The role of the North Atlantic Oscillation, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, volcanic and other aerosols, as well as the extraordinary solar activity of the late 20th century are discussed in the context of the warming since the mid-1970s. Much of that warming is found to be due to natural causes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HurrellJames W., “Influence of variations in extratropical wintertime teleconnections on Northern Hemisphere temperature”, Geophys. Res. Lett.23, 665–668 (1996).
2.
VisbeckMartin H.HurrellJanes W.PolvaniLorenzo, and CullenHeidi M., “The North Atlantic Oscillation: Past, present, and future”, PNAS98, 12876–12877 (2001).
3.
TrouetValérie, Persistent Positive North Atlantic Oscillation Mode Dominated the Medieval Climate Anomaly”, Science324, 78–80 (2009).
4.
That the AMOC might have influenced the NAO is based on the model study of DelworthT. L. and GreatbatchR. J., “Multidecadal Thermohaline Circulation Variability Driven by Atmospheric Surface Flux Forcing”, J. Clim.13, 1481–1495 (2000). The model-based studies of these authors show that “the multidecadal THC [thermohaline circulation] fluctuations are driven by a spatial pattern of surface heat flux variations that bears a strong resemblance to the North Atlantic oscillation.” No conclusive evidence, however, was found “that THC variability is part of a dynamically coupled mode of the atmosphere and ocean models.” One should also keep in mind that at mid-lattitudes the atmosphere carries several times more heat to the North Atlantic than the ocean. See, for example, SeagerRichard, “The Source of Europe's Mild Climate”, American Scientist94, 334–341 (2006), and references cited therein.
5.
SaigneC. and LegandM., “Measurements of methanesulphonic acid in Antarctic ice”, Nature330, 240–242 (1987).
6.
RöthlisbergerRegine and AbramNerilie“Sea-ice proxies in Antarctic ice cores”, PAGES News17, 24–26 (2009).
7.
BriffaK. R., “Low-frequency Temperature Bariations from a Northern Tree Ring Density Network”, J. Geophys. Res.106D3, 2929–2941 (2001).
8.
PintoJ. P.TurcoR. P., and ToonO. B., J. Geophys. Res.94, 11165 (1989).
