MilliganM., and MillerA., “Value of Windpower: An Investigation Using a Qualified Production Cost Model,” Windpower '93 Proceedings; July 12–16, 1993; San Francisco, California. American Wind Energy Association: Washington, DC, 1993; 74–81.
2.
MilliganM., “Modeling Utility-Scale Wind Power Plants, Part 1: Economics,”Wind Energy, 1999; Vol. 2, 167–193, John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom.
3.
MilliganM.MillerA., and ChapmanF., “Estimating the Economic Value of Wind Forecasting to Utilities.” Windpower '95 Proceedings; March 27–31, 1995; American Wind Energy Association: Washington, DC, 1995.
4.
WanY., “An Analysis of Current Utility Practice of Rating and Reporting Wind Generating Capacity.” Working paper. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 1997.
5.
Panel session: Maintaining Reliability in a Competitive Environment, Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems 5th International Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, September 1997.
6.
MilliganM., and ParsonsB., “A Comparison and Case Study of Capacity Credit Algorithms for Wind Power Plants,”Wind Engineeringvol. 23No. 3, 1999, 159–166. Multi-Science Publishing Co. LTD., Essex, United Kingdom.
7.
MarnayC., and StraussT., Variance Reduction in Monte Carlo Chronological Production-cost Modelling.Sacramento, California: California Public Utilities Commission, 1990.
8.
MilliganM., “Variance Estimates of Wind Plant Capacity Credit.” WindPower '96 Proceedings; June 23–27, 1996; Denver, Colorado. NREL/TP-440-21311. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1996.
9.
BillintonR. and ChenH., and GhajarR., “A Sequential Simulation Technique for Adequacy Evaluation of Generating Systems Including Wind Energy.” IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, January 12–15, 1996. Baltimore, Maryland.
10.
MilliganM., “Wind Plant Capacity Credit Variations: A Comparison of Results Using Multiyear Actual and Simulated Wind-Speed Data.” Windpower '97 Proceedings; June 15–18, 1997; Austin, Texas. NREL/CP-440-23096. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 1997.
11.
MilliganM. and GrahamM., “An Enumerated Technique for Modelling Wind Power Variations in Production Costing.” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems; September 21–25, 1997; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. NREL/TP-440-22868. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
12.
KahnE.“The Reliability of Distributed Wind Generators,”Electric Power Systems Research.Vol 2. 1979. Elsevier Sequoia. Lausanne.
13.
GrubbM., “The Integration of Renewable Electricity Sources,”Energy Policy, September, 1991. 670–688.
14.
MilliganM., and ArtigR., “Optimal Site Selection and Sizing of Distributed Utility-Scale Wind Power Plants.” Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference of the International Association for Energy Economics; May 13–16, 1998; Quebec City, Canada: International Association for Energy Economics: Cleveland, Ohio, USA; 313–322.
15.
ErnstB., Analysis of Wind Power Ancillary Services Characteristics with German 250-MW Wind Data.1999. NREL/TP-500-26969. Golden, CO, USA. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
16.
MilliganM., and FactorT., “Application of a Dynamic Fuzzy Search Algorithm to Determine Optimal Wind Plant Sizes and Locations in Iowa.” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems; September 25–28, 2000; to appear. Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.
17.
The Iowa sites are: Alta (Alt), Algona (Alg), Arlington (Arl), Cedar (Ced), Estherville (Est), Forest City (For), Inwood (Inw), Radcliffe (Rad), Red Oak (Red), Sibley (Sib), Sutherland (Sut), and Turin (Tur).
18.
SweetW., “Restructuring the Thin-stretched Grid.”Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)Spectrum, June, 2000; 43–49.