CastlesIHendersonD. (2003b) ‘Economics, Emissions Scenarios and the Work of the IPCC Energy & Environment, 14 (4): 415–435.
3.
GrublerA.NakecenovicN. (2001) ‘Identifying dangers in an uncertain climate’Nature, Vol 412, July.
4.
GrublerA, 2004. ‘Emissions Scenarios: A Final Response.’Energy & Environment, 15 (1): 11–24.
5.
IPCC (2000), Emissions Scenarios, Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Nebojsa NakicenovicRob Swart (eds.), Cambridge University Press, UK.
MalakoffD (1999) ‘Bayes offers a new way to make sense of numbers’Science, vol 286, 19 Nov.
8.
ManneA.RichelsR. (2003) “Market Exchange Rates or Purchasing Power Parity: Do They Make a Difference to the Climate Debate? AEI-Brookings Joint Centre for Regulatory Studies Working Paper 03—11.
9.
McKibbinW.PearceD.StegmanA. (2004) “Long Run Projections for Climate Change Scenarios” Lowy Institute for International Policy Working paper 1.04; paper presented at the Energy Modelling Forum Workshop on “Purchasing Power parity versus Market Exchange Rates, Stanford University February. Available at http://www.lowyinstitute.org/Publication.asp?pid=129.
10.
McKibbinW.WilcoxenP. (1998) “The Theoretical and Empirical Structure of the G-Cubed Model”Economic Modelling, 16, 1, pp 123–148 (ISSN 0264—9993).
11.
McKibbinW.WilcoxenP. (2002a), Climate Change Policy After Kyoto: A Blueprint for a Realistic Approach, Washington: The Brookings Institution.
12.
MorganM.HenrionM (1990) Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, New York, Cambridge University Press.