This paper examines and compares acid rain and climate change policy making in Canada. It presents a brief model of ecological problem-solving under scientific uncertainty, in which problem identification, problem implication and problem solution are viewed as a complex social process. Ecological problem-solving is usually an open debate in which a plurality of actors participate. Building on interactionist studies, the paper presents these social actors as belonging to different but interacting social worlds. Their interactions lead to the construction of an ecological discourse which frames policy choices. Compared to the acid rain policy process, climate change policy process is marked by a closer participation of the scientific community; a change in policy instruments emphasising market and voluntary measures instead of ‘command and control’ ones; a perceived need for a wider public and social interests involvement in the policy process; ethical considerations and equity issues framed in intra and inter-generational terms; and participants' perception of a considerable challenge for technological development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonP. R. and IngelhartR. (1995), Value Change in Global Perspective, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.
2.
BenedickR. (1991), Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
3.
BlumeS.BundersJ.LeydesdorffL., and WhitleyR., eds (1987), The Social Direction of the Public Sciences: Causes and Consequences of Cooperation between Scientists and Nonscientific Groups, Dordecht, Nl, Reidel.
4.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, (1993), “Science Policy, the IPCC and the Climate Convention: The Codification of a Global Research Agenda”, Energy and Environment, 4: 362–407.
5.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, (1994), “Global Climate Protection Policy: The Limits of Scientific Expertise and Advice”, Global Environmental Change, Part 1: 4: 140–159; part 2: 185–200.
6.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, (1995), “Britain and the International Panel on Climate Change: The Impact of Scientific Advice on Global Warming. Part 1: Integrated Policy Analysis and the Global Dimension; Part 2: The Domestic Story of the British Response to Climate Change”, Environmental Politics, 4, 1: 1–18 and 4, 2: 175–196.
7.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, (1996), “Political Pressure in the Formation of Scientific Consensus”, in: EmsleyJ., ed. The Global Warming Debate, London, The European Science and Environment Forum: 234–248.
8.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, (1997), “Uncertainty in the Service of Science: Between Science Policy and the Politics of Power”, in: FermannG., ed., International Politics of Climate Change, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press: 110–152.
9.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, and SkeaJ. (1991), Acid Politics: Environmental and Energy Policies in Britain and Germany, London, Belhaven Press.
10.
BrunnerR. D. (1991), “Global Climate Change: Defining the Policy Problem”, Policy Sciences, 24: 291–311.
11.
Canada (1997), Canada's Second National Report on Climate Change, Ottawa, Department of Environment.
12.
CarrollJ. E. (1983), Environmental Diplomacy. An Examination and a Prospective of Canadian-US Transboundary Environmental Relations, Ann Arbor, MI, The University of Michigan Press.
13.
CataldoE. (1992), “Acid Rain in the United States: An Exploration of Canadian Influence”, The Social Science Journal, 29, 4: 395–409.
14.
ClarkeA. and GersonE. M. (1990), “Symbolic Interactionism in Social Studies of Science”, in: BeckerH. S. and McCallM. M., eds, Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press: 178–214.
CollinsR. (1994), Four Sociological Traditions, New York, Oxford University Press.
17.
CowardH. and HurkaT., eds, (1993), Ethics and Climate Change: The Greenhouse Effect, Waterloo, Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
18.
CowlingE. B. (1982), “Acid Precipitation in Historical Perspective”, Environmental Science and Technology, 16: 110–123.
19.
FermannnG. ed. (1997), International Politics of Climate Change: Key Issues and Critical Actors, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press.
20.
ForsterB. (1993), The Acid Rain Debate: Science and Special Interests in Policy Debate, Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press.
21.
FrizzellA. and PammettJ. H., eds (1997), Shades of Green. Environmental Attitudes in Canada and around the World, Ottawa, Carleton University Press.
22.
GatesW. L. (1996), “Climate Models. Evaluation”, in: HoughtonJ. T., Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambrige University Press: 233–284.
23.
Gouvernement du Canada (1991), “Lés dépôts acides: Une attaque insidieuse”, in: L'état de l'environnement au Canada, Ottawa, Ministre des Approvisionnements et Services: 24–1 to 24–26.
24.
GuayL.“La réponse socio-politique au message scientifique sur le réchauffement climatique”, Sciences de la Société, 41: 40–57.
25.
HaasP. M. (1990), Saving the Mediterranean, The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation, New York, Columbia University Press.
26.
HaasP. M. (1992), “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone”, International Organization, 46: 187–224.
27.
HaasP. M.KeohaneR. O. and LevyM. A. eds, (1993), Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
28.
HajerM. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
29.
HartD. M. and VictorD. J., (1993), “Scientific Elites and the Making of US Policy for Climate Change”, Social Studies of Science, 23: 643–680.
30.
HerrickC. and JamiesonD. (1995), “The Social Construction of Acid Rain. Some Implications for Science/Policy Assessment”, Global Environmental Change, 5, 2: 105–112.
31.
HobergG. (1997), “Governing the Environment: Comparing Canada and the United States”, in: BantingK.HobergG. and SimeonR. eds, Degrees of Freedom: Canada and the United States in a Changing World, Montréal, McGill/Queen's University Press: 341–388.
32.
HobergG. and HarrisonK (1994), “It's not Easy Being Green: The Politics of Canada's Green Plan”, Canadian Public Policy, 20: 119–137.
33.
HowletM. and RameshM. (1995), Studying Public Policy, Toronto, Oxford University Press.
34.
IngelhartR. (1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
35.
IngelhartR. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
JamiesonD. (1992), “Ethics, Public Policy, and Global Warming”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 17: 134–153.
38.
JasanoffS. (1990), The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
39.
JonesM. D. H. and Henderson-SellersA., (1990), “History of the Greenhouse Effect”, Progress in Physical Geography, 14: 1–18.
40.
LanchberryJ. and VictorD. (1995), “The Role of Science in the Global Climate Negotiations”, Green Globe Yearbook, 1995: 29–39.
41.
LatourB. and WoolgarS. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
42.
LiftinK. (1994), Ozone Discourses. Science and Politics in Global Environment Cooperation, New York, Columbia University Press.
43.
LynesJ. and GibsonR. (1998) “Voluntary Corporate Initiatives for Environmental Improvement”, Alternatives, 24, 3: 18–19.
44.
MolA. P. J. (1995), The Refinement of Production: Ecological Modernization Theory and the Chemical Industry, Utrecht, Nl, International Books.
45.
MulkayM. (1976), “The Mediating Role of the Scientific Elite”, Social Studies of Science, 6: 442–470.
46.
MuntonD. (1998), “Dispelling the Myths of the Acid Rain Story”, Environment, 40, 6: 4–7 and 27–34.
47.
ParkC. (1989), Acid Rain: Rhetoric and Reality, London, Routledge/Methuen.
48.
O'RiordanT. and JägerJ., eds (1996), Politics of Climate Change. A European Perspective, London, Routledge.
49.
PradesJ.TessierR. and VaillancourtJ.-G. eds (1994), Aspects sociaux des précipitations acides au Québec, Montréal, Université de Montréal.
50.
RegensJ. L. and RycroftR. W. (1988), The Acid Rain Controversy, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Press.
51.
RoqueploP. (1988), Pluies acides: Menaces pour l'Europe, Paris, Economica.
52.
RoqueploP. (1995), Climats sous surveillance. Limites et conditions de l'expertise scientifique, Paris, Economica.
53.
SalterL. (1988), Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards, Dordrecht, Nl, Kluwer.
54.
ShackleyS. and WynneB. (1995), “Integrating Knowledges for Climate Change: Pyramids, Nets and Uncertainties”, Global Environmental Change, 5: 113–126.
55.
ShackleyS. and WynneB. (1996), “Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-ordering Devices and Authority”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 21: 275–302.
56.
SimonisU. E. (1989), “Ecological Modernization of Industrial Society: Three Strategic Elements”, International Social Science Journal, 121: 347–361.
SpaargarenG. and MolA. P. J. (1992), “Sociology, Environment, and Modernity: Ecological Modernization as a Theory of Social Change”, Society and Natural Resources, 5: 323–344.
59.
SchwanenD. (1997), Confronting the Greenhouse Challenge: Matching Protection with Risk, Toronto, C. D. Howe Institute.
60.
StraussA. (1985), Social Organization of Medical Work, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
61.
TessierR. (1996), L'éthique d'une société face aux pluies acides. Le cas du Québec, Québec, Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
62.
ThrogmortonJ. A. (1995). “Ethics, Passion, Reason and Power: The Rhetoric of Electric Power Planning in Chicago”, in: HendlerS. ed. A Reader in Planning Ethics, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy.
63.
TimmermanP. (1996), “Breathing Room: Negociations on Climate Change”, in: HampsonF. O. and ReppyJ., eds, Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press: 221–244.
64.
UngarS. (1992), “The Rise and (Relative) Decline of Global Warming as a Social Problem”, Sociological Quaterly, 33, 4: 483–501.
65.
WealeA. (1992), The New Politics of Pollution, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
66.
WealeA. (1993), “Ecological Modernization and Integration of European Environmental Policy”, in: LiefferinkJ. D. eds, European Integration and Environmental Policy, London, Belhaven Press: 197–216.
67.
WeartS. R. (1997), “Global Warming, Cold War, and the Evolution of Research Plans”, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 27: 319–356.
68.
WhitleyR. (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
69.
WoodG. P. H. (1983), The Politics of Environmental Regulation: Acid Rain in Ontario, Kingston, On, Queen's University, PhD dissertation.
70.
WynneB. (1992), “Risk and Social Learning: Reification to Engagement”, in: KrimskyS. and GoldingD. eds, Theories of Risk, New York, Praeger: 275–297.
71.
YearleyS. (1991), The Green Case: A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics, London, Harper Collins.
72.
ZehrS. C. (1994a), “Flexible Interpretations of Acid Rain and the Construction of Scientific Uncertainty in Political Settings”, Politics and the Life Sciences, 13: 205–216.
73.
ZehrS. C. (1994b), “The Centrality of Scientists and the Translation of Interest in U. S. Acid Rain Controversy”, Revue canadienne de sociologie et d'anthropologie, 31, 3: 325–353.
