This paper represents a criticism of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) use of the value 0.5 K (W m−2)−1 for the climate sensitivity parameter, λ. A simple model is introduced which shows that the non-radiative effect of water vapour is a negative feedback ensuring that the Earth's surface temperature is cooler by some 17°C than if it did not participate in the energy budget.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, HoughtonJ. T., (eds.), Cambridge University Press, page 354.
2.
IdsoS. B., CO2-induced global warming: A skeptic's view of potential climate change. Climate Research10, 69, (1998).
3.
DouglassD. H. & KnoxR. S.Climate forcing by the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L05710, (2005).
4.
LindzenR. S. & GiannitsisC.On the climatic implications of volcanic cooling. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 5929, (1998).
5.
As ref. 1, Table 6.2, page 358.
6.
As ref. 1, Figure 2.1, page 107.
7.
SoonW. H.PosmentierE. S. & BaliunasS. L.Inference of solar irradiance variability from terrestrial temperature changes, 1880–1993: An astrophysical application of the sun-climate connection, The Astrophysical Journal, 472, 891, (1996).
8.
KiehlJ. T. & TrenberthK. E.Earth's annual global mean energy budget. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 78, 197, (1997).
9.
BoekerE. & van GrondelleR.Environmental Physics, John Wiley & Sons, 1995, page 34.
10.
The HITRAN spectroscopic database from the University of South Florida.
11.
Obtainable from JB: Jack1Barrett@aol.com
12.
KnoxR. S.Non-radiative energy flow in elementary climate models. Physics LettersA 329, 250, (2005).