress and strain concentration factors of completely overlapped tubular joints under lap brace IPB load”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 305–316.

Gho

W.M.

Fao

and Yang

(2005). “Load combination effects on stress and strain concentration of completely overlapped tubular K(N)-joints”, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1243–1263.

Gho

W.M.

Gao

and Yang

(2006). “Strain and stress concentration of completely overlapped tubular CHS joints under basic loadings”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 62, No. 7, pp. 656–674.

IIW (2000). Fatigue Design Procedures for Welded Hollow Section Joints, IIW Doc. XIII-1804-99, IIW Doc. XV-1035-99, Recommendations for IIW Subcommission XV-E, Zhao

X.L.

and Packer

J.A.

eds., Abington Publishing, Cambridge, UK.

S.W.

Chang

I.H.

Park

K.K.

C.H.

and Kim

(2005). “A study on the fatigue crack in large-scale tubular joints for offshore structures”, 15th. International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seoul, Korea.

Lee

M.M.K.

and Llewelyn-Parry

(2005). “Strength prediction for ring-stiffened DT-joints in offshore jacket structures”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 421–430.

10.

Marshall

P.W.

(1992). Design of Welded Tubular Connections – Basis and Use of AWS Code Provisions, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

11.

Mashiri

F.R.

Zhao

X.L.

and Grundy

(2001). “Effects of weld profile and undercut on fatigue crack propagation life of thin-walled cruciform joint”, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 261–285.

12.

Packer

J.A.

and Henderson

J.E.

(1997). Hollow Structural Section Connections and Trusses, Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, Ontario, Canada.

13.

Shahi

Panjeh E.

(1994). Stress and Strain Concentration Factors of Welded Multiplanar Joints Between Square Hollow Sections, Doctoral Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft University Press, The Netherlands.

14.

Pang

N.L.

(2007). Fatigue Behaviour of Dragline Tubular Structures, Doctoral Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Australia.

15.

Pang

N.L.

Zhao

X.L.

Mashiri

F.R.

Dayawansa

and Price

J.W.H.

(2005). “Fatigue design of welded thick-walled tubular dragline joints”, Proceedings of the Australian Structural Engineering Conference 2005, Newcastle, Australia, 11–14 September.

16.

Pang

N.L.

Zhao

X.L.

Mashiri

F.R.

and Dayawansa

(2008). “Full-size testing to determine stress concentration factors of dragline tubular joints”, Engineering Structures, in press, Doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.014.

17.

Puthli

Veselcic

Herion

and Huhn

(2005). “Fatigue problems and use of high strength steel in towers of offshore wind turbines”, Stahlbau, Vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 423–429.

18.

Qian

Dodds

R.H.

and Choo

Y.S.

(2007). “Elastic–plastic crack driving force for tubular K-joints with mismatched welds”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 865–879.

19.

Qian

Dodds

R.H.

and Choo

Y.S.

(2005). “Elastic–plastic crack driving force for tubular X-joints with mismatched welds”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 1419–1434.

20.

Romeijn

(1994). “Stress and strain concentrations factors of welded multiplanar tubular joints”, Heron, Vol. 39, No. 3.

21.

SAS IP Inc, (2005). ANSYS 10.0 Users Manual, Swanston Analysis Systems (SAS) Inc, USA.

22.

Schaumann

and Wilke

(2005). “Current developments of support structures for wind turbines in offshore environment”, Advances in Steel Structures, Vol. II, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, Shen

Z.Y.

Lig

and Chan

S.L.

(eds), 13–15 June 2005, Shanghai, China, pp. 1107–1114

23.

Schumacher

and Nussbaumer

(2006). “Experimental study on the fatigue behaviour of welded tubular K-joints for bridges”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 745–755.

24.

Shao

Y.B.

and Lie

S.T.

(2005). “Parametric equation of stress intensity factor for tubular K-joint under balanced axial loads”, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 666–679.

25.

van Wingerde

A.M.

(1992). “The fatigue behaviour of T and X joints made of square hollow sections”, Heron, Vol. 37, No. 2.

26.

Walbridge

and Nussbaumer

(2007). “A probabilistic assessment of the effect of post-weld treatment on the fatigue performance of tubular truss bridges”, Engineering Structures, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 8 May 2007.

27.

Wang

Nelson

and Rauch

(2004). “Back to elements – tetrahedral verses hexahedral elements”, Proceedings of the 2004 International ANSYS Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 24–26 May 2004.

28.

Wardenier

(1982). Hollow Section Joints, Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands.

29.

van Zhao

X.L.

Herion

Packer

J.A.

Puthli

R.S.

Sedlacek

Wardenier

Weynand

Wingerde

A.M.

and Yeomans

N.F.

(2001). Design Guide for Circular and Rectangular Hollow Section Welded Joints under Fatigue Loading, TÜV Verlag, Cologne, Germany, 2001, ISBN 3-8249-0565-5.

30.

Zhao

X.L.

Wilkinson

and Hancock

G.J.

(2005). Cold-Formed Tubular Members and Connections, Elsevier, Oxford, UK