Aggressive efficiency improvements and a shift away from fossil fuels cannot offset climate change threats. This realization creates an imperative for ‘carbon-negative’ mitigation measures; that is, measures that can reduce atmospheric carbon faster than emissions will load the atmosphere. Among such measures, air extraction technology, coupled with secure sequestration, offers advantages of centralization and control without direct intervention in the biosphere or major collateral environmental impact. Significant new scientific developments in air extraction show promise of greatly reduced costs, such that decreasing the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere to substantially lower risk levels may be economically practicable. These developments create a strong case for expanded R&D efforts aimed at advancing air extraction technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NakicenovicN., Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000
2.
The IPCC has commissioned the development of new scenarios to serve as common starting points for climate and integrated assessment models for a future Fifth Assessment Report. Among these potential new scenarios are emissions profiles reflecting carbon-negative measures taken later in the 21st century, in addition to more familiar mitigation actions taken earlier in the century (e.g., Scenario ‘IMAGE 2.6’ in Emissions Categories I/II; van VuurenD.P., Climatic Change2007, 81,119). The technical feasibility and robustness of these scenarios has not yet been established by the IPCC, and it is not yet known which will be adopted as a new low pathway scenario. For further information, refer to IPCC-XXVIII/Doc.8 (19.III.2008), Further Work on Scenarios: Report From the IPCC Expert Meeting Towards New Scenarios for Analyses of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies, September 19–21, 2007, Noorwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
3.
PacalaS. and SocolowR., Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technology, Science, 2004, 305, 968–972
BuesselerK.O., Ocean Iron Fertilization – Moving Forward in a Sea of Uncertainty, Science, 2008, 319, 162
6.
MatthewsH.D. and CaldeiraK., Transient Climate-Carbon Simulations of Planetary Geoengineering, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences, 2007, published on line, doi:10.1073/pnas0700419104
7.
KraxnerF.NilssonS., and ObersteinerM., Negative Emissions from BioEnergy Use (BECS) – The Case for Biomass Production by Sustainable Forest Management from Semi-natural Temperate Forests, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 24, 285–296
8.
LacknerK.S.ZiockH.-J., and GrimesP., Carbon Dioxide Extraction from the Air: Is it an Option?, in: SakkestadB., ed., Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Coal Technology Association, Gaithersburg, MD USA, 1999, 885–896
9.
LacknerK.S., Climate Change: A Guide to CO2 Sequestration, Science, 2003, 300, 1677–1678
10.
StolaroffJ.K.KeithD.W., and LowryG.V., Carbon Dioxide Capture from Atmospheric Air Using Sodium Hydroxide Spray, Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42, 2728–2735
11.
WrightA.B. and LacknerK.S., Method and Apparatus for Extracting Carbon Dioxide from Air, U.S. Patent Application 20080087165, published 4/17/08; Lackner, K. S., Thermodynamics of the Humidity Swing Driven Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide, to be published
12.
EisenbergerP.M., Process for Air Extraction of CO2 Using Immobilized Adsorbents, to be published
13.
Little Green Data Book 2007, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2007
14.
Emissions From Fuel Combustion, Vol. 2007 release 01, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2007
15.
System for the Analysis of Global Markets, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington DC, 2007
16.
The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2030, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Irving TX, 2007
17.
PielkeR.A.Jr.WigleyT.M.L., and GreenC., Dangerous Assumptions, Nature, 2008, 452, 531–532
18.
RoeG.H. and BakerM.B., Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?, Science, 2007, 318, 629–632
NordhausW., A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press, New Haven CT, 2008
21.
KeithD.W.Ha-DuongM., and StolaroffJ.K., Climate Strategy with CO2 Capture from the Air, Climatic Change, 2005, 74, 17–74
22.
PielkeR. A.Jr., 2009 (in press). An Idealized Assessment of the Economics of Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide in Mitigation Policy, Environmental Science & Policy, 2009 (in press) of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy. Environ. Sci. Policy (2009), doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.002
The carbon cycle model is an impulse response function representation of the Bern CC model employed in the IPCC-TAR (2001) (F. Joos, University of Bern). Because fossil fuels are not the only source of CO2 emissions, the calculated atmospheric concentrations presented here are slightly lower than those published for the various scenarios by the reference Bern CC model.
25.
HoffertM.H., Energy Implications of Future Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content, Nature, 1998, 395, 881–884
26.
HoffertM.H., Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet, Science, 2002, 298, 981–987
27.
WigleyT.M.L.RichelsR., and EdmondsJ. A., Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content, Nature, 1996, 240, 240–243
28.
GDP Release 03-27-08, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, 2007
29.
AusubelJ.H. and MarchettiC., The Evolution of Transport, The Industrial Physicist, 2001, 7, 20–24
30.
AusubelJ.H.MarchettiC., and MeyerP.S., Toward Green Mobility: The Evolution of Transport, European Review, 1998, 6, 143–162
31.
AbanadesJ.C., Special Report, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005, Chapters 5–7
GrayM.L., Performance of Immobilized Tertiary Amine Solid Sorbents for the Capture of Carbon Dioxide, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 2, 3–8
35.
HicksJ.C., Designing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas – Hyperbranched Aminosilicas Capable of Capturing CO2 Reversibly, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2002–2003
36.
HuangH.Y.YangR.T.ChinnD., and MunsonC.L., Amine-grafted MCM-48 and Silica Xerogel as Superior Sorbents for Acidic Gas Removal From Natural Gas, Ind. & Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42, 2427–2433
37.
HarlickP.J.E. and SayariA., Applications of Pore-Expanded Mesoporous Silica.5. Triamine Grafted Material With Exceptional CO2 Dynamic and Equilibrium Adsorption Performance, Ind. & Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46, 446–458
38.
Ref. 31, Summary for Policy Makers and Chapter 5, Section 5.3.7
39.
Energy Technology Perspectives, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2008
