A Computer Investigation of the Performance of Virtual Reflectors: Part 1

Abstract

In a companion paper [1] a technique for improving acoustic conditions in open stage auditoria by means of virtual reflectors has been proposed. Possible methods of testing the application of a virtual reflector system were discussed and it was concluded that computer simulation was the most appropriate. However, before employing a commercially available package it was necessary to devise suitable procedures.

The need for both a directional loudspeaker and a directional microphone is an essential requirement for the virtual reflector system but most computer simulation packages only allow for source directivity. Hence a method of incorporating the effect of microphone directivity using the principle of reciprocity was developed. The basis of establishing the gain factor has been devised and it is proposed that the convolution of echograms rather than the convolution of true impulse responses can be employed to predict system performance.

The action of the virtual reflector system has been investigated using a model of an open stage theatre. Both system microphone and system loudspeaker were selected from a catalogue of available modern commercial sound equipment. The resulting STI contours demonstrated that the effect of the virtual reflector over the audience area to the rear of a human speaker was to raise the speech intelligibility to be approximately equal to that to the front of the speaker.

It has been shown that the STI at the rear of a speaker with the virtual reflector system in operation does not increase significantly with gain. This is due to the Modulation Transfer Functions which determine the STI value being determined by the convolution of two impulse responses multiplied by a gain factor and added to a third impulse response. The resulting impulse response therefore consists of many ‘reflections’ and hence the MTF's and STI values will be adversely affected if excess gain is applied.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oldham

D. J.

and El-Zeky

, ‘The Use of Virtual Reflectors to Improve Speech Intelligibility in Open Stage Auditoria’, Building Acoustics, Vol. 5 (1), 57–68, 1998.

Krokstad

Strom

and Sorsdal

‘Calculating the acoustical room response by use of a ray tracing technique’, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 8 (1), 118–125, 1968.

Krokstad

Strom

and Sorsdal

“Fifteen years' experience with computerized ray tracing’, Applied Acoustic, Vol. 16, 291–312, 1983.

Kulowski

‘Algorothmic representation of the ray tracing technique’

Applied Acoustic, Vol. 18, 449–469, 1985.

Ondet

and Barbry

J.L.

, ‘Modelling of sound propagation in fitted workshops using ray tracing’, 5.J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 85 (2), 787–796, 1989.

Gibbs

B.M.

and Jones

D.K.

, ‘A Simple Image Method for Calculating the distribution of sound pressure levels within an Enclosure’ Acustica, Vol. 26, 24–32, 1972.

Allen

J.B.

Berkley

D. A.

, ‘Image method for efficiently simulating small room acoustics’ J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 65 (4), 934–950, 1979.

Kirszenstein

, ‘An Image Source computer model for room acoustics. Analysis and electroacoustic simulation’ Applied Acoustics, 275–290, 1984.

Borish

, ‘Extension of the image model to arbitrary polyhedral’ J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75(6), June 1984.

10.

Lee

and Lee

B.-H.

‘An efficient algorithm for the image model technique’

Applied Acoustics, Vol. 24, 87, 1988.

11.

Vorländer

, ‘Simulation of the transient and steady-state sound propagation in rooms using a new combined ray-tracing/image-source algorithm’ J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 86, 1, 172–178, 1989.

12.

van Maercke

and Martin

, ‘The prediction of echograms and impulse responses within the Epidaure software’ Applied Acoustics, Vol. 38, 93–114, 1993.

13.

Lewers

, ‘A combined beam tracing and radiant exchange computer model of room acoustics’ Applied Acoustics, Vol. 38, 161–178, 1993.

14.

Naylor

G.M.

, ‘Treatment of early and late reflections in a hybrid computer model for room acoustics’ Presented as paper 3aAA2 at the 124th ASA meeting, New Orleans, November 1992.

15.

Naylor

G.M.

, ‘ODEON- Another hybrid room acoustical model’ Applied Acoustics, Vol. 38, 131–143, 1993.

16.

RAYNOISE User's Manual, Revision 2.1, Numeric Integration Technologies, Belgium, December 1994.

17.

Houtgast

Steeneken

H.J.M.

and Plomp

‘Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Rooms from the Modulation Transfer Function. I. General Room Acoustics’, Acustica, Vol. 46, pp.60–72, 1980.

18.

Plomp

Steeneken

H.J.M.

and Houtgast

‘Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Rooms from the Modulation Transfer Function. II. Mirror Image Computer model applied to rectangular rooms’, Acustica, Vol. 46, pp.74–81, 1980.

19.

Plomp

van Rietschote

H.F.

and Steeneken

H.J.M.

‘Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Rooms from the Modulation Transfer Function. III. Mirror Image Computer model applied to pyramidal rooms’, Acustica, Vol. 48, pp.320–324, 1981.

20.

van Rietschote

H.F.

Houtgast

and Steeneken

H.J.M.

‘Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Rooms from the Modulation Transfer Function. IV. Answer Ray-Tracing Computer model’, Acustica, Vol. 49, pp.245–252, 1981.

21.

van Rietschote

H.F.

and Steeneken

H.J.M.

‘Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Rooms from the Modulation Transfer Function. V.The merits of the ray-tracing model versus general room acoustics’, Acustica, Vol. 53, pp.72–78, 1983.

22.

Steeneken

H.J.M.

and Houtgast

‘A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality’

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 67 (1), pp. 318–326, 1980.

23.

Barron

‘Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design’. 1st ed. Published by E & FN Spon, London 1993.

24.

Oldham

D J

, ‘A technique for assessing the perormance of special reflectors in thrust stage theatres’, Acoustics Letters, Vol 4, No 8, p150–156. (1981)

25.

Tanner

R H

, ‘The acoustical design and performance of the Stratford (Ontario) Festival Theatre’. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 32, 2, p232–234 (1960).

26.

Thiele

, ‘Richtungsverteilung und zeitfolge der Schallruckwurfe in Raumen’ Acustica, vol. 3, p. 291, 1953.

27.

Meng

X W

De Borger

Van Overmeire

, ‘Numerical analysis of the acoustical quality of a multi-purpose hall’. Building Acoustics, Vol 2, 3, p488–504 (1995).

28.

Oldham

D. J.

and El-Zeky

, ‘A Computer Investigation of the Performance of Virtual Reflectors: Part II: The Effect of Room Conditions’, Submitted to Building Acoustics (1999).

A Computer Investigation of the Performance of Virtual Reflectors: Part 1 - Development of the Method

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References