New mobility needs in urban areas combined with eco-friendly transport modes development and urban integration requirements have promoted urban tram lines. This urban transportation system provides important benefits but also damaging effects. Among these effects, vibration and noise may be highlighted. This may cause an important impact for both residents and structures located in the surrounding areas. In order to mitigate these inadequate effects, bituminous mixtures with different percentages of crumb rubber or Polyethylene Terephthalete are proposed in this research to substitute the concrete in the slab track design. Different laboratory tests were conduced so as to check the good mechanical and physical properties of these mixtures according to the European Normative. Finally, a stone mastic asphalt mixture with 0.5 %wt of Polyethylene Terephthalete is proposed as a new material with high vibration attenuation capacity and, moreover, a high stiffness which avoids excessive track deflections.
6.1-I.C. (2003). Secciones de Firmes, Instrucción de Carreteras, Ministerio de Fomento, Madrid, Spain.
2.
AhmadiniaE.ZargarM.KarimM.R.AbdelazizM.ShafghP. (2011). “Using waste plastic bottles as additive for stone mastic asphalt”, Materials & Design, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 4844–4849.
3.
AhmadiniaE.ZargarM.KarimM.R.AbdelazizM.AhmadiriaE. (2012). “Performance evaluation of utilization of waste Polyethylene Terephathalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 36, pp. 984–989.
4.
AlatasT.YilmazM. (2013). “Effects of different polymers on mechanical properties of bituminous binders and hot mixtures”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 42, pp. 161–167.
5.
BiligiriK.P.KaloushK.E. (2014).“Effect of specimen geometries on asphalt mixtures' phase angle characteristics”, Construction & Building Materials, Vol. 67, pp. 249–257.
6.
CEDEX (2007). Manual de Empleo de Caucho de NFU en Mezclas Bituminosas, Centro de Publicaciones, Secretaría General Técnica Ministerio de Fomento y Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, CEDEX, Madrid, Spain.
7.
ChenJ.S.LinK.Y. (2005), “Mechanism and behavior of bitumen strength reinforcement using fibers”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 87–95.
8.
Do ValeA.C.CasagrandeM.D.SoaresJ.B. (2014). “Bahavior of natural fiber in stone matrix asphalt mixtures using two design methods”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 457–465.
9.
EsveldC. (2001). Modern Railway Track, MRT-Productions, Delft, Netherlands.
10.
EAPA (2003). Asphalt in Railway Tracks, European Asphalt Pavement Association, Breukelen, Netherlands.
11.
EN 12697–6 (2012). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part 6: Determination of Bulk Density of Bituminous Specimens, Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
12.
EN 12697–8 (2003). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part 8: Determination of Void Characteristics of Bituminous Specimens, Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
13.
EN 12697–24 (2012). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part 24: Resistance to Fatigue. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
14.
EN 12697–26 (2012). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part 26: Stiffness, Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
15.
EN 12697–30 (2013). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part 30: Specimen Preparation by Impact Compactor, Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
16.
EN 12697–34:2012 (2012). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part 34: Marshall Test, Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
17.
EN 13108–1:2008 (2008). Bituminous Mixtures, Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt, Part I: Asphalt Concrete, Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.
18.
KouroussisG.PauwelsN.BruxP.ContiC.VerlindenO. (2014a). “A numerical analysis of the influence of tram characteristics and rail profile on railway traffic ground-borne noise and vibration in the Brussels Region”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 482, pp. 452–460.
19.
KourousissisG.Van ParysL.ContiC.VerlindenO. (2014b). “Using three-dimensional finite element analysis in time domain to model railway-induced ground vibrations”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 70, pp. 63–76.
20.
LakusicS.AhacM. (2012). “Rail traffic noise and vibration mitigation measures in urban areas”, Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 427–435.
21.
LiY.L.OuY.J.TanY.Q.LuM.Y. (2012). “Dynamic characteristics of rubber powder modified cement asphalt mortar”, Advances in Intelligent Transportation System and Technology, Advances Engineering Forum, Vol. 5, pp. 243–246.
22.
MariE.L.MoranM.S.R.AustriaC.O. (2009). “Paper mill sludge as fiber additive for asphalt road pavement”, Philippine Journal of Science, Vol. 138, No. 1, pp. 29–36.
23.
MashaanN.S.AliA.H.KotingS.KarimM.R. (2013). “Performance evaluation of crumb rubber modified stone mastic asphalt pavement in Malaysia”, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, DOI: 10.1155/2013/304676.
24.
MashaanN.S.KarimM.R.AzizM.A.IbrahimM.R.KatmanH.Y.KotingS. (2014). “Evaluation of fatigue life of CRM-reinforced SMA and its relationship to dynamic stiffness”, The Scientific World Journal, DOI:10.1155/2014/968075.
25.
MoghaddamT.B.KarimM.R.SyammaunT. (2012). “Dynamic properties of stone mastic asphalt mixtures containing waste plastic bottles”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 34, pp. 236–242.
26.
OdaS.FernandesJ.L.IldefonsoJ.S. (2012) “Analysis of use of natural fibers and asphalt rubber binder in discontinuous asphalt mixtures”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 13–20.
27.
PallasM.A.LelongJ.ChatagnonR. (2011) “Characterization of tram noise emission and contribution of the noise source”, Applied Acoustics, Vol. 72, No. 7, pp. 437–450.
28.
PG-3 (2011). Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas Generales Para Obras de Carretera y Puentes (PG-3), Centro de Publicaciones Secretaría General de Carreteras, Ministerio de Fomento, Madrid, Spain.
29.
RasdanM.YatiH.RehanM.KotingS.MashaanN. (2013). “A Review on the effect of crumb rubber addition to the rheology of crumb rubber modified bitumen”, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, DOI: 10.1155/2013/415246.
30.
RealJ.MartinezP.MontalbánL.VillanuevaA. (2011). “Modelling vibrations caused by tram movement on slab track line”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, Vol. 54, No. 1–2, pp. 280–291.
31.
RealJ.ZamoranoC.AsensioT.RealT. (2013). “Study of the mitigation of tram-induced vibrations on different track typologies”, Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 2057–2075.
32.
RealJ.I.ZamoranoC.HernándezC.RibesF. (2014). “Wave barriers for the reduction of railway induced vibrations. Analysis in tracks with geometric restrictions”, Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 16, pp. 2821–2833.
33.
RoseJ.FonsecaP.RidgwayN. (2010). “Utilization of asphalt/bituminous layers and coatings in railway trackbeds – a compendium of international applications”, Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference, Conference on Railroad Infrastructure Engineering Safety, Security and Environment, Illinois, USA, pp. 239–255.
34.
WangJ.C.ZengX.W.MullenR.L. (2005). “Three-dimensional finite element simulations of ground vibration generated by high-speed trains and engineering countermeasures”, Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 1437–1453.
35.
WayG.CarlsonD.SousaJ.KaloushK.BiligiriK. (2010). “Introduction to asphalt-rubber pavement noise reducing characteristics”, 39th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 7408–7417.
36.
XueY.J.HouH.B.ZhuS.J.ZhaJ. (2009). “Utilization of municipal solid waste incineration ash in stone mastic asphalt mixture: pavement performance and environmental impact”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 989–996.
37.
YildirimY. (2007). “Polymer modified asphalt binders”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 66–72.
38.
ZhongX.ZengX.RoseJ. (2002). “Shear modulus and damping ratio of rubber-modified asphalt mixes and unsaturated subgrade soils”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 496–502.
