This paper presents the innovative use of hot-rolled thickness-tapered mill products, longitudinally profiled (LP) plates, for the seismic performance of bridge bents of single and portal framed piers. The study involves the inelastic cyclic testing and numerical analysis of tested beam-columns and portal frames in order to evaluate the effects of tapering ratios of LP plates, penetration of yielding, and number of locally buckled panels on their structural ductility. A structural design method is proposed for the portal frames having LP panels under cyclic loadings.
BorowikowA.BleilH.DammK. and SchulzP. (1994). “Möglichkeiten des einsatzes dicken variabler grobbleche in stahl-und kranbau”, Stahlbau63, Heft 4, pp. 101–104.
2.
BrozzettiJ. (1996). “Recent development in composite bridges”, Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Steel Bridges, Rotterdam, pp. 8–18.
3.
DubasP. and GehriE., ed. (1986). Behavior and Design of Steel Plated Structures, ECCS-T.C.8, No. 44.
4.
FukumotoY. (1997). “New constructional steels and structural stability II”, Proceedings of Symposium Honoring T.V. Galambos, University of Minnesota, pp. 49–60.
5.
FukumotoY.UenoyaM.NakamuraM. and SayaH. (2003). “Cyclic performance of stiffened square box columns with thickness tapered plates”, International Journal Steel and Structures, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 107–115.
6.
FukumotoY. (2004). “Cyclic performance assessment of stiffened box columns with thickness tapered plates”, Proceedings of SSRC, Annual Technical Sessions & Meeting, Long Beach, Calif. pp. 1–18.
7.
FukumotoY. (2004). “Innovative use of profiled steel plates for structural performance”, Proceedings of International Symposium on Innovation and Advances in Steel Structures, Singapore, pp. 53–65.
8.
GeH.GaoS.B. and UsamiT. (2000). “Stiffened steel box columns. part 1: Cyclic behavior”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 29, pp. 1691–1706.
9.
GrarriguesG.GranboulamJ. and MazouJ. (1991). “A smart product for steel structures: Tapered plates. also called longitudinally profiled plates”, IABSE SymposiumLeningrad, Contributions of French Group, AFPC, pp. 91–117.
10.
HottaT.TaniT.KudoJ. and NishimuraN. (2000). “Application of longitudinally profiled steel plate to steel bridges”, Bridges and Foundations, Vol. 35, No. 4 (in Japanese).
11.
Japan Road Association (JRA 2002). Specifications for Highway Bridges Part II: Steel Bridges and Part V: Seismic Design (in Japanese).
12.
NishikawaK.MurakoshiJ.TakahashiM.OkamotoT.IkedaS.MorishitaH. (1999). “Experimental study on strength and ductility of steel portal frame bridge pier”, Journal of Structural Engineering, JSCE, Vol. 45A, pp. 235–244 (in Japanese).
13.
ShenC.MamaghaniI.H.P.MizunoE. and UsamiT. (1995). “Cyclic behavior of structural steels. II theory”, Journal of Structuring Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 11, pp. 1165–1172.
14.
TakakuT.FukumotoY.AokiT. and SusanthaK.A.S. (2004). “Seismic design of bridge piers with stiffened box sections using LP plates”, Proceedings of Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August, Paper No. 3224.
15.
VigoJ.M.HuboR. and RaoulJ. (1998). “Modern steels for constructional bridges: Longitudinally profiled-LP-plates”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 46, No.1–3, Paper No. 198.