Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are a relatively novel way to promote renewable energy projects in the United States. Though more than half the states and the District of Columbia have taken the lead in mandating some form of RPS, none of the existing state programs are alike. The author proposes federal action to fix many of the problems plaguing individual state RPS programs and to persuade national policymakers, industries, and consumers to make a long-term commitment to renewable energy. If implemented properly, a nation-wide RPS could lower electricity rates for many consumers and utilities and may even induce more diversification in the electric utility industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SovacoolB.K. and CooperC., Big is Beautiful: The Case for Federal Leadership on a National Renewable Portfolio Standard, Electricity Journal, 2007, 20(4), 48.
2.
RaderN.A. and ShortW.P., Competitive Retail Markets: Tenuous Ground for Renewable Energy, Electricity Journal, 1998, 11, 72.
3.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2006: With Projections to 2030, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2006, 81.
4.
EngelK.H., The Dormant Commerce Clause Threat to Market-Based Environmental Regulation: The Case of Electricity Deregulation, Ecology Law Quarterly, 1999, 26, 243–249.
5.
RallsM.A., Congress Got it Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, Energy Law Journal, 2006, 27, 451–472.
6.
CooperC. and SovacoolB.K., Renewing America: The Case for a National Renewable Portfolio Standard, Network for Energy Choices, New York, 2007, 24–81.
7.
Cooper and Sovacool2007.
8.
Cooper and Sovacool2007.
9.
CostelloK., Regulatory Discretion in Implementing Renewable Portfolio Standards: The Case of Hawaii, Electricity Journal, 2005, 18(5), 51–53.
10.
U.S. Department of Energy, State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Purchase Requirements, Transportation Handbook, Washington, DC, 2006; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Power Technologies Energy Data Book, Golden, CO, 2006.
11.
MyersT., A guide to Initiative 937: Washington Energy Quotas, Washington Policy Center Report, October, 2006, 13.
12.
Cooper and Sovacool2007, 55.
13.
LangnissO. and WiserR., The Renewables Portfolio Standard in Texas: An Early Assessment, Energy Policy, 2001, 31, 533.
14.
RaderN., The Hazards of Implementing Renewables Portfolio Standards, Energy & Environment, 2000, 11(4), 391–405.
15.
RaderN.HemplingS., The Renewables Portfolio Standard: A Practical Guide, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington, DC, 2001.
16.
FlavinC.SawinJ.L.PodestaJ.CohenA.U.HendricksB., American Energy: The Renewable Path to Energy Security, Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, 2006.
FineD. & WangD, Private Equity and the Repeal of PUHCA, Electric Power and Light, 2005.
20.
HemplingS.RaderN., State Implementation of Renewables Portfolio Standards: A Review of Federal Law Issues, American Wind Energy Association, Washington, DC, 1996, 6.
21.
New Energy Co. of Indiana v. Limbach, 486 U.S. 269 (1988); Wyoming v. Oklahoma 502 U.S. 437 (1992); and Alliance for Clean Coal v. Miller 44 F.3d 591 (7th Cir. 1995).
22.
WiserR., Does it Have to be This Hard? Implementing the Nation's Most Complex Renewables Portfolio Standard, Electricity Journal, 2005, 18(8), 55–67.
23.
Engel1999; Hempling and Rader1996; FerreyS., Renewable Orphans: Adopting Legal Renewable Standards at the State Level, Electricity Journal, 2006, 19(2), 52–61.
24.
GoldenK.S., Senate Bill 1078: The Renewable Portfolio Standard-California Asserts its Leadership, Ecology Law Quarterly, 2003, 30, 693–713.
25.
HaddadB.M.JefferissP., Forging Consensus on National Renewables Policy: The Renewables Portfolio Standard and the National Public Benefits Trust Fund, Electricity Journal, 1999, 68–79.
26.
SchoofsS., A Federal Renewable Portfolio Standard: Policy Analysis and Proposal, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 2004.
27.
Ferrey2006.
28.
JaccardM., Renewable Portfolio Standard, Encyclopedia of Energy, 2004, 5, 413–421.
29.
BerryT.JaccardM., The Renewable Portfolio Standard: Design Considerations and an Implementation Survey, Energy Policy, 2001, 29, 263–277.
30.
Rader and Hempling2001.
31.
Rader2000.
32.
The Economist, Green America: Waking up and Catching up, January 25, 2007, 12–14.
33.
NogeeA., Renewable Energy and Electricity: Creating Jobs, Saving Consumers Money, and Increasing Our Energy Security, Statement before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, February 16, 2005.
34.
International Energy Agency, Variability of Wind Power and Other Renewables: Management Options and Strategies, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2005, 20.
35.
European Wind Energy Association, Large Scale Integration of Wind Energy in the European Power Supply: Analysis, Issues and Recommendations,2005, Paris, 7–9.
36.
International Energy Agency2005.
37.
International Energy Agency2005.
38.
EnerNex Corporation and the Midwest Independent System Operator. Final Report-2006 Minnesota Wind Integration Study, Knoxville, TN, November 30, 2006.
39.
American Wind Energy Association, The Renewables Portfolio Standard: How it Works and Why It's Needed, Washington, DC, October, 1997.
40.
Rader2000.
41.
Rader2000, 398–400.
42.
Rader2000, 401.
43.
American Wind Energy Association1997.
44.
EngelK.H., Harnessing the Benefits of Dynamic Federalism in Environmental Law, Emory Law Journal, 2006, 56, 159–198.
45.
NogeeA.DeyetteJ.ClemmerS., The Projected Impacts of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard, Electricity Journal, 2007, 20(4), 33–47.
46.
HathawayA., The impact of renewable/ee portfolio standard on future rate hikes in Virginia, Power-Point Presentation to the Energy Virginia Conference, Richmond, VA, October 17, 2006, 13.
47.
Hathaway2006, 14.
48.
ChenC.WiserR., and BolingerM., Weighing the costs and benefits of renewable portfolio standards: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 2007.
49.
HerigC., Using photovoltaics to preserve California's electricity capacity reserves, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2002, 2.
50.
FischerCarolyn, How can renewable portfolio standards lower electricity prices?Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, May, 2006.
51.
WiserR., Easing the natural gas crisis: Reducing natural gas prices through increased deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2005.
52.
Wiser2005, ix.
53.
SovacoolB. (2008). “Distributed Generation (DG) and the American Electric Utility System: What is Stopping It?”Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 130(1), 16–25.
54.
ClemmerS., Clean energy blueprint: A smarter national energy policy for today and the future, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC, October, 2001, 31.
55.
WiserR. & BolingerM, Balancing cost and risk: The treatment of renewable energy in western utility resource plans, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2005.
56.
SmithR., Court Decisions May Aid Some Utility Profits in Long Term, Wall Street Journal, April 3, 2007, A10.
57.
BolingerM., Accounting for fuel price risk when comparing renewable to gas-fired generation: The role of forward natural gas prices, Energy Policy, 2004, 34, 719.
58.
BarkenbusJ., Resource and Employment Impact of a Renewable Portfolio Standard in the Tennessee Valley Authority Region, Knoxville, TN, Institute for a Secure and Stable Environment at the University of Tennessee, 2006.
59.
Tennessee Valley Authority, Technical Notes on Important Air Quality Issues: The Role of Renewable Energy in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Buildup, Knoxville, TN, September, 2003.
60.
Barkenbus2006.
61.
PletkaR., Economic Impact of Renewable Energy in Pennsylvania, Black & Veatch Project 135401, March, 2004.
62.
NogeeA., Responses to Senate Questions, Union of Concerned Scientists Political Testimony, March 25, 2005.
63.
PorterK.WiserR., A Status Report on the Design and Implementation of State Renewable Portfolio Standards and System Benefits Charge Policies, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May 1, 2000.
64.
Pletka2004.
65.
BernowS.DoughertyW.BernowS.DuckworthM., Quantifying the Impacts of a National, Tradable Renewables Portfolio Standard, Electricity Journal, 1997, 42–52.
66.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, Energy Market Impacts of a Clean Energy Portfolio Standard, Washington, DC, June, 2006, v.
67.
EspeyS., Renewables Portfolio Standard: A Means for Trade With Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources?Energy Policy, 2001, 29, 557–566.
68.
GalbraithJ.K., American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, University of Chicago, 1952, 42.
