Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Punching shear failure of spandrel ledges has been observed by many researchers and heightened concerns have been raised questioning the safety level of the PCI shear design provisions for beam ledges. This paper presents non-linear finite element analyses conducted to model the behavior of prestressed L-shaped spandrel beams. Special emphasis was given to the behavior of the ledge at the end regions of the spandrel, where punching shear controls the design. The accuracy of the finite element model is demonstrated by comparing the predicted behavior to the results of one major test by another researcher. The influence of different parameters included in the PCI shear design provisions for beam ledges is discussed. The analysis is extended to illustrate the effect of other parameters including the prestressing level, hanger reinforcement and the amount of debonded strands at the end regions of the spandrel beam. Results of the analyses showed that the PCI shear design provisions for spandrel ledges are dangerously unconservative. The provisions do not account for key parameters, which affect the punching shear behavior.

Keywords

finite element analysis ledges punching shear prestressed concrete

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANATECH Corporation (2003). ANACAP Version 2.2.3 Reference Manuals.

Collins

M.P.

and Mitchell

(1997). Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 766 pp.

Hassan

Abdelrahman

Tadros

and Rizkalla

(2000). “Fibre reinforced polymer reinforcing bars for bridge decks”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 839–849.

Hassan

Lucier

Rizkalla

and Zia

(2007). “Modeling of L-shaped, precast, prestressed concrete spandrels”, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 78–92.

Klein

G.J.

(1986). Design of Spandrel Beams, PCI Specially Funded R and D Program Research, Project No. 5 (PCISFRAD#5), Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 95 pp.

Lucier

Rizkalla

Zia

and Klein

G.J.

(2007). “Precast concrete, L-shaped spandrels revisited: Full-scale tests”, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 62–76.

Mufti

A.A.

and Hassan

(2005). “Finite element analysis and theoretical study of punching shear strength of concrete bridge decks”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 449–453.

PCI Design Handbook (2004). Precast Prestressed Concrete, Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 614 pp.

Raths

C.H.

(1984). “Spandrel beam behavior and design”, PCI Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 62–131.

10.

Seliem

Lucier

Rizkalla

and Zia

(2006). “Behavior of bridge decks reinforced with MMFX steel”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, CD-ROM.

11.

Vecchio

F.J.

and Collins

M.P.

(1982). The Response of Reinforced Concrete to In-Plane Shear and Normal Stresses, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Publication No. 82–03, ISBN 0-7727-7029-8, 332 pp.

12.

Zia

and McGee

W.D.

(1974). “Torsion design of prestressed concrete”, PCI Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 46–55.

13.

Zia

and Hsu

T.T.C.

(1978). “Design for torsion and shear in prestressed concrete”, Proceedings of the ASCE Annual Convention, Chicago, 17 pp.

14.

Zia

and Hsu

T.T.C.

(2004). “Design for torsion and shear in prestressed concrete flexural members”, PCI Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 34–42.

15.

Zuo

and Darwin

(2000). “Splice length of conventional and high relative rib area bars in normal and high strength concrete”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 97, No. 4, pp. 630–641.

Finite Element Study of Shear Behavior of Spandrel Ledges and Comparison with PCI Shear Design Provisions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References