Based on the monthly micro-level data of Beijing urban households from 2002 to 2009, we estimate the price and income elasticities of residential electricity demand among income groups with both the almost-ideal-demand-system (AIDS) and the linear double-logarithmic (LDL) model specifications. The estimated price elasticity is close to unit elasticity and increases as income grows, and income elasticity is low and positive and approximates to zero as income increases. Thus, we conclude that it might be effective by using pricing policies for demand-side management to adjust the electricity consumption of high-income groups, while increasing price will severely hit low-income groups. In addition, low-income groups will consume more electricity if their income increases. This suggests that while tariff reform is necessary, supporting policies are needed. In this regard, either directly subsidizing low-income families or rationally setting the price levels of different tariff blocks can be helpful.
ZhuC., Suggestions and Blueprint of China's Multi-step Electricity Pricing System. Sino-Global Energy, 2010(5), 13–17.
9.
LiuS. and YangJ., Research on Increasing Block Electricity Tariffs. Price: Theory & Practice, 2010(3), 12–14.
10.
ZhangL., Discussion on Increasing Block Electricity Tariffs in China. Price: Theory & Practice, 2010(2), 9–10.
11.
LinB., Controversy over the Increasing Block Electricity Tariffs. China Power Enterprise Management, 2010(27), 20–22.
12.
LiZ., Ten Issues on Increasing Block Electricity Tariffs. Environmental Economy, 2012(8), 27–35.
13.
LiuS. and YangJ., Interpretation of Increasing Block Electricity Tariffs Based on Policy Objectives and Theory. China Power Enterprise Management, 2010(27), 12–13.
14.
LinB. and JiangZ., Designation and Influence of Household Increasing Block Electricity Tariffs in China. Energy Policy, 2012, 42, 164–173.
15.
LiH.DongL. and XieM., A Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation and Optimization of How Removing Gas and Electricity Subsidies Would Affect Households' Living. Economic Research Journal, 2011(2), 100–112.
16.
TaylorL. D., The demand for electricity: A survey. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1975, 74–110.
17.
JamesA. E. and MollyE., Turning on the Lights: A Meta-Analysis of Residential Electricity Demand Elasticities. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2004, 36(1), 65.
18.
Pernille, Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. 2003.
19.
FilippiniM. and PachauriS., Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households. Energy policy, 2004, 32(3), 429–436.
20.
QiF., An application of Ramsey pricing in solving the cross-subsidies in Chinese electricity tariffs. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, IEEE, Nanjing, 2008, 442–447.
21.
ShiG.ZhengX. and SongF., Estimating elasticity for residential electricity demand in china. TheScientificWorldJournal, 2012, 2012, 395–629.
22.
MadlenerR., Econometric analysis of residential energy demand. Journal of Energy Literature, 1996, 2, 3–32.
23.
XiaoN.ZarnikauJ. and DamienP., Testing functional forms in energy modeling: An application of the Bayesian approach to US electricity demand. Energy Economics, 2007, 29(2), 158–166.
24.
DeatonA. and MuellbauerJ., An almost ideal demand system. The American Economic Review, 1980, 70(3), 312–326.
25.
BanksJ.BlundellR. and LewbelA., Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997, 79(4), 527–539.
26.
SwansonT. and GroomB., Urban Water Pricing in Beijing: Efficiency and Distributional Implications, University College London, London, 2004.
27.
FilippiniM., Swiss residential demand for electricity by time-of-use: An application of the almost ideal demand system. The Energy Journal, 1995, 27–39.
28.
FilippiniM., Electricity demand by time of use An application of the household AIDS model. Energy Economics, 1995, 17(3), 197–204.
29.
YueP., Research of Efficiency and Equity in Urban Residential Water Pricing Policy: A Case Study in Beijing, Master, Peking University, 2008.
30.
PashardesP.KoundouriP. and HajispyrouS., Household demand and welfare implications for water pricing in Cyprus, 2001.
31.
ZhangS. and GroomB., Income Related Welfare Impacts of Water Pricing in Beijing, Peking University, University College London, Beijing, 2005.
32.
DengL., Pricing Policies in Water Demand Management, Master, Peking University, 2006.
33.
MaX.ZhangS. and XieX., Elasticity for Urban Residential Water Demand: A Case Study in Beijing. China Price, 2011(3), 62–66.
34.
MaX.ZhangS. and MuQ., Application of Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System in Analysis of Demand Elasticity of Household Water Demand of Beijing. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2012, 48(3), 483–490.
35.
OguraM., Testing for structural break in Japanese demand system after the bubble era. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2011, 22(3), 277–286.
36.
Bureau of Energy, Ministy of Economic Affairs, Household Energy Savings Manual, Taiwan, 2006.
VerbeekM. and NijmanT., Testing for Selectivity Bias in Panel Data Models. International Economic Review, 1992, 33(3), 681–703.
39.
NijmanT. and VerbeekM., Nonresponse in Panel Data: The Impact on Estimates of a Life Cycle Consumption Function. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1992, 7(3), 243–257.
40.
BaltagiB. H. and SongS. H., Unbalanced panel data: A survey. Statistical Papers, 2006, 47(4), 493–523.
41.
BMBS, Statistical Reporting System of the Urban Households, Beijing Municipal Statistics Bureau, Beijing, 2006.
42.
BMBS, Beijing Statistical Yearbook, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2003.
43.
XuX., Residential Housing Rent Accounting and the Impact on Consumption Rate: International Comparison and Empirical Study in China. China Opening Journal, 2012(2).
44.
AndersonK. P., Residential Demand for Electricity: Econometric Estimates for California and the United States. The Journal of Business, 1973, 46(4), 526–553.
