Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although generally supported by international experts and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), carbon (C) sequestration has long been a contentious and difficult issue in global climate negotiations. As the recent sixth Conference of the Parties (COP-6) held in The Hague in November 2000 demonstrated, the ‘sinks’ issue divides both the industrialized countries and the developing countries. To understand the background of the C sink controversy, and in order to assess the political acceptability of direct foreign investments in soil C sequestration in developing countries as an eligible climate policy measure, this paper briefly summarizes the main issues in the international policy debate on sinks. The paper finally analyzes the informal outcomes of COP-6 and attempts to predict the outcomes of the resumed COP-6 (COP-6 bis) to be held in July 2001.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chomitz

K.M.

: 2000, ‘Evaluating Carbon Offsets from Forestry and Energy Projects: How Do They Compare?’ Development Research Group. Washington DC: World Bank. (unpublished).

Economist, ‘Oh No, Kyoto’, 7 April 2001.

Falkowski

Scholes

R.J.

Boyle

Canadell

Canfield

Elser

Gruber

Hibbard

Högberg

Linder

Mackenzie

F.T.

Moore

III Pedersen

Rosenthal

Seitzinger

Smetacek

Steffen

: 2000, ‘The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a System’, Science 290, 291–296.

Fern, Sinking the Kyoto Protocol: The Links between Forests, Plantations and Carbon Sinks (Briefing Note, Fern: Moreton-in-Marsh, U.K., October 2000).

Greenpeace, ‘Should Forests and Other Land Use Change Activities Be in the CDM?’ (Greenpeace International, August 2000).

IGBP Terrestrial Carbon Working Group: 29 May 1998, ‘The Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: Implications for the Kyoto Protocol’, Science 280, 1393–1394.

‘Informal Note by the President of COP 6’, 2000.

International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), ‘Summary of the Sixth Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, 13–25 November 2000,’ Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12:163 (27 November, 2000). http://www.iisd.ca/vol12/enb12163e.html.

Letter of March 13, 2001 from President George W. Bush to Senators Hagel, Helms, Craig, and Roberts, http://www.globalclimate.org/BushLetter.htm.

10.

Missfeldt

Haites

, ‘The Potential Contribution of Sinks to Meeting the Kyoto Protocol’. Manuscript, 2001.

11.

Nabuurs

G.J.

Dolman

A.J.

Verkaik

Kuikman

P.J.

van Diepen

C.A.

Whitmore

A.P.

Daamen

W.P.

Oenema

Kabat

Mohren

G.M.J.

, ‘Article 3.3 and 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol: Consequences for industrialised countries’ commitments, the monitoring needs, and possible side effects,’ Environmental Science and Policy 3(2000), 123–134.

12.

Nature, ‘Critical Politics of Carbon Sinks’ (30 November 2000) vol. 408, no. 6812, p. 501.

13.

‘New Proposals by the President of COP 6’, 9 April 2001.

14.

http://www.unfccc.de/sessions/cop6_2/unfccc_np.pdf.

15.

New Scientist: 21 November 1998, ‘Down to Earth’, 160 (2161), 17.

16.

Noble

I. R.

Scholes

R. J.

, ‘Review: Sinks and the Kyoto Protocol,’ Climate Policy 1 (2001), pp. 5–25.

17.

‘Note by the President of COP-6. 23 November 2000’. http://www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop6/dec1-cp6.pdf.

18.

Ringius

, Soil Carbon Sequestration and the CDM: Opportunities and Challenges for Africa. CICERO Report 1999–07. CICERO, Oslo, Norway.

19.

Ringius

, Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000).

20.

‘Technical Talks on Climate Change’ (December 12, 2000). Document prepared for a meeting of a group of officials from the Umbrella Group and the European Union held in Ottawa on December 6 and 7, 2000.

21.

Watson

R. T.

Noble

I. R.

Bolin

Ravindranath

N.H.

Verardo

D.J.

Dokken

D.J.

(eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

What Prospects for Soil Carbon Sequestration in the CDM? Cop-6 and beyond

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References