The greenhouse hypothesis, the reasons for the present global warming and the merits of the Kyoto Protocol are subject to heated debate. Whereas some question what bizarre relations between science and government have allowed politicians to treat a highly controversial hypothesis as though it were proven, others supply the public and the politicians with what appears akin to propaganda in the name of science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
“The Greenhouse Reviewed”, Vol.2, Issue 6, 1998.
2.
“The Carbon Dioxide Thermometer”, CalderNigel. SPRU Seminar, University of Sussex, Brighton, England 10/06/98.
3.
“The Arithmetic of Ice Ages”, CalderNigel, Nature, vol 252, pp. 216–218 (1974)
4.
“Variations in Cosmic Ray Flux and Global Cloud Coverage – A Missing Link in Solar-Climate Relationships”, SvensmarkH. and Friis-ChristensenE., Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 59, pp. 1225–1232 (1997)
5.
“A Concise Dictionary of Chemistry”; Oxford University Press; Market House Limited1990
6.
The changes in global temperature (T,°F) and emissions of man-made CO2 (billions of tons per year) from 1910 to 1997 – according to UNEP and WMO
7.
From “TheAbsurdity of Kyoto”The Greenhouse Reviewed, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 1999 Edited by MathiesenMikhel
