The paper presents a design optimization method for steel moment frames under extreme earthquake loading. Seismic demands of the structures are evaluated using a nonlinear pushover analysis procedure. Least structural weight is taken explicitly as one design objective. The other objective, pursuing uniform ductility demands in all stories, is realized indirectly by imposing an equal limit to the plastic interstory drift ratio of each story. Explicit forms of the objective function and constraints in terms of member sizing variables are formulated to enable computer solution for the optimization model. The proposed design formulation seeks a least-weight design with an optimal lateral stiffness distribution for steel moment frames. The concepts are illustrated for a three-story moment frame example.
AISC (1994). Manual of Steel Construction, Load & Resistance Factor Design, Volume I, Second Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction.
2.
AISC (2002). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction.
3.
ASCE (2002). Recent Advances in Optimal Structural Design, Edited by BurnsScout A, American Society of Civil Engineers.
4.
BruneauM.UangC.M. and WhittakerA. (1998). Ductile Design of Steel Structures, McGraw-Hill Companies.
5.
BSSC (1997). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC.
6.
ChenW.F. and LuiE.M. (1991). Stability Design of Steel Frames, CRC Press.
7.
ChopraA.K. (2001). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall.
8.
CohnM.Z. (1972). Analysis and Design of Inelastic Structures – Volume 2: Problems, University of Waterloo Press, Ontario, Canada.
9.
CSA (2001). S16–01: Limit States Design of Steel Structures, Canadian Standards Association, Ontario, Canada.
10.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-350 (2000). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, SAC Joint Venture.
11.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA.
12.
FleuryC. (1979). “Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 14, pp.1761–1783.
13.
FoleyC.M.PezeshkS. and AlimoradiA. (2003). “State of the art in performance-based design optimization”, Proceedings of ASCE Structures Congress, Seattle, Washington.
14.
FoutchD.A. and YunS.Y. (2002). “Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 58, pp. 529–564.
15.
GongY.XuL. and GriersonD.E. (2005). “Performance-based design sensitivity analysis of steel moment frameworks under seismic loading”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 63, pp. 1229–1249.
16.
GongY. (2003). Performance-Based Design of Steel Building Frameworks under Seismic Loading, PhD Thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
17.
GuptaB. and KunnathS.K. (2000). “Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 367–392.
18.
HasanR.XuL. and GriersonD.E. (2002). “Pushover analysis for performance-based seismic design”, Computers & Structures, Vol. 80, No. 31, pp. 2483–2493.
19.
ICC (2000). International Building Code. International Code Council, Falls Church, Va.
20.
KirschU. (1993). Structural Optimization, Fundamentals and Applications, Springer-Verlag.
21.
KrawinklerH. and SeneviratnaG.D.P.K. (1998). “Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, pp. 452–464.
22.
KunnathS.K. (2004). “Identification of modal combinations for nonlinear static analysis of building structures”, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 19, pp. 246–259.
23.
McGuireW.GallagherR.H. and ZiemianR.D. (2000). Matrix Structural Analysis, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons.
24.
NRC (1995). National Building Code of Canada 1995, Associate Committee on National Building Code, National Research Council, Ottawa.
25.
ScawthornC. (2003). “Earthquake: A historical perspective”, Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Edited by ChenW.F. and ScawthornC., CRC Press, USA.
26.
SchmitL.A. and FarshiB. (1974). “Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 692–699.
27.
TrumanK.Z. and ChengF.Y. (1997). “How to optimize for earthquake loads”, Guide to Structural Optimization, Edited by AroraJ. S., ASCE, pp. 237–261.
