The Indian government needs to increase the access to electricity of a growing population and economy taking into account major environmental and health related challenges, rapidly changing technologies, social and cultural preferences and international commitments. Such an increased access calls for substantial investment, and hence India has been gradually liberalising the electricity sector since 1991. This paper addresses the question: What are the opportunities for accessing the foreign funding available to India and how can it use this funding to modernise its electricity sector in a sustainable manner? Based on a two year research programme, this paper examines the international institutional context and draws conclusions regarding the different mechanisms for India and the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing India. It argues that since foreign funding is flowing into the country with enhanced liberalisation, the climate change mechanisms should be used to steer electricity generation in a sustainable direction, and aid funds should be used to focus on access for the rural poor to energy.
GuptaJ.VlasblomJ., and KroezeC., eds., with contributions from BlokK.HisschemollerM.BoudriC. and DorlandK.An Asian Dilemma: Modernising the electricity sector in China and India in the context of rapid economic growth and the concern for climate change. NOP report no. 410200097, NOP, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2001.
2.
IDGEC (Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change), Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: science plan, International Human Dimensions Programme Report no. 9, IHDP, Bonn, 1999.
3.
Government of India, Opportunities & Policy Challenges for Investment in India, Background Paper, OECD India Investment Roundtable, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India, New Delhi, 2004.
4.
PerkinsR., Electricity sector restructuring in India: An environmentally beneficial policy?, Energy Policy, 2005, 33(4), 439–449.
5.
IEA, Electricity in India. Providing power to the millions, International Energy Agency/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 2002.
6.
ThakurT.DeshmukhS.G.KaushikS.C. and KulshresthaM., Impact assessment of the Electricity Act 2003 on the Indian power sector, Energy Policy, 2005, 33(9), 1187–1198.
7.
Economist Intelligence Unit (2005India Forecast. Energy Forecast World. December 2005, pp. 173–181.
FayJ.A. and GolombD.S.Energy and the Environment, New York, United States, Oxford University Press, 2002.
10.
JoyceM.J. and PortS.N.Environmental Impact of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, in: HesterR.E.HarrisonR.M., eds., Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, Royal Society of Chemistry, Letchworth, United Kingdom, 1999.
11.
World Commission on Dams, Dams and Development: A new framework for decision-making, The Report of the World Commission on Dams, Earthscan Publishing, London, 2000.
CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro, 5 June 1992.
21.
UNCED, Rio Declaration and Agenda 21. Report on the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, UN doc. A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1 (Vols.1–III).
22.
BodanskyD.ChouS. and Jorge-TresoliniC., International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A survey of approaches, Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Washington D.C., 2004.
23.
Government of India, Ninth session of the Indo-Mauritian joint commission, 8 January 2004, Press release, 8 January, 2004, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi, 2004.
AhujaD., An Indian National GEF strategy. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2003, 7(2), 30–39.
26.
Interviews (2005). Manuscript of stakeholder interviews, available with authors.
27.
FransD.R.MatinN.ReddyV.R. and UittoJ., India Hilly Hydel Local Benefits Case Study Report. Prepared for the Office of Monitoring and Evaluation of the GEF, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.
28.
GuptaJ.The Climate Change Convention and Developing Countries - From Conflict to Consensus?, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.
29.
GuptaJ.India and Climate Change Policy: Between Diplomatic Defensiveness and Industrial Transformation, Energy and Environment, 2001, 12(2&3), 217–236.
30.
ADB, GEF, and UNEP, Asia Least-cost greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy, India, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, 1998.
31.
BeuermannC.LangrockT. and OttH.E.Evaluation of (non-sink) AIJ-Projects in Developing Countries (Endadec), Wuppertal Institute, Wuppertal, Germany, 2000.
32.
KammererD.SellJ. and WeberO.Evaluation of AIJ Project Proposals – Potential to Contribute to Sustainable Development.Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2002.
BabuN. and MichaelowaA.Removing Barriers for Renewable Energy CDM Projects in India and Building Capacity at the State Level, HWWA Discussion Paper 247, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg, Germany, 2003.
35.
KreyM.Transaction costs of unilateral CDM projects in India: results from an empirical survey, Energy Policy, 2005, 33(18), 2385–2397.
36.
NagB. and ParikhJ.K., Carbon emission coefficient of power consumption in India: baseline determination from the demand side, Energy Policy, 2005, 33(6), 777–786.
MillockK., Technology transfers in the Clean Development Mechanism: An incentives issue, Environment and Development Economics, 2002, 7(3-4), 449–466.
39.
JacobsonA.Rural Electrification Using Photovoltaics in Ladakh, India, in: MetzB.DavidsonO.R.MartensJ.RooijenS.N.M.McGroyL.V.W., eds., Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000, 409–410.
40.
TumiwaF.ADB and Privatisation of Power Services, in: GuerreroD., ed., Focus ASIEN: A Handbook on the Asian Development Bank.Asienhaus, Essen, Germany, 2003.
41.
ADB, Country Strategy and Program Update 2005–2007: India, Asian Development Bank, Manilla, Philippines, 2004.
42.
MehtaA.Power Play.Orient Longman, New Delhi, 2000.
43.
World Bank, Country Strategy for India. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C., 2004.
44.
BardhanN. and PatwardhanP., Multinational corporations and public relations in a historically resistance host culture, Journal of Communication Management, 2004, 8(3-4), 246–263.
45.
HenleyJ.S., Chasing the Dragon: Accounting for the Under-Performance of India by Comparison with China in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment, Journal of International Development, 2004, 16(7), 1039–1052.
46.
GopinathC., Investing in Newly Industrialzing Economies: Managerial Lessons from the Enron Controversy, Long Range Planning, 1999, 32(3-4), 344–351.
47.
McLarneyC. and DastralaR., Socio-political structures as determinants of global success, International Journal of Social Economics, 2001, 28(4), 349–367.
48.
GuptaJ., The Global Environment Facility in its North-South Context, Environmental Politics, 1995, 4(1), 19–43.
