Modelling of Scattering from Balcony Fronts

Abstract

Balconies are normally used in large auditoria such as concert halls or opera houses, to increase seating capacity or to give better view for a distinguished group of the audience. When ray-tracing based computer models are applied to study the acoustical quality of these auditoria, the alteration of the sound field due to balcony fronts is normally unobservable, because of the relative small size of the balcony fronts in the auditorium. Furthermore, most diffuse reflection ray-tracing methods are not based on direct wave acoustics but on an approximation of the scattering effect. In practice, experience shows that balcony fronts give additional warmth to music. This effect is more prominent when singers perform in traditional horseshoe shaped opera houses with multi-levels balconies. This paper describes modelling of scattering from balcony fronts using a theoretical wave approach, in which the incident wave front is not plane but spherical. A computer simulation illustrates the scattering of sound that takes place when the wavefront impinges on the surface of the balcony fronts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Egan

M.D.

, Architectural Acoustics , McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988, Chap. 3, pp. 144–146.

Barron

, Balcony overhangs in concert auditoria, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. , 95 (1995) 2580–2589.

Naylor

G.M.

, ODEON – Another hybrid room acoustical model, Appl. Acoust. 38 (1993) 131–143.

Edwards

, Considering concert acoustics and the shape of rooms, Architectural Record , August (1984) 133–137.

Edwards

, and Kahn

, Why do traditional opera houses work so well for opera? In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th Meeting of the Acoust. Soc. Amer. (1998) 333–334.

Lam

Y.W.

, A comparison of three diffuse reflection modelling methods used in room acoustics computer models, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 100 (1996) 2181–2192.

Beranek

L.L.

, Concert and Opera Halls: How They Sound , Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1996, Chap. 16, pp. 523–538.

Dalenback

Kleiner

, and Svensson

, A macroscopic view of diffuse reflection, J. Audio Eng. Soc. 42 (1994) 793–807.

Hodgson

, Evidence of diffuse surface reflections in rooms, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 89 (1991) 765–771.

10.

Morse

P.M.

, Vibration and Sound , Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1991, Chap. 7.29, pp. 346–359.

11.

Junger

M.C.

, and Fiet

, Sound, Structures, and Their Interaction , Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1993, Chap. 5, pp. 109–112 and Chap. 10, pp. 334–338.

12.

Pierce

A.D.

, Acoustics–An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications , Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1991, Chap. 5, pp. 213–217.

13.

Chan

T.M.

, and Elliott

S.J.

, Limitations of active sound control systems due to structural/acoustic coupling, Proceedings of the ACTIVE 97, 21–23 Aug., Budapest, Hungary (1997) 239–254.

14.

Kinsler

L.E.

Frey

A.R.

Coppens

A.B.

, and Sanders

J.V.

, Fundamentals of Acoustics , John Wiley & Sons, Singapore, 1982, 3rd ed., Chap. 8, pp. 163–199.

15.

Greene

, Loudspeakers as ripple tank wave generators, Am. J. Physics 45 (1977) 683–4.

16.

Xie

Q.C.

, and Li

Z.D.

, A ripple tank demonstration of the condition for interference of waves, Am. J. Physics 56 (1988) 745–6.

17.

Knudsen

V.O.

, and Harris

C.M.

, Acoustical Designing in Architecture , Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1988, pp. 178–183.