This article discusses how issue framing and nondecision-making shaped Australia's response to global climate change between 1996 and 2007. The complex and multi-dimensional nature of global climate change enabled state and non-state actors to selectively highlight certain aspects of the issue, thereby framing it as a specific problem with corresponding solutions. The case of Australia provides an interesting example of how such conscious framing, together with underlying institutional biases, may suppress important aspects of global climate change and ensure they are kept off the political agenda. This article unravels four narratives that are evident in the former Australian Government's framing of global climate change during this period. The nondecisions which are embedded within these narratives have important normative implications which will be explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Under the leadership of HowardJohn, the Coalition governed Australia from March 1996 until November 2007. Their recent electoral defeat brought the Labor Party to power under the leadership of Kevin Rudd.
2.
EntmanRobert, ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43(4) Autumn, 1993, pp51–52.
3.
Ibid, p.52.
4.
HallahanKirk, ‘Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3) 1999, p.207.
5.
ReinMartin and SchönDonald, ‘Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice’, Knowledge and Policy, 9(1) Spring 1996.
6.
Also see HajerMaarten A., The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995, pp15–17.
7.
BachrachPeter and BaratzMorton S., Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970, p.44.
8.
BachrachPeter and BaratzMorton S., ‘Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework’, American Political Science Review, 57(3) September 1963, p.641.
9.
BachrachPeter and BaratzMorton S., ‘Two Faces of Power’, The American Political Science Review, 56(4) December 1962, p.948.
10.
SchattschneiderE. E., The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1960, p.71.
11.
BachrachPeter and BaratzMorton S., Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice, pp43–44.
12.
Ibid, pp45–46.
13.
CrensonMatthew A., The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A study of non-decisionmaking in the cities, The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1971, pp177–178
14.
The term “climate change” will be used throughout to refer to global anthropogenic climate change.
15.
As early as 1979 scientists were voicing concern that the accumulation of greenhouse gases would be likely to have a dangerous warming effect, it was not until 1988 that climate change became a political issue. Newell offers a useful overview of the emergence of climate change as a political issue; see NewellPeter, Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p.52.
16.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ‘Mandate and Membership of the IPCC’, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, <http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm> at August 2006. A list of the IPCC's publications is available online, IPCC <http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/pub.htm>, at September 2006.
17.
CohenStewart, ‘Climate change and sustainable development: Towards dialogue’, p.361.
18.
Ibid, p.361.
19.
General Circulation Models (GCMs)
20.
TaylorPeter J. and ButtelFrederick H., ‘How do we Know we have Global Environmental Problems? Science and the Globalization of Environmental Discourse’, Geoforum, 23(3) 1992, pp409–410.
21.
TaylorPeter J. and ButtelFrederick H., ‘How do we Know we have Global Environmental Problems? Science and the Globalization of Environmental Discourse’, p.411.
22.
Ibid, p.411.
23.
Industrialised countries of the ‘North’ fall into this category.
24.
Developing countries of the ‘South’ fall into this category.
25.
KulkarniJyoti S., ‘A Southern Critique of the Globalist Assumptions About Technology Transfer in Climate Change Treaty Negotiations’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(4) August 2003, p.256.
26.
TaylorPeter J. and ButtelFrederick H., ‘How do we Know we have Global Environmental Problems?, p.411.
27.
Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) for a Framework Convention on Climate Change.
28.
KellowAynsley, ‘The political economy of FCCC: Who wins? Who loses?’ Paper presented at ‘Countdown to Kyoto’: The Consequences of the Mandatory Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reductions, Australian APEC Study Centre, Canberra, 19–21 August 1997, <http://www.apec.org.au/docs/kellow.pdf>, at April 2007, p.5.
29.
Ibid, p.6.
30.
LohmannLarry, ‘Marketing and Making Carbon Dumps: Commodification, Calculation and Counterfactuals in Climate Change Mitigation’, Science as Culture, 14(3), September 2005, p.205.
31.
AgarwalAnilNarainSunita, and SharmaAnju (eds), Green Politics, Global Environmental Negotiations, Vol.1, New Delhi, 1999, pp56–57.
32.
United NationsFramework Convention on Climate Change.
33.
HatchMichael T., ‘The Politics of Global Warming in Germany’, Environmental Politics, 4(3) Autumn 1995, pp415–416 and 420–421.
34.
TirkkonenJ.TapioP., and WileniusM., ‘The development of climate discourse: Internationally, in Finland and in Finnish transport futures studies’. In KäyhköJ. and TalveL. (eds.) Understanding the global system: The Finnish perspective. FIGARE, Turku, 2002, pp193–199. Available online at: <http://www.sci.utu.fi/projects/maantiede/figare/UGS/UGS-193.pdf>, at April 2007.
35.
I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer of Energy & Environment for drawing my attention to the work of Michael Hatch.
36.
HovdenEivind and LindsethGard, ‘Discourses in Norwegian Climate Policy: National Action or Thinking Globally?’, Political Studies, 52(1) March 2004, p.64.
37.
Please note that this study is part of my doctoral research for which a large number of documents have been analysed. Due to the present space restrictions, only a small selection of the documents analysed will be cited here. These citations should therefore be considered examples only.
38.
Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 20 November 1997, 10921 (John Howard, Prime Minister) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at August 2006. Also see, Australia, Securing Australia's Energy Future, and Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2004, <http://www.dpmc.gov.au/publications/energy_future/docs/energy.pdf>, at August 2006.
39.
See, for example, Australia, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 22 September 1997, 6583 (Robert Hill, Minister for Environment) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at August 2006.
40.
Bureau of Industry Economics, Greenhouse Gas Abatement and Burden Sharing – An Analysis of Efficiency and Equity Issues for Australia, Research Report No. 66, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1995, p.21.
41.
Ibid, p.91.
42.
WyckoffAndrew W. and RoopJoseph M., ‘The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products’, Energy Policy, 22(3) March 1994, pp187–188.
43.
According to a 2002 Senate Committee report, Australia's per capita transport emissions were the third highest in the world, following the US and Canada. See, Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee, The Heat is On: Australia's Greenhouse Future, Report of the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee, 2002, <http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/Committee/ecita_ctte/completed_inquiries/1999-02/gobalwarm/report/contents.htm>, p.xxxvii, at August 2006.
44.
HamiltonClive, ‘Common Misconceptions in the Climate Change Debate’, Background Paper No. 20, Submission to Senate Environment References Committee Inquiry into Australia's Response to Global Warming, November 1999, The Australia Institute, <www.tai.org.au>, pp5–6.
45.
HamiltonClive, Running from the Storm: The development of climate change policy in Australia, UNSW Press, Sydney, 2001, p.18.
46.
HamiltonClive, Running from the Storm: The development of climate change policy in Australia, p.57.
For the most recent statement, see, CampbellIan Sen., ‘Greenhouse Accounts show Australia is still on target for 108 per cent’, Media Release, 23 May 2006, Minister for Environment and Heritage, <http://www.deh.gov.au/minister/env/2006/mr23may406.html>, at October 2006.
50.
Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 29 November 2005, 28, (Greg Hunt, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage), <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at October 2006.
51.
Securing Australia's Energy Future, p.24.
52.
KayPaul, ‘Terms and Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol’, Current Issues Brief 10: 1997–98, Science, Technology, Environment and Resources Group, 9 March 1998, Parliamentary Library, <http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/CIB/1997-98/98cib10.htm>, at April 2007.
53.
United NationsFramework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto Protocol, Article 3.7, United Nations, 1998, UNFCCC, <http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf>, at October 2006. For a detailed explanation of the ‘Australia clause’ see HamiltonClive and VellenLins, ‘Land-use change in Australia and the Kyoto Protocol’, Environmental Science & Policy, 2(2) May 1999, pp145–152.
54.
KayPaul, ‘Terms and Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol’.
55.
Ibid.
56.
MacintoshAndrew, ‘The National Greenhouse Accounts and Land Clearing: Do the numbers stack up?’The Australia Institute, Research Paper No. 38, January 2007, <http://www.tai.org.au/documents/downloads/WP93.pdf>, at April 2007, p.1.
MacintoshAndrew, ‘The National Greenhouse Accounts and Land Clearing: Do the numbers stack up?’ pp1–3.
59.
Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 29 November 2005, 28, (Greg Hunt, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage).
60.
HowardJohn, ‘Transcript of the Prime Minister’, Press Conference, Parliament House, Canberra, 11 December 1997, Prime Minister John Howard, <http://www.pm.gov.au/media/interview/1997/kyoto.cfm>, at August 2006.
See, for example, Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 23 October 1997, 9699 (Alexander Downer, Minister for Foreign Affairs) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at August 2006.
63.
See, for example, Australia, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 30 November 2005, 102, (Santo Santoro, Senator) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at August 2006.
Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 2 October 1997, 9097, (John Howard, Prime Minister) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at October 2006.
66.
For emissions data see Securing Australia's Energy Future, p.24.
See, for example, MacfarlaneIan, ‘Australian Projects Ready to Roll Under New Climate Pact’, Media Release, 29 July 2005, Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources, <http://minister.industry.gov.au> at August 2006.
Australia, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 17 August 2006, 83, (Ian Campbell, Minister for Environment and Heritage) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at October 2006.
71.
Australia, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 12 September 2006, 30, (Ian Campbell, Minister for Environment and Heritage) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at October 2006.
DiesendorfMark, ‘Is ‘Clean Coal’ an Oxymoron?’. Paper presented at the In Search Of Sustainability online conference, February – November 2003, In Search Of Sustainability online conference, <http://www.isosconference.org.au/papers/Diesendorf.pdf>, at August 2006.
74.
See, for example, Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 17 August 2006, 144 (Gregory Hunt, MP Flinders) <http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au> at August 2006.
75.
TrainerTed, Towards a Sustainable Economy: The need for fundamental change, Environbook, Sydney, 1996, p.6. See, also, SmithJoseph WayneLyonsGraham, and Sauer-ThompsonGary, The Bankruptcy of Economics: Ecology, Economics and the Sustainability of the Earth, Macmillan Press Ltd.London, 1999.
76.
DouthwaiteRichard, The Growth Illusion: How economic growth has enriched the few, impoverished the many and endangered the planet, Revised edition, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island B.C.1999, pp9–10.
77.
FosterJohn Bellamy, ‘Capitalism's Environmental Crisis – Is Technology the Answer?’Monthly Review, 52(7) December 2000, p.3.
Figures according to SmilVaclav, ‘Energy Consumption in Affluent Countries’, paper presented at International Conference on Science and Technology for Sustainability, Tokyo, 16–19 December 2003, Science Council of Japan, <http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/syusai/ess2003/> at August 2006.
80.
Friends of the Earth International, ‘Climate debt: Making historical responsibility part of the solution’, December 2005, Friends of the Earth International, <http://www.foei.org/publications/pdfs/climatedebt.pdf>, at August 2006, p.5.
81.
For a complete list of the coalition members and the Climate Justice principles see International Climate Justice Network, ‘Bali Principles of Climate Justice’, August 2002, India Resource Centre, <http://www.indiaresource.org/issues/energycc/2003/baliprinciples.html> at October 2006.
Friends of the Earth International, ‘Climate debt: Making historical responsibility part of the solution’, p.2.
84.
McLarenDuncan, ‘Environmental Space, Equity and the Ecological Debt’, in AgyemanJulianBullardRobert D, and EvansBob (eds) Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004, p.22.
85.
JacksonTim and MichaelisLaurie, ‘Policies for Sustainable Consumption: A report to the Sustainable Development Commission’, 2003, Sustainable Development Commission, <http://www.sd-commission.org.uk> at August 2006, p.17.
86.
HobsonKersty, ‘Consumption, Environmental Sustainability and Human Geography in Australia: A Missing Research Agenda?’, Australian Geographical Studies, 41(2) July 2003, p.149.
