Observed trends in global surface air temperature depart significantly from those predicted by the ensemble of models used in the Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. An alternative paradigm, where lower rates of warming are predicted, has emerged in the last three years. Here we test the hypotheses put forth by those models and document the alternative that is likely more consistent with observations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrinM., Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity based on a simple climate model fitted to observations of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content, Environmetrics, 2012, doi: 10.1002/env.2140.
2.
AnnanJ.D., and HargreavesJ.C., On the generation and interpretation of probabilistic estimates of climate sensitivity, 2011, Climatic Change, 104, 324–436.
3.
DouglassD. H., A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model predictions. International Journal of Climatology, 2007, doi: 10.1.1002/JOC.1651
4.
HargreavesJ.C., Can the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate sensitivity?Geophysical Research Letters, 2012, 39, L24702, doi: 10.1029/2012GL053872
5.
LewisN., An objective Bayesian, improved approach for applying optimal fingerprint techniques to estimate climate sensitivity. Journal of Climate, 2013, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00473.1.
6.
LindzenR.S., and ChoiY-S., On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Science, 2011, 47, 377–390.
7.
LoehleC., A minimal model for estimating climate sensitivity. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 276, 80–84.
8.
MastersT., Observational estimates of climate sensitivity from changes in the rate of ocean heat uptake and comparison to CMIP5 models. Climate Dynamics, 2013, doi:101007/s00382-013-1770-4.
9.
MoriceC. P., Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 dataset, J. Geophys. Res., 2012, 117, D08101, doi:10.1029/2011JD017187.
10.
OttoA., Energy budget constraints on climate response. Nature Geoscience, 2013, 6, 415–416
PopperK., 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge, New York. 562 pp.
13.
RingM.J., Causes of the global warming observed since the 19th century. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 2012, 2, 401–415.
14.
SchmittnerA.Climate sensitivity estimated from temperature reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum. Science, 2011, 334, 1385–1388.
15.
SpencerR. W., and BraswellW. D., The role of ENSO in global ocean temperature changes during 1955–2011 simulated with a 1D climate model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2013, doi:10.1007/s13143-014-0011-z
16.
KuhnT.S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, 172pp.
17.
van HaterenJ.H., A fractal climate response function can simulate global average temperature trends of the modern era and the past millennium. Climate Dynamics, 2012, doi: 101007/s00382-012-1375-3.
