Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The most common way for the health assessment of existing telecommunication towers is through visual inspection. However, the results of the visual inspection are highly subjective and are merely based on perception which may differ grossly from one expert to another. One of the best ways to normalize human perception and reasoning in decision making is through fuzzy logic. This paper presents a fuzzy approach towards health assessment and ranking of telecommunication towers based on visual inspection. The health assessment of tower is treated as a group multicriteria decision making (MCDM) problem in which the towers are rated by expert group based on different criteria. The model used in the paper is a modified version of fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The modified version rank the towers based on similarity with fuzzy positive ideal solution (FPIS) rather than the distance from fuzzy positive and negative ideal solutions. The model also provides critical information about the issues which need to be addressed to maintain the health of the towers and thereby enables efficient management and allocation of the limited resources. An illustrative example is included to clearly describe the steps involved in the process. Finally, sensitivity analysis for the model is carried out. The results of the sensitivity analysis demonstrate the tolerance of the model for slight variation in the input parameters, which typically reflect the doubt or confusion in the mind of expert while rating. The method is also compared with the closeness coefficient method and is found to be more appropriate for the ranking of towers. The model attempts to bring some rationality to the vagueness involved in visual inspection. The model is an effective tool for health assessment and ranking of towers based on visual inspection.

Keywords

visual inspection fuzzy TOPSIS tower assessment linguistic variables MCDM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bao

Shen

D.Y.

Hermans

and Janssens

(2012). “Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation”, Knowledge-Based Systems Vol. 32, pp. 84–90.

Behzadian

Otaghsara

S.K.

Yazdani

and Ignatius

(2012). “A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, pp. 13051–13069.

Chamodrakas

Leftheriotis

and Martakos

, (2011). “In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11, pp. 900–907.

Chen

C.T.

(2009). “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 114, pp. 1–9.

Chen

C.T.

Lin

C.T.

and Huang

S.F.

(2006). “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 102, pp. 289–301.

Delgado

Verdegay

J.L.

and Vila

M.L.

(1992). “Linguistic decision-making models”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 479–492.

Gattulli

and Chiaramonte

(2005). “Condition assessment by visual inspection for a bridge management system”, Computer_Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 95–107.

Hwang

C.L.

and Yoon

(1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, New York, USA.

Kaufmann

and Gupta

M.M.

(1991). Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.

10.

Klir

G.J.

and Yuan

(1995). Fuzzy Sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and Applications, Prentice-Hall Inc., USA.

11.

Krohling

R.A.

and Campanharo

V.C.

(2011). “Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, pp. 4190–4197.

12.

Luukka

(2011). “Fuzzy similarity in multicriteria decision-making problem applied to supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management”, Advances in Artifical Intelligence, Vol. 2011, 353509.

13.

Rouhani

Ghazanfari

and Jafari

(2012). “Evaluation model of business intelligence for enterprise systems using fuzzy TOPSIS”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, pp. 3764–3771.

14.

Sadi-Nezhad

and Damghani

K.K.

(2010). “Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 10, pp. 1028–1039.

15.

Torlak

Sevkli

Sanal

and Zaim

(2011). “Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, pp. 3396–3406.

16.

Verma

Mohan

and Rajasankar

(2012a). Site Inspection of 9m Roof Top Square based Microwave Tower at Royapuram, CSIR-SERC Research Report, No. R&D03-TSP 423941, Chennai, August 2012.

17.

Verma

Mohan

and Rajasankar

(2012b). Site Inspection of 24 m Roof Top Triangular based Microwave Tower at K. K. Nagar West, CSIR-SERC Research Report, No. R&D03-TSP 423941, Chennai, August 2012.

18.

Wang

J.W.

Cheng

C.H.

and Huang

K.C.

, (2009). “Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 9, pp. 377–386.

19.

Wang

Fan

and Wang

(2010). “Integration of fuzzy AHP and FPP with TOPSIS methodology for aeroengine health assessment”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 8516–8526.

Fuzzy Similarity Approach for Ranking and Health Assessment of Towers Based on Visual Inspection

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References