There is an increasing demand for high strength steel in the construction of buildings and civil engineering structures. However, there is a significant lack of knowledge of the behaviour of this type of construction. Research must focuses on the characterization of the strength and ductility of members (tension, compression and flexural members) and joints. In view of the severe deformation demands that are placed on many type of joints, particularly bolted connections, a special emphasis is given to assess current joint design criteria to understand what is expected of the high strength steel material. To address these topics, an experimental investigation was undertaken on moment connections with end plates made from high strength steel S460, S690 and S960 (yield stress of 460 N/mm2, 690 N/mm2 and 960 N/mm2, respectively) to provide insight into the nonlinear behaviour of this joint type. Test results show that the extrapolation of current design philosophy based on the semi-continuous/partially-restrained concept gives accurate strength predictions and that these connections can achieve reasonable rotation demands.
AggerskovH. (1977). “Analysis of bolted connections subjected to prying”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. 11, pp. 2145–2163.
2.
BegDZupančičE and VayasI. (2004). “On the rotation capacity of moment connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 60, No. 3–5, pp. 601–620.
3.
BjorhovdeR. (2004a). “Deformation considerations for connection performance and design”, Proceedings of the Fifth International ECCS/AISC Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures: Innovative Steel Connections, BijlaardF.S.K.GresnigtA.M. and van der VegteG.J., eds., pp.11–20.
4.
BjorhovdeR. (2004b). “Development and use of high performance steel”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 60, Nos. 3–5, pp. 393–400.
5.
CEN: European Committee for Standardization (2005a). EN 1993–1– 1 – Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings.
6.
CEN: European Committee for Standardization (2005b). EN 1993- 1–8 – Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–8: Design of Joints.
7.
CEN: European Committee for Standardization (2005c). EN 1993–1– 12 -- Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–12: Additional Rules for the Extension of EN 1993 up to Steel Grades S700.
8.
FaellaC.PilusoV. and RizzanoG. (2000). Structural Semi-Rigid Connections – Theory, Design and Software, CRC Press.
9.
GioncuV.MateescuG.PetcuD. and AnastasiadisA. (2000). “Prediction of available ductility by means of local plastic mechanism method: DUCTROT computer program”, Chapter 2.1 in Moment Resistant Connections of Steel Frames in Seismic Areas, MazzolaniF., ed., E&FN Spon, pp. 95–146.
10.
CoelhoGirão A.M. (2004). Characterization of the Ductility of Bolted End Plate Beam-to-Column Steel Connections, PhD Thesis, University of Coimbra.
11.
CoelhoGirão A.M.BijlaardF.S.K. and da SilvaSimões L. (2004). “Experimental assessment of the ductility of extended end plate connections”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, No. 9, pp. 1185–1206.
12.
CoelhoGirão A.M. and BijlaardF.S.K. (2006). Experimental Behaviour of High Performance Steel Moment Connections, Report 6-06-5, Delft University of Technology.
13.
CoelhoGirão A.M.da SilvaSimões L. and BijlaardF.S.K. (2006). “Ductility analysis of bolted extended end plate beam-to-column connections in the framework of the component method”, Steel and Composite Structures, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 33–53.
14.
CoelhoGirão A.M. and BijlaardF.S.K. (2007). “Experimental behaviour of high strength steel end plate connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 63, No. 9, pp. 1228–1240.
15.
GreenP.S.SauseR. and RiclesJ.M. (2002). “Strength and ductility of HPS flexural members”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 58, No. 5–8, pp. 907–941.
16.
GüntherH.P. (2005). Use and Application of High-Performance Steels for Steel Structures, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), Structural Engineering Documents, Vol. 8.
17.
HuberG. and TschemmerneggF. (1998). “Modelling of beam-to-column joints”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 199–216.
18.
JaspartJ.P. (1991). Étude de la Semi-Rigidité des Noeuds Pouter- Colonne et son Influence sur la Resistance et la Stabilité des Ossatures en Acier, PhD Thesis, University of Liège. (in French)
19.
JaspartJ.P. (1997). Contributions to Recent Advances in the Field of Steel Joints – Column Bases and Further Configurations for Beam-to-Column Joints and Beam Splices, Professorship Thesis, University of Liège.
20.
PackerJ.A. and MorrisL.J. (1977). “A limit state design method for the tension region of bolted beam-to-column connections”, The Structural Engineer, Vol. 55, No. 10, pp. 446–458.
21.
RiclesJ.M.SauseR. and GreenP.S. (1998). “High-strength steel: Implications of material and geometric characteristics on inelastic flexural behaviour”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, No. 4–6, pp. 323–335.
22.
WeynandK.JaspartJ.P. and SteenhuisM. (1995). “The stiffness model of revised Annex J of Eurocode 3”, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures III, Behaviour, Strength and Design, BjorhovdeR.ColsonA. and ZandoniniR., eds., Trento, pp. 441–452.
23.
WilkinsonS.HurdmanG. and CrowtherA. (2006). “A moment resisting connection for earthquake resistant structures”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 295–302.
24.
YeeY.L. and MelchersR.E. (1986). “Moment-rotation curves for bolted connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 615–635.
25.
ZoetemeijerP. (1974). “A design method for the tension side of statically loaded, bolted beam-to-column connections”, Heron, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1–59.
26.
ZoetemeijerP. (1990). Summary of the Research on Bolted Beam-to-Column Connections, Report 25-6-90-2, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Stevin Laboratory – Steel Structures, Delft University of Technology.
