The Current Outlook for the Nuclear Power Industry in the United States

Abstract

Serious concerns about national energy security and the need to begin preparing for a post-petroleum world are opening a window of opportunity for a potential “nuclear renaissance” in the United States. Whether such a renaissance takes root will depend on a number of countervailing tensions. This paper briefly reviews the history of the U.S. nuclear power industry and then discusses the cross-cutting forces that will determine the future course of the industry. At the moment, the single largest impediment is the failure to resolve the long term high level waste disposal issue. Other significant impediments include local NIMBYism, fear of nuclear terrorism, and financial community skepticism. Weighing on the opposite side of the scale are several favourable factors including improved operating and safety records, consolidation of plant ownership in more expert hands, extensive authorisation of license extensions for existing plants, and streamlining of licensing procedures for new plants. Most importantly, the recently enacted Energy Policy Act of 2005 creates significant economic incentives for new construction. As a result, a number of consortia are moving towards adding new units at existing generation sites. Whether these incremental additions eventually lead to a “nuclear renaissance” will depend on how economically they are constructed as well as other factors that will become clear only as the future unfolds.

Keywords

Energy policy act nuclear power United States of America

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Castellano

(2004). The Economic Future of Nuclear Power, Chicago, University of Chicago, August.

Center for Strategic and International Studies, (1999). The Regulatory Process for Nuclear Power Reactors: A Review, Washington, D.C.: Center for Staregic and International Studies.

Domenici

P.V.

(2004). A Brighter Tomorrow: Fulfilling the Promise of Nuclear Energy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc.

Grunder

H.A.

(2003). Nuclear Energy: Power for the Twenty-first Century, Argonne National Laboratory report no. ANL-03/12, Sandia National Laboratory report no. SAND3002-1545P, May. Online: www.nuclear.inel.gov/papers-presentations/power_for_the21ts_century.pdf.

Heaberlin

S.W.

(2004). A Case for Nuclear-Generated Electricity. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.

Jurewitz

J.L.

(2002). The U.S. Nuclear Power Industry: Past, Present, and Possible Futures, Energy and Environment, 13(2), 207–237.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2003). The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study, MIT. Online: www.web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/.

National Academy of Sciences Board on Radioactive Waste Management, (2001). Disposition of High Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Portney

P.R.

(2005). Nuclear Power: Clean, Costly, and Controversial, Resources, vol. 156, Resources For the Future, Washington, D.C.

10.

U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Group, (2002). Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Executive Summary, DOD GIF-001–00. 23^rd September.

11.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology, (2003). Report to Congress on Advanced Fuel Cell Cycle Initiative: The Future Path for Advanced Spent Fuel Treatment and Transmutation Research, January. Online: www.ne.doe.gov/reports/AFCI_CongRpt2003.pdf.

12.

U.S. Department of Energy/Nuclear Power Industry, (2004). Strategic Plan for Light Water Reactor Research and Development, February.

13.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, (2001). A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010, 31^st October.