Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aims to address how efforts spent in geotechnical site investigation can link to the final design dimensions of a geotechnical structure. An example of pad foundation design supported by boulder clay (developed by European Technical Committee 10) is used as a demonstration. Three aspects of geotechnical information are addressed: variety of in-situ and laboratory tests, precision of the tests, and local experiences in soil properties that permit reduction of transformation uncertainties between test indices and design parameters. Three design methods (allowable stress design ASD, partial-factor design PFD, and reliability-based design RBD) are considered. Among these methods, RBD is found to be most responsive to the availability of geotechnical information, whether in the form of site investigation efforts and/or local experiences. It is accurate to say that RBD can fill a critical gap in current geotechnical design practice, namely to monetize the value of geotechnical information in the form of increase/reduction of construction costs associated with changes in the design dimensions.

Keywords

design geotechnical structure site investigation reliability simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bjerrum

(1972). “Embankment on soft ground”, Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference on Performance of Earth and Earth-Supported Structures, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA.

British Standards Institute (2004). Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design – Part 1: General Rules (BS EN 1997–1), British Standards Institute, London, UK.

Chandler

R.J.

(1988). “The in-situ measurement of the undrained shear strength of clays using the field vane”, Vane Shear Strength Testing in Soils: Field and Laboratory Studies, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 13–44.

Ching

Phoon

K.K.

and Chen

Y.C.

(2010). “Reducing shear strength uncertainties in clays by multivariate correlations”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 16–33.

Ching

and Phoon

K.K.

(2012). “Establishment of generic transformations for geotechnical design parameters”, Structural Safety, 35, 52–62.

Eurocode (2011). Geotechnical Design ETC10 Design Example 2.2, Pad Foundation with Inclined Eccentric Load on Boulder, European Technical Committee 10, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, London, UK.

Gilks

W.R.

Richardson

, and Spiegelhalter

D.J.

, eds. (1996). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, London.

Hara

Ohta

Niwa

Tanaka

and Banno

(1974). “Shear modulus and shear strength of cohesive soils”, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 1–12.

Jamiolkowski

Ladd

C.C.

Germaine

J.T.

and Lancellotta

(1985). “New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils”, Proceedings of the 11^th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA.

10.

Keaveny

J.M.

and Mitchell

J.K.

(1986). “Strength of fine-grained soils using the piezocone”, Use of In-Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering (GSP-6), American Society for Civil Engineering, New York, USA.

11.

Konrad

J.M.

and Law

K.T.

(1987). “Undrained shear strength from piezocone tests”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 392–405.

12.

Kulhawy

F.H.

and Mayne

P.W.

(1990). Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design, Report EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.

13.

Lacasse

and Lunne

(1988). “Calibration of dilatometer correlations”, Proceedings of the 1^st International Symposium on Penetration Testing (ISOPT-1), Orlando, Florida, USA.

14.

Ladd

C.C.

and Foott

(1974). “New design procedure for stability in soft clays”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. 7, pp. 763–786.

15.

Ladd

C.C.

Foote

Ishihara

Schlosser

and Poulos

H.G.

(1977). “Stress-deformation and strength characteristics”, Proceedings of the 9^th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.

16.

Mair

R.J.

and Wood

D.M.

(1987). Pressuremeter Testing, Butterworths, London, USA.

17.

Mesri

(1975). “Discussion of ‘New design procedure for stability of soft clays’”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 409–412.

18.

Orr

T.L.L.

(2006). “Development and implementation of Eurocode 7”, Proceedings of International Symposium on New Generation Design Codes for Geotechnical Engineering Practice, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1–18. (CD-ROM)

19.

Phoon

K.K.

(1995). Reliability-Based Design of Foundations for Transmission Line Structures, PhD Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

20.

Skempton

A.W.

(1957). “Discussion of ‘Planning and design of new Hong Kong airport’”. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 7, pp. 305–307.

21.

Sørensen

J.D.

(2002). “Calibration of partial safety factors in Danish structural codes”. Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, March.

22.

Szechy

and Varga

(1978). Foundation Engineering – Soil Exploration and Spread Foundations, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.

23.

Terzaghi

and Peck

R.B.

(1967). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Wiley International, New York, USA.

24.

Watabe

Tanaka

and Kikuchi

(2009). “Practical determination method for soil parameters adopted in the new performance based design code for port facilities in Japan”, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 827–839.

Value of Geotechnical Site Investigation in Reliability-Based Design

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References