AyresR.U.1987: The Industry-Technology Life Cycle: An Integrating
Meta-Model? RR-87-3, International Institute for
Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg,
Austria.
2.
BerkhoutF.1998: “The International Civilian Reprocessing
Business”University of Sussex, Science Policy Research
Unit. Brighton, United
Kingdom.
3.
BrockerH.1996: “Maintenance Costs: Preussen Elektra and
Sydkraft compared”. Nuclear Engineering
International, July 1996, pp.
30–31.
4.
BroeckerB.
and HanssonA.A.1995: “Comparative Analysis of Maintenance Costs of
PreussenElektra or Sydkraft Nuclear Power Plants,”Autumn Meeting of Deutsches Atomforum e.V. (DatF): Improvement of
Nuclear Energy Efficiency through the Optimisation of Service and
Maintenance, Königswinter,
Germany.
5.
BürkleW.1998: Reactor Refurbishment and the Development of Improved
Designs. Twenty-Third Annual Symposium, 10–11 September 1998.
Uranium Institute, London,
United Kingdom
6.
DavisG.A.1998: “Assuring the Competitiveness of New Nuclear Plants
in a Deregulated U.S. Market”, Paris,
France.
7.
DuttunJ.M.
and ThomasA.1984: “Treating progress functions as a managerial
opportunity,”Academy of Management Review9: 235–247.
8.
EIA (Energy Information
Agency)2000: International Energy Outlook 2000 with Projections to
2020, Report DOE/EIA-0484(2000), US
EIA, Washington DC,
USA.
9.
ForsbergC.W.
and ReichW.J.1991: “Worldwide Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors with
Passive and Inherent Safety: What, Why, How and Who” Report
ORNL/TM-11907777, Oak Ridge National Lab,
Tennessee, USA.
10.
HewlettJ.G.1996: “Economic and Regulatory Factors Affecting the
Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants,”The Energy Journal, Volume 17, Number
4.
11.
HibbsM.1997: “German O&M Costs Three Times Higher than
EdF's, VDEW Says,”Nucleonics Week, vol. 38, no.
31, 31 July 1997, pp. 1. The original
study by the Cologne Institute of Energy Economics is summarised by the authors
in: HensingI.NoldenA.RiechmannC.
and SchulzW.,
“Analyse der Strompreisunterschiede zwischen Frankreich und
Deutschland,”Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, no. 4, 1997,
pp. 269–294.
12.
HughesT.P.1980: “Technological History and Technical
Problems”. In StarrC.
and RitterbushP.C.,
eds., Science Technology and the Human Prospect.
Pergamon Press, New York,
USA.
13.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy
Agency)1997: Terms for Describing New, Advanced Nuclear Power
Plants. IAEA-TECDOC-396, IAEA,
Vienna, Austria.
14.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy
Agency)1999a: “Strategies for Competitive Nuclear Power
Plants” IAEA-TECDOC-1123, International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna,
Austria.
15.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy
Agency)1999b: Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power
Plants (INSAG-12), 75-INSAG-3 Rev.1,
IAEA, Vienna,
Austria.
16.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy
Agency)2000: Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for
the Period up to 2020, Reference Data Series No. 1 (2000
Edition), IAEA,
Vienna, Austria.
17.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy
Agency)2001: Nuclear Power Reactors in the
World, Power Reactor Information System
(PRIS), Reference Data Series No. 2 (2001
Edition), IAEA,
Vienna, Austria.
18.
IEA (International Energy
Agency), 2000: World Energy Outlook
2000. International Energy Agency of the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OCED/IEA), Paris,
France.
19.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change)1996: Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and
Mitigation. In: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation
of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working
Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. [WatsonTRZinyoweraMC
and MossRH
(eds.)], Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK and New York,
USA.
20.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change)2000: Special Report on Emission
Scenarios. A Special Report of Working Group III of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, United Kingdom.
21.
KupitzJ.
and MourogovV.1999: The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Reactors.
Twenty-Third Annual Symposium, 10–11 September 1998. Uranium
Institute, London, United
Kingdom.
22.
McDonaldA.
and SchrattenholzerL.2001: “Learning rates for energy
technologies,”Energy Policy, 29(4-5):
255–261.
23.
NEA (Nuclear Energy Agency)2000: Reduction of Capital Costs of Nuclear Power
Plants. Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCED/NEA),
Paris, France.
24.
OECD (Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development)1998: Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: Update
1998. Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), International Energy Agency (IEA) and Nuclear Energy
Agency (NEA), Paris,
France.
25.
RognerH-H.1997: “An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon
Resources”. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ.
22:217–62
26.
RognerH-H.
and LangloisL.M.
(2000): “Moving Targets: Economic
Competitiveness of Nuclear Power”. IAEA
Bulletin, Vol. 42, No.2.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
Vienna, Austria.
27.
WEA (World Energy
Assessment)2000: World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of
Sustainability. GoldembergJ.
(ed). United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) and World Energy Council
(WEC), New York,
USA.