Sonel mapping is a Monte-Carlo-based acoustical modeling technique that approximates the acoustics of an environment while accounting for diffuse and specular reflections as well as diffraction effects. Through the use of a probabilistic Russian roulette strategy to determine the type of interaction between a sound and any objects/surfaces it may encounter, sonel mapping avoids excessively large running times in contrast to deterministic techniques. Sonel mapping approximates many of the subtle interaction effects required for realistic acoustical modeling yet due to its probabilistic nature, can be incorporated into interactive virtual environments where accuracy is often substituted for efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShillingR. D., and Shinn-CunninghamB.Virtual Auditory Displays, In Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, StanneyK., Mahwah, NJ. USA, 2002.
2.
KapralosB.JenkinM., and MiliosE. H.Virtual audio systems. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, December 2008, Volume 17, Number/Issue 6, Pages 527–549.
3.
DoelK.KryP. G., and PaiD. K.FoleyAutomatic: Physically-based sound effects for interactive simulation and animation. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) 2001, Los Angeles, CA. USA, August 12–17 2001.
4.
CohenM., and WenzelE.The Design of Multidimensional Sound Interfaces. In Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, Oxford University Press Inc., BarfieldW., and FurnessT., New York, NY. USA, 1995.
5.
SvenssonU. P., and KristiansenU. R.Computational modeling and simulation of acoustic spaces. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Virtual, Synthetic and Entertainment Audio, Espoo, Finland, June 15–17, 2002.
6.
HechtE.Optics. Pearson Education Inc., San Francisco, CA. USA, fourth edition, 2002.
7.
BegaultR.3-D Sound for Virtual Reality and Multimedia. Academic Press Professional, Cambridge, MA. USA, 1994.
8.
CarlileVirtualS.Auditory Space: Generation and Application. R. G. Landes Company, Austin, TX. USA, 1994.
9.
TsingosN.FunkhouserT.NganA., and CarlbomI.Modeling acoustics in virtual environments using the uniform theory of diffraction. Proceedings of the 28thAnnual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) 2001, Los Angeles, CA USA, August 12–17 2001.
10.
JensenH. W.Realistic Image Synthesis Using Photon Mapping. A. K. Peters, Natick, MAUSA, 2001.
11.
KuttruffK. H.Auralization of impulse responses modeled on the basis of ray-tracing results. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 1993, 41(11), 876–880.
12.
CremerL., and MüllerH. A.Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics, volume 1. Applied Science Publishers LTD., Barking, Essex, UK, 1978.
13.
TsingosN.CarlbomI.ElkoG.FunkhouserT., and KubliB.Validation of acoustical simulations in the “Bell Labs Box”. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2002, 22(4), 28–37.
14.
SaviojaL.Modeling Techniques for Virtual Acoustics. PhD Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Telecommunications Software and Multimedia Laboratory, Helsinki, Finland, 1999.
15.
NosalE.HodgsonM., and AshdownI.Improved algorithms and methods for room sound-field prediction by acoustical radiosity in arbitrary polyhedral rooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(2), 2004, 970–980.
16.
FunkhouserT.TsingosN.CarlbomI.ElkoG.SondhiM.WestJ. E.PingaliG.MinP., and NganA.A beam tracing method for interactive architectural acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004, 115(2), 739–756.
17.
KleinerM.DalenbackD., and SvenssonP.Auralization – an overview. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 1993, 41(11), 861–875.
LamY. W.A comparison of three different diffuse reflection modeling methods used in room acoustic computer models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996, 100(4), 2181–2192.
20.
TorresR. R.SvenssonP., and KleinerM.Computation of edge diffraction for more accurate room acoustics auralization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 600–610, 2001.
21.
AllenJ. B., and BerkleyD. A.Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979, 65(4), 943–950.
22.
KrokstadA.StromS., and SorsdalS.Calculating the acoustical room response by the use of a ray tracing technique. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1968, 8(1), 118–125.
23.
BertramM.DeinesE.MohringJ.JegorovsJ., and HagenH.Phonon tracing for auralization and visualization of sound. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization Conference 2005, Minneapolis, MN. USA, October 23–28 2005.
24.
KapralosB.JenkinM., and MiliosE.Sonel mapping: A stochastic acoustical modeling system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2006, Toulouse, France, May14–19 2007.
25.
KapralosB.JenkinM., and MiliosE.Acoustical modeling with sonel mapping. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA) 2007, Madrid, Spain, September 2–7, 2007.
26.
KapralosB.JenkinM., and MiliosE.Acoustical modeling using a Russian roulette strategy. Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Barcelona, Spain, May 28–31 2005.
27.
FunkhouserT.TsingosN.CarlbomI.ElkoG.PingaliG.SondhiM., and WestJ. E.A beam tracing approach to acoustic modeling for interactive virtual environments. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH 1998), pages 21–32, Orlando, FL. USA, July 19–24 1998.
28.
KellerJ. B.Geometrical theory of diffraction. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1962, 52(2), 116–130.
29.
TsingosN., and GascuelJ. D.General model for the simulation of room acoustics. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) 1997, Los Angeles, CA. USA, August 3–8, 1997.
30.
TsingosN., and GascuelJ. D.Fast rendering of sound occlusion and diffraction effects for virtual acoustic environments. Proceedings of the 104th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 16–19 1998.
31.
CalamiaP. T., and SvenssonU. P.Fast time-domain edge-diffraction calculations for interactive acoustic simulations. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, Special Issue on Spatial Sound and Virtual Acoustics, 2007. Article ID 63560, 10 pages.
32.
MartensW. L.HerderJ., and ShibaY.A filtering model for effcient rendering of the spatial image of an occluded virtual sound source. Proceedings of the 137th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the 2nd Convention of the European Acoustics Association, page S54, Berlin, Germany, March 14–19 1999.
33.
XiangyangZ.KeanC., and JincaiS.On the accuracy of the ray-tracing algorithms based on various sound receiver models. Applied Acoustics, 2003, 64(4), 433–441.
34.
MehtaM.JohnsonJ., and RocafortJ.Architectural Acoustics Principles and Design.Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. USA, 1999.
35.
VorländerM.Simulation of the transient and steady-state sound propagation in rooms using a new combined ray-tracing/image-source algorithm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989, 86(1), 172–178.
36.
YangL. N., and ShieldB. M.Development of a ray tracing computer model for the prediction of the sound field in long enclosures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 229(1), 133–146.
37.
SvenssonU. P., and KristiansenU. R.Computational modeling and simulation of acoustic spaces. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Virtual, Synthetic and Entertainment Audio, pages 11–30, Espoo, Finland, 2002.
38.
BentleyJ. L.Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Communications of the ACM, 1975, 18(9), 509–517.
39.
BassH. E.SutherlandL. C., and ZuckerwarA. J.Atmospheric absorption of sound: Update. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990, 88(4), 2019–2021
40.
SilvermanB. W.Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, England, 1986.
41.
KapralosB.JenkinM., and MiliosE.Diffraction modeling for interactive virtual acoustical environment. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (GRAPP 2007), Barcelona, Spain, March 8–11 2007.
42.
DanceS. M., and ShieldB. M.Modeling of sound fields in enclosed spaces with absorbent room surfaces. Part I: Performance spaces. Applied Acoustics, 1999, 58(1), 1–18.
43.
LamY. W.A Comparison of three different diffuse reflection modeling methods used in room acoustic computer models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996, 100(4), 2181–2192.
44.
SchroederM. R.New method for measuring reverberation time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 37(3), 409–412.
45.
MartensW. L.Rapid psychophysical calibration using bisection scaling for individualized control of source elevation in auditory display. Proceedings of International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD) 2002, pages 1–8, Kyoto, Japan, July 2–5 2002.
46.
MartensW. L.Psychophysical calibration for controlling the range of a virtual sound source: Multidimensional complexity in spatial auditory display. International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD) 2001, pages 1–12, Espoo, Finland, July 29 -August 1 2001.
