JI and CDM: Lessons from Pilot Project Assessment

Abstract

This paper discusses two important issues concerning the use of Joint Implementation (JI) and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the Kyoto Protocol: —

uncertainty in estimates of reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; and

—

contribution to and assessment of sustainable development.

The analysis is based on assessments of several operational projects which reduce GHG emissions in countries in transition and developing countries. The projects are concentrated in the energy sector.

When considering uncertainty in the estimates of GHG emissions reduction from JI/CDM projects, there are two main issues: construction of the baseline and accuracy of monitoring. Analysis across a range of project types led to estimates of baseline uncertainty which vary from 25% to 60%. Recommendations are made for measures to manage the uncertainty.

In terms of contribution to sustainable development, the paper reports analysis of the case study projects in this context and makes recommendations for project aspects which are positive in this respect.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Begg

Jackson

& Parkinson

(2001). Beyond Joint Implementation – Designing Flexibility into Global Climate Policy. Energy Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 17–27.

Begg

Parkinson

Mulugetta

Wilkinson

Doig

& Anderson

(2000). Initial Evaluation of Clean Development-type Projects in Developing Countries. Final Report to the UK Department for International Development. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK.

COWI, (1996). Joint Implementation of Commitments to Mitigate Climate Change. Analysis of Five Selected Energy Projects in Eastern Europe, COWI, Denmark.

Jackson

Begg

and Parkinson

S. D.

(eds.) (1999). Accounting and Accreditation of Activities Implemented Jointly: Final Report to DGXII, Contract No ENV4-CT96–0210, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford.

Jackson

Begg

, & Parkinson

(eds.) (2000). Flexibility in Climate Policy: Making the Kyoto Mechanisms Work, Earthscan, UK.

Leonard

Mintzer

and Michel

(1999). Climate Change, Capacity Building and the AIJ experience. Chapter 10 of Dixon

R.K.

(ed.), The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) Pilot: Experiences and Lessons Learned, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Parkinson

Begg

Bailey

Jackson

(2000a). Accounting for Flexibility against Counterfactual Baselines: Lessons from case studies from the Eastern European energy sector, Climate Policy, Vol. 1, no. 1.

Parkinson

Bailey

Begg

Jackson

(2000b). Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis – methodology and case study results, Chapter 8 of Jackson (2000)

UNDP (1999). Human Development Report, UNDP, New York.

10.

World Bank (1999). World Development Report 1999/2000, World Bank, Washington DC.