Border Tax Adjustments (BTAs) resurfaced recently in national policy debates as a possible measure to counter the anti-competitiveness effect of unilateral environmental taxes. There seems to be no consensus in the literature on the effectiveness of BTAs under environmental taxes. This paper aims to provide a theoretical Heckscher-Ohlin analysis that not only challenges the effectiveness of BTAs, but also proposes an alternative approach to counter the anti-competitiveness effect of unilateral environmental taxes. Using conventional Heckscher-Ohlin methodology, in a small country, we show that policy makers should, instead of implementing BTAs, consider the opposite of BTAs to mitigate the anti-competitiveness effects of environmental taxes. We show that gains from trade, due to a reduction in import tariffs, could, under certain assumptions, offset the initial tax induced welfare loss.
Alexecva-TalebiV.LöschelA. and MennelT.2008. Competitiveness in Unilaterl Climate Policy: Border Tax Adjustments or Integrated Emissions Trading?Centre for European Economic Reseach (ZEW).
2.
BiermannF. and BrohmR.2003. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol Without the United States: The Strategic Role of Energy Ta Adjustments at the Border. Global Governance Working Paper. No.5.
3.
CharnovitzS.2003. Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies. Working Draft. Pew Centre on Global Climate Change.
4.
De CendraJ.2006. Can Emissions Trading Schemes be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis Vis-à-vis WTO LawReview of European Community and International Environmental Law. 15(2): 131–145.
5.
De KamF.2002. Discussion Paper OECD, Conference on Environmental Fiscal Reform, Berlin.
6.
DemaillyD. and QuirionP.2005. Leakage from Climate Policies and Border-Tax Adjustment: Lessons from a Geographic Model of the Cement Industry. CESifo Venice Summer Institute.
7.
DemaretP. and StewardsonR.1994. BTA Under GATT – Trade, Environment and the Future. Washington D.C.
8.
General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT).1970. Working Party Report on Border Tax Adjustments. GATT document L/3464.
9.
GohG.2004. The World Trade Organization, Kyoto and Energy Tax adjustments at the Border. Journal of World Trade. 38(3): 395–423.
10.
Government of Japan.1996. Utilization of Economic Instruments in Environmental Policies – Taxes and Charges. First Report of the Research Panel on Economic Instruments such as Taxation and Charges in Environmental Policies. Environment Agency. Government of Japan.
11.
GrosD.2009. Global Welfare Implications of Carbon Border Taxes. CEPS Working Document, No.315.
12.
GrossmanG. M.1980. BTA: Do They Distort Trade?Journal of International Economics. No.10: 117–128.
13.
HoernerJ. and MullerF.1996. Carbon Taxes for Climate Protection in a Competitive World. Centre for Global Change, University of Maryland.
14.
IsmerR. and NeuhoffK.2007. Border Tax Adjustment: A Feasible Way to Support Stringent Emission Trading. European Journal of Law and Economics. No.24:137–164.
15.
IsmerR. and NeuhoffK.2004. Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible Way to Address Nonparticipation in Emission Trading. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics CWPE 0409. CMI Working Paper 36.
16.
LockwoodB.MenzaD. and MylesG.1994. When are the Origin and Destination Regimes Equivalent?International Tax and Public Finance. 1(1):5–24.
17.
LockwoodB. and WhalleyJ.2008. Carbon Motivated Border Tax Adjustments: Old Wine in Green Bottles?NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper 14025.
18.
MathiesenL. and MaestadO.2002. Climate Policy and the Steel Industry: Achieving Global Emission Reductions by an Incomplete Climate Agreement. Discussion Papers 20/2. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen.
19.
McKibbenW. J. and WilcoxenP.2008. The Economic and Environmental Effects of Border Tax adjustments for Climate Policy. Brookings Global Economy and Development Conference. Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
20.
MeadeJ. E.1974. A Note on Border-Tax Adjustments. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(5): 1013–1015.
21.
NorregaardJ. and Reppelin-HillV.2000. Taxes and Tradable Permits as Instruments for Controlling Pollution: Theory and Practice. IMF Working Paper. WP/00/13.
22.
PugelT. A.2007. International Economics. Thirteenth Edition. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
23.
SalvatoreD.1998. International Economics. Sixth edition. Prentice Hall.
24.
StiglitzJ.2006. A New Agenda for Global Warming. Economists Voice. July 2006. www.bepress.com/ev
25.
University of Pretoria. Department of Economics and Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University (UP).2007. An Electricity-Based Environmental Tax for South Africa. Unpublished research report for the National Treasury, South Africa.
26.
Van HeerdenJ.H.BlignautJ.GerlaghR.HessS.HorridgeM.MabuguM. and MabuguR.2006. Searching for triple dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. The Energy Journal, 27(2):113–141.
27.
VeenendaalP. and MandersT.2008. Border Tax Adjustment and the EU-ETS, a Quantitative Assessment. CPB Document No.171. Central Planning Bureau, The Hague.
28.
WhalleyJ.1979. Uniform Domestic Tax Rates, Trade Distortions and Economic Integration. Journal of Public Eonomics. 11(2): 213–221.
29.
WhalleyJ.2009. On the Effectiveness of Carbon-Motivated Border Tax Adjustments. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series. No.63.
