Modeling Analytical Moment-Rotation Curves of Semi-Rigid Connections for CFT Square Columns and Steel Beams

Abstract

In a structural analysis for building frames, beam-to-column connections are assumed generally as a rigid and/or pinned condition for analysis simplicity. It gives some discrepancy for an overall behavior of building frames having some rotational rigidity in all connections. Many researchers have been interested in, and studied, structural behavior for building frames with semi-rigid connections. Despite many structural merits of concrete filled steel tubular (CFT) columns, such merits are not very clear for exact structural behavior between CFT columns and steel beams. This article is focused on a moment-rotation relationship for CFT frames composed of beam-column connections of exterior diaphragm with four rectangular plates. It is known from previous experimental results that CFT frames with exterior diaphragm connections have been represented as a semi-rigid condition, with a low stiffness due to out-of-plane deformations of square tubes. The main purpose of this study is to get a function formula of the moment-rotation curve for the connections. There are not sufficient test results of the connections to get a function. Therefore, an analytical approach needs to be utilized using a finite element program, ANSYS. The analysis models are made from existing test specimens and additional models are made for the implementation of insufficient test results. The function of a moment-rotation curve is proposed, using a three-parameter power model and a least-mean-square technique. The initial rotational stiffness of beam-to-column connection is determined by slope from zero to the analytical results.

Keywords

moment-rotation curve concrete filled steel tube beam-to-column connection finite element analysis rotational stiffness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lionberger

S.R.

and Weaver

Jr. (1969). “Dynamic respond of frames with non-rigid connections”, Journal of Engineering Mechanic, ASCE, Vol. 95, No. 1, pp. 95–114.

Razzaq

(1983). “End restraint effect on steel column strength”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 314–334.

Jones

S.W.

Kirby

P.A.

and Nethercot

D.A.

(1982). “Columns with semirigid Joints”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 316–372.

Chen

W.F.

and Lui

E.M.

(1985). “Columns with end restraint and bending in load and resistance factor design.” AISC Engineering Journal, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 105–132.

Kishi

and Chen

W.F.

(1987). “Moment-rotation relation of top- and seat-angle connections”, CE-STR-87-4, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, IN

Kishi

and Chen

W.F.

(1989). “Semirigid steel beam-to-column connections: Database and modeling”, Journal of ST, ASCE, Vol. 115, pp. 105–119.

Kishi

and Chen

W.F.

(1990). “Moment-rotation relations of semirigid connections with angles.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 116, No. ST7, pp. 1813–1834.

Lee

S.H.

(1997). An Experimental Study on the Strength of Beam-column Connection of Steel Tubular Columns with square External-diaphragm, Seoul National University.

Chong

I.Y.

(1998). A Study on the Development of Concrete Filled Tube Column to H Beam, Ministry of Construction & Transportation.

10.

Richard

R.M.

and Abbott

B.J.

(1975). “Versatile elastic-plastic stress-strain formula”, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, pp. 511–515.

11.

Chapra

and Chanale

(1997). Numerical Methods for Engineers with Personal Computers Applications, McGraw-Hill.