Geological and ocean sequestration of carbon dioxide is a potential climate change mitigation option that is currently receiving an increasing level of attention within business, academic and policy communities. This paper presents a preliminary investigation of possible public reaction to the technologies under consideration. Using a focus group approach, we consider the similarities between carbon storage technologies and analogous technologies that have generated strong reactions with the public. Initial results suggest that, in principle, carbon capture and storage may be seen as an acceptable approach as a bridging policy while other options are developed. However, concerns were raised regarding the safety of storage and trust in the ability of the various institutions to oversee the process in the long term. This analysis forms part of an on-going study which will continue to investigate the perceptions of a range of stakeholders.
BurgessJ.LimbM. & HarrisonC. (1998), “Exploring Environmental Values through the Medium of Small Groups 1: Theory and Practice”, Environment & Planning A, 20: Pp. 309–326.
ChapmanG. (1997), Environment and the Media: The North-South Divide, Routledge, London.
5.
CNN, (1999), “Ocean Studied for Carbon dioxide Storage”, 10 May 1999
6.
FujiokaY.OzakiM.TakeuchiK.ShindoY. and HerzogH., 1997, “Cost Comparison in Various CO2 Ocean Disposal Options”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 38, Suppl. pp. 273–277
7.
GamsonW. & ModiglianiA. (1990), “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructivist Approach”, American Journal of Sociology, 95.
8.
GlantzM. (1995), ‘Forecasting by Analogy’, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado
9.
GreenbaunT. (1998), The Handbook for Focus Group Reseach, Sage, London.
10.
GrimstonM.C.KarakoussisV.FouquetR.van der VorstR.PearsonP. and LeachM. (2001), “The European and global potential of carbon dioxide sequestration in tackling climate change”, Climate Policy, (1), pp. 155–171
11.
Grove-WhiteR. (1996), “Brent Spar re-wrote the rules”, New Statesman, June 20th, 1996.
12.
HarrisonC.BurgessJ. & FiliusP. (1996), “Rationalising Environmental Responsibilities: A Comparison of Lay Publics in the UK and the Netherlands”, Global Environmental Change, 6: 215–234.
13.
HerzogH.AdamsE.AuerbachD. and CaulfieldJ. (1996), “Environmental Impacts of ocean disposal of CO2”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 37Nos. 6–8, pp. 999–1005
HollowayS. (Ed.) (1996) “The Underground Disposal of Carbon dioxide”, Final Report of the Joule II Project No. CT92–0031.
16.
HollowayS. (1997), “Safety of the Underground Disposal of Carbon Dioxide”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 38, Suppl. pp. S241–S245
17.
IEA (2000), “Key World Energy Statistics 2000”, IEA, Paris.
18.
IEA GHG (2000), “Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage”, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, September 2000
19.
IEA GHG (2001), “Putting Carbon back in the ground”, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham
20.
IPCC (2000), “Special Report on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry”, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21.
JohnstonP.SantilloD.StringerR.ParmentierR.HareB. and KruegerM. (1999), “Ocean Disposal/Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel Production and Use: An Overview of Rationale, Techniques and Implications”, Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Technical Note 01/99.
22.
KemptonW.BosterJ. & HartleyJ. (1995), Environmental Values in American Culture, MIT Press, Boston.
23.
KitscheltH. (1986), “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protests: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies”, British Journal of Political Science, 16.
24.
KruegerR. (1998), Focus Group Kit 3: Developing Questions for Focus Groups; Focus Group Kit 4: Moderating Focus Groups; Focus Group Kit 6: Analysing and Reporting Focus Group Results, Sage, London.
25.
LenstraW.J. and van EngelenburgB.C.W., (2000), “Climate Policy, CO2 storage and public perception”, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands.
26.
RauG. and CaldeiraK., 1999, “Enhanced carbonate dissolution: A means of sequestering waste CO2 as ocean bicarbonate”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 40, pp. 1803–1813
Social Learning Group (2001), Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Volumes 1 & 2, MIT Press, Cambridge.
29.
StevensS. H. & GaleJ. (2000), “Geological CO2 sequestration”, Oil and Gas Journal, May 15th 2000
30.
TurnerR. (1986), “Political Opposition to Nuclear Power: An Overview”, Political Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4
31.
WalshE.WarlandR. & SmithD. (1993), “Backyards, NIMBYS and Incinerator Sitings: Implications for Social Movement Theory”, Social Problems, Vol. 40, No. 1
32.
WelshI. (1993), “The NIMBY Syndrome: Its Significance in the History of the Nuclear Debate in Britain”, British Journal for the History of the Sciences, 26.
33.
WynneB. (1988), “Unruly technology: Practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding”, Social Studies of Science, 18: Pp. 147–167
