AaldersMVC and Van AchtRJJ, (eds), Afspraken i71 het milleurecht (Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1992).
2.
AdebavaleM, “Climate change and taxation policy in Britain – an overview”, [1998] Environmental Taxation and Accounting, issue 1, 62–68.
3.
BaumolWJ and OatesW, The theory of environmental policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
4.
BockenH and TraestI, (eds), Milieubeleidsovereenkomsten (Brussels: E. Story-Scientia, 1991).
5.
De ClercqM, “The implementation of green taxes: The Belgian experience”, in Environmental taxes and charges – National experiences and plans (Dublin: European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, 1996), 45–66.
6.
de WitW, Nationale milieubelastingen en het F,G-Verdrag (Deventer: Kluwer, 1997).
7.
DeketelaereK, “The use of economic instruments in the European environmental policy”, [1993] Elsa Law Review, 45–67 [Deketelaere, 1993, I].
8.
DeketelaereK, “The use of economic instruments in the European environmental policy”, [1993] Elsa Law Review, 45–67 [Deketelaere, 1993, II].
9.
DeketelaereK, “Towards a European environmental tax law: Greenspeak?”, in AbrahamFDeketelaereKStuyckJ (eds), Recent economic and legal developments in European environmental policy (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1995) L Deketelaere, 1995, I].
10.
DeketelaereK, Naar een E:wropese milieuf scaliteit – Het gebruik van f scale instrumenten in het Europees milieubeleid (doctoraal proefschrift), (Leuven Institute for Environmental and Energy Law,] 995) (Towards a European environmental tax law – The use of fiscal instruments in the European environmental policy (hereafter: Doctoral thesis) [Deketelaere, 1995, II].
11.
DeketelaereK, “European environmental tax policy: Proposal for a policy vision and a legal framework”, [1996] European Environmental Law Review, 9–16.
12.
DeketelaereK, “European environmental and spatial planning, [1997]”European Environmental Law Review, 278–286 and 307–317 [Deketelaere, 1997, I].
13.
DeketelaereK, “The European Union and fiscal environmental policy instruments – Policy tracks for the future European environmental policy”, [1997] Environmental Taxation and Accounting, issue 3, 8–20 [Deketelaere, 1997,1I].
14.
DeketelaereK, “Voluntary environmental agreements: European Community viewpoints”, in X, European Union Environmental Law (Helsinki: Finnish Society for Environmental Law, 1998), 81–125 [Deketelaere, 1998, I]].
15.
DeketelaereK, “New environmental policy instruments in Belgium”, in GolubJ (ed), New instruments for environmental protection in the EU (London: Routledge, 1998) [Deketelaere, 1998, II].
16.
DenteB, (ed), Environmental policy in seareh of new instruments (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).
17.
Elni, (ed), International environmental impact assessment European and comparative – Law and practical experience (London: Cameron May, 1997).
18.
GainesSE and WestinRA, Taxation for environmental protection a multi-national legal study (Connecticut: Quorum books, 1991);.
19.
GeeD, “Eco-nomic tax reform in Europe”, [1997] Environmental Taxation and Accounting, issue 1, 21–26.
20.
GolubJ, (ed), New instruments for environmental policy in the EU (London/New York: Routledge, 1998).
21.
GuppesGVan der VogtEVan der NaaldWMansonP and VonkemanG, New market-onented instruments for environmental policies (London: Graham and Trotman, 1992).
22.
GuscuoloA, “Environmental policy and fiscal policy in the Community: The challenge of national eco-taxes”, [1998] Environmental Taxation and Accounting, issue 3, 52–70 and issue 4, 10–30.
23.
HamiltonC, “Ecological tax reform in Australia”, [1998] Environmental ‘taxation and Accounting, issue 2, 9–42 and issue 3, 13–37.
24.
HelmD, (ed), Economic policy towards the environment (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991).
25.
JadotB and De SadeleerN, (eds), Le label écologique et le droit (Brussels: E. Story-Scientia, 1993).
26.
JenkinsGP and LamechR, “Fiscal policies to control pollution: International experience”, [1992] Bulletin, 483–502 [Jenkins, I].
27.
JenkinsGP and LamechR, “Market-based incentive instruments for pollution control”, [1992] Bulletin, 527–536 [Jenkins, II].
28.
KlokPI, Convenanten als instrument van milieuheleid (Enschede, 1989).
29.
LockhartJA, “Environmental tax subsidies in the United States”, [1998] Environmental Taxation and Accounting, issue 2, 43–54.
PaulusA, The feasibility of ecological taxation (Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Maklu, 1995).
32.
PearsonM and SmithS, The European carbon tax: An assessment of the European Commission's proposal (London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1991).
33.
PittevilsI, “Ecotaxes on products in Belgium: The need for a proper point of imposition”, in X, Environmental taxes and charges – National experiences and plans (Dublin: European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, 1996), 201–210.
34.
PlatteauH and DeclerckB, Milieuaudit en Accounting (Brussels: Kluwer Editorial, 1998).
35.
RoseI, “EU initiatives to control air pollution: Taxation of energy products”, [1998] International Business Lawyer436–440.
36.
RosembuyT, “Issues on European environmental taxation”, [1998] Environmental Taxation and Accountingissue 3, 71–83.
37.
Rowan-RobinsonJ, “The use of taxes to achieve environmental goals in Britain”, [1998] Environmental Taxation and Accounting, issue 2, 61–66.
38.
SchlegelmilchK, (ed), Green budget reform in Europe (Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 1998).
39.
ShomeP, “A 21st century global carbon tax”, [1998] Environmental Taxation and Accountingissue 1, 11–29.
40.
SmithS, “‘Green’ tax reforms and road transport in Britain and Germany”, [1997] Environmental Taxation and Accountingissue 3, 21–37.
41.
SmithS, “Creen”taxes and charges: Policy and practice in Britain and Germany (London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1995).
42.
ThieffryP, “Les nouveaux instruments juridiques de la politique communautaire de l'environnement”, [1992] Revue Trimestriel de droit Européen669–685.
43.
TindaleS and HolthamG, Green tax reform (London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 1996).
44.
Van CalsterG, “State aid for environmental protection: Has the EC shut the door?”, [1998] Environmental Taxation & Accounting, issue 3, 38–51.
45.
Van HumbeekP, “Environmental taxation in Flanders”, [1997] Environmental taxation and Accountingissue 4, 52–64.
46.
VermeendW and Van der VaartJ, 'Greening taxes – the Dutch model (Deventer: Kluwer, 1998).
47.
WettersteinP, (ed), Harm to the environment: The right to compensation and the assessment of damages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
48.
CEDRE, L'evaluation des incidences sur l ‘environnement: Un progrés juridique? (Brussels: CEDRE, 1991) [CEDRE. 1991].
49.
CEDRE, L'introduction des écotaxes en droit belge (Brussels: CEDRE, 1994) L CEDRE, 1994].
50.
EC, 1992 – The environmental dimension – Task force report on the environment and the internal market (Bonn: EC, 1990) [EC, 1990, I].
51.
EC, Report of the working group of experts from the Member States on the use of economic and fiscal instruments in EC environmental policy (Brussels: EC, 1990) [EC, 1990, II].
52.
EC, The environmental imperative – declaration by the European Council (Dublin: EC, 1990) L EC, 1990, III].
53.
EC, White paper on growth compehtiveness and employment (Luxembourg: EC, 1993) [EC, 1993].
54.
EC, Waste-water charge schemes in the European Union (Brussels/Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC, 1995) [EC, 1995].
55.
EC, European Community environment legislation – volumes 1–7 (Luxembourg: EC, 1996) [EC, 1996].
56.
EC, Tax provisions with a potential impact on environmental protection (Luxembourg: EC, 1997) [EC, 1997].
57.
EEA, Environmental taxes – Implementation and environmental effectiveness (Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 1996) [EEA, 1996].
58.
EFILWC, Environmental taxes and charges National experiences and plans (Dublin: European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, 1996) [EFILWC, 1996].
59.
IISD, Making budgets green (Winnipeg: IISD, 1994) [IISD, 1994, I].
60.
IISD, The greening of government taxes and suhsidies (Winnipeg: IISD, 1994) [IISD, 1994, II].
61.
NCM, The use of economic instruments in Nordic environmental policy (Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 1996) [NCM, 1996].
62.
OECD, Environment and economics (Paris: OECD, 1985) [OECD, 1985].