In this work contemporary climate ideas are analyzed in the light of the Scientific Method developed through the ages. The conclusion is that science was not used in this subject.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckE. G., “180 Years of atmospheric CO2 Gas Analysis by Chemical Methods”, Energy & Env. 18, 259 (2007). Real Climate: “Beck to the future” (visited November 2012).
2.
CarterR. M., “Climate: The counter consensus”, Stacey International Publishers (2010). ISBN 978-1-906768-29-4.
HardinG., “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science162, 1243 (1968).
9.
IPCC2001, IPCC Third Assessment Report “Climate 2001: The Scientific Basis” (report of Working Group I of the IPCC, chaired by HoughtonJ. T. and DingY..
Editorial in Nature477, 131 (2011). doi:10.1038/477131b
12.
OrzelC., “What's a Photon, and How Do We Know they Exist?” at ScienceBlogs.com (2010), Posted on August 5, 2010.
13.
StottP. A.PetersonT. C.HerringS., “Explaining Extreme Events of 2011 From a Climate Perspective”, Am. Meteo. Soc. July 2012, 1041 (2012), edited by PetersonT. C.StottP. A. and HerringS.. DOI:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00021.1
14.
PopperKarl, “The Logic of Scientific Discovery”, Routledge (2002), ISBN 978-0415278447.
15.
RevelleR., “Carbon Dioxide and World Climate”, Sci. Am.247, 35 (1982).
16.
StallingaP., “De Mythe van Klimaatsveranderingen” (Dutch; “The Myth of Climate Changes”), Lulu (2010). ISBN 978-1-4461-3493-1.
17.
TalebNassim Nicholas, “The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable”. Allen Lane (2011). ISBN 978-1846145650.
