MarchettiC., On geoengineering and the CO2 problem, Climatic Change, 1977, 1, 59–68.
2.
MeadowcroftJ.LanghelleO., Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2011.
3.
MarkussonN.ShackleyS.EvarB., The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage, London, Earthscan, 2012.
4.
de ConinckH.BäckstrandK., An international relations perspective on the global politics of carbon dioxide capture and storage’, Global Environmental Change, 2011, 21, 2, 368–378.
5.
StephensJ.LiuY., The evolving international CCS community, MarkussonN. eds., The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage, London, Earthscan, 2012.
6.
BrunstingS.Best-Waldhoberde M.FeenstraC.F.J.MikundaT., Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the Dutch CCS Case Barendrecht, Proceedings of the GHGT-10 Conference, Amsterdam2010.
7.
DütschkeE., What drives local public acceptance. Comparing two cases from Germany, Proceedings of the GHGT-10 Conference, Amsterdam, 2010.
8.
FisherF.Citizens and Experts in Risk Assessment: Technical Knowledge in Practical Deliberation, Technikfolgenabschatzung – Theorie und Praxis, 2004, 2, 13, 90–98.
9.
WynneB., May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divideLashS.SzerszynskiB.WynneB. eds., Risk, Environment and Modernity, 1996, Sage, London.
10.
ChoudharyM.Citizen's Discourses and the Logic of Policy Deliberation: A Post-positivist Evaluation of the Sardar Sarovar Project in India, PhD dissertation, 2009, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.
11.
HoppeR., Political judgement and the policy cycle: The case of ethnicity policy arguments in the Netherlands, FischerF.ForesterJ. eds., The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, 1993, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.
12.
WynneB., Rationality and Ritual: Participation and Exclusion in Nuclear Decision-Making, 2010, LondonEarthscan.
13.
CambrosioALimogesC, Controversies as governing processes in technology assessments,’Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1991, 3, 377–396.
14.
HoppeR.GrinJ., Traffic problems go through the technology assessment machine: A culturalist comparison, VigN.PaschenH. eds., Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, 2002, Albany, NY, SUNY Press.
15.
MathurN., Urban Revitalisation as Participatory Planning: A Discursive Analysis of Policy Deliberation in Newark, PhD dissertation, 2003, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.
16.
MabonL.VercelliS.ShackleyS.AnderlucciJ.BootK., Carbon Capture and Storage Public Perception Factors: Literature Review and Open Issues, ECO2 FP7 Deliverable, 2012, http://www.eco2-project.eu/.