Characteristics of FRP-to-concrete bond are observed to deteriorate under cyclic loads. Deterioration has been observed under load conditions which result in a stress range in the bonded FRP of only 4% of the material capacity. Current design recommendations and “accepted practice” often neglect this detrimental effect. The clear effects of bond deterioration under fatigue loading are demonstrated for moderate-scale laboratory specimens and in full-scale specimens recovered from a forty-year old interstate highway bridge. The results suggest additional limit states that must be considered when even relatively small fatigue loads are present.
AASHTO (2004). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2.
ACI Committee 440 (2002). ACI 440.2R-02 Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, 45 pp.
3.
AidooJ.HarriesK.A. and PetrouM.F. (2006). “Full-scale experimental investigation of repair of reinforced concrete interstate bridge using CFRP materials”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 11, No. 3 (in press).
4.
AidooJ.HarriesK.A. and PetrouM.F. (2004). “Fatigue behaviour of CFRP strengthened reinforced concrete bridge girders”, Journal of Composites in Construction, ASCE, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp 501–518.
5.
BarnesR.A. and MaysG.C. (1999). “Fatigue performance of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP plates”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 63–72.
6.
Concrete Society (2004). Design Guidance for Strengthening Concrete Structures Using Fibre Composite Materials, Technical Report 55. Camberly, UK.
7.
CurtisPT. (1989). “The fatigue behaviour of fibrous composite materials”, Journal of Strain Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 235–244.
8.
Federation Internationale du Beton (fib) (2001). fib Bulletin 14: Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures.
9.
HarriesK. (2005). “Fatigue behaviour of bonded FRP used for flexural retrofit”, Proceedings of International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures (BBFS 2005), Hong Kong, December, pp. 555–560.
10.
HeffernanJ. P. (1997). Fatigue Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with CFRP Laminates, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, May, 157 pp.
11.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (2001). Recommendations for the Upgrading of Concrete Structures with Use of Continuous Fiber Sheets, Concrete Engineering Series 41, Tokyo, 250 pp. (available in English on CD).
12.
MandellJ.F. (1982). “Fatigue behaviour of fiber resin composites”, Developments in Reinforced Plastics, Vol. 2, pp. 67–107.
13.
MasoudS.SoudkiK. and TopperT. (2001). “CFRP-strengthened and corroded RC beams under monotonic and fatigue Loads”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 228–236.
14.
MeierU.DeuringM.MeierH. and SchweglerG. (1993). “Strengthening of structures with advanced composites”, Alternate Materials for the Reinforcement and Prestressing of Concrete, ClarkeJ.L., editor, Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow.
15.
National Research Council (Italy) (2004). CNR-DT 200/2004 Guidelines for Design, Execution and Control of Strengthening Interventions by Means of Fibre-reinforced Composites, Advisory Committee on Technical Regulations for Construction, Rome, 204 pp.
16.
National Research Council (1991). Life Prediction Methodologies for Composite Materials, Committee on Life Prediction Methodologies for Composites – NMAB 460, National Materials Advisory Board, Washington DC, 66 pp.
17.
NevilleA.M. (1975). Properties of Concrete, 2nd edition, Pitman.
18.
OehlersD.J. (2005). “Generic debonding mechanisms in FRP plated beams and slabs”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures, December 7–9, 2005, Hong Kong. pp. 53–44.
19.
PapakonstantinouC.G.PetrouM.F. and HarriesK.A. (2001). “Fatigue of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with GFRP sheets”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 246–253.
20.
QuattlebaumJ.HarriesK.A. and PetrouM.F. (2005). “Comparison of three CFRP flexural retrofit systems under monotonic and fatigue loads”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 731–740.
21.
ReeveB. (2005). Effect of Adhesive Stiffness and CFRP Geometry on the Behaviour of Externally Bonded CFRP Retrofit Measures Subject to Monotonic Loads, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. December.
22.
RoylanceM. and RoylanceO. (1981). “Effect of moisture on the fatigue resistance of aramid-epoxy composite”, Organic Coatings and Plastics Chemistry, Vol. 45, pp. 784–788.
23.
SebastianM.W. (2001). “Significance of midspan debonding failure in FRP-plated concrete beams”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 7, pp. 792–798.
24.
ShahawyM. and BeitelmanE.T. (1999). “Static and fatigue Kent A. Harries, John Aidoo, Andrew Zorn and Joshua Quattlebaum performance of RC beams strengthened with CFRP laminates”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 125, No. 6, pp. 613–621.
25.
TillyG.P. and MossD.S. (1982). Long Endurance Fatigue of Steel Reinforcement, IABSE Reports, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 37, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 229–238.
26.
ZornA. (2006). Effect of Adhesive Stiffness and CFRP Geometry on the Behaviour of Externally Bonded CFRP Retrofit Measures Subject to Fatigue Loads, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. April.
