Environmental noise is a growing and well recognized health problem. However, in many cases people are exposed not to a single noise source—for example, road, railway, or aircraft noise—but to a combination of noise exposures and there is only limited knowledge of the effects on health of exposure to combined noise sources. A socio-acoustic survey among 1953 persons aged 18–75 years was conducted in residential areas exposed to railway and road traffic noise with sound levels ranging from LAeq,24h 45–72 dB in a municipality east of Gothenburg, Sweden. The objectives were to assess various adverse health effects, including annoyance, and to elucidate the impact of exposure to single and combined noise sources. In areas exposed to both railway and road traffic, the proportion annoyed by the total traffic sound environment (total annoyance) was significantly higher than in areas with one dominant noise source rail or road traffic with the same total sound exposure (LAeq,24h,tot). This interaction effect was significant from 59 dB and increased gradually with higher sound levels. Effects of the total sound exposure should be considered in risk assessments and in noise mitigation activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChampelovierP.CremeziC.CharletC.LambertJ. (2004). “Evaluation de la gêne due à l'exposition combinée aux bruits routier et ferroviaire!,” (“Evaluation of annoyance due to combined exposure to noise from road and railway traffic!”), Lyon, France, INRETS, Report No. INRETS. 242.
2.
CremeziC.GautierP. E.LambertJ.ChampelovierP. (2001). “Annoyance due to combined noise sources: Advanced results,”Proceedings ICA International Commission for Acoustics: 17th ICA - International Congress on Acoustics, Rome, Italy, Edited by AlippiA., September 2–7 (CD ROM).
3.
EU Commission (2002). “A study of European priorities and strategies for railway noise abatement,” Final Report No. 01.980, EU Commission, DirectorateGeneral for Energy and Transport, Belgium, ODS Reference No.: 00.2335.
4.
HuybregtsC. (2003). “Community response to changes in railway noise exposure—a review,”Proceedings of the 8th Western Pacific Acoustics Conference (Wespac VIII), Melbourne, Australia, 7–9 April.
5.
ISO (E). (2003). “Technical specification, acoustics – Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys,” ISO/TS15666: (E).
6.
JonassonH.NielsenH. L. (1996). Road traffic noise-Nordic prediction method, Nordic Council of Ministers, Tema Nord, Copenhagen, Denmark, Vol. 525, ISBN 92 9120 836 1.
7.
JoncourS.CailhauD.GautierP. E.ChampelovierP.LambertJ. (2000). “Annoyance due to combined noise sources,”Proceedings of the 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering, Nice, France, 27–30 August.
8.
KakuJ.YamadaI. (1996). “The possibility of a bonus for evaluating railway noise in Japan,”J. Sound Vib. 193(1), 445–450.
9.
KurraS.MorimotoM.MaekawaZ. I. (1999). “Transportation annoyance—A simulated-environment study for road, railway and aircraft noises, Part I: Overall annoyance,”J. Sound Vib. 220(2), 251–278.
10.
LambertJ.ChampelovierP.VernetI. (1998). “Assessing the railway bonus: The need to examine the “new infrastructure” effect,”Proceedings of Inter Noise1998, 16–18 November, Christchurch, New Zealand.
11.
LercherP.BrauchleG.WidmannU. (1999). “The interaction of landscape and soundscape in the Alpine area of the Tyrol: An annoyance perspective,”Proceedings of Inter Noise 1999, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 2–4 December.
12.
MiedemaH. (2004). “Relationship between exposure to multiple noise sources and annoyance,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.116(2), 949–957.
13.
MiedemaH. M. E.OudshoornC. G. M. (2001). “Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals,”Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 409–416.
14.
MiedemaH. M. E.VosH. (1998). “Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.104, 3432–3445.
15.
MoehlerU.LiepertM.SchuemerR.GriefahnB. (2000). “Differences between railway and road traffic noise,”J. Sound Vib. 231(3), 853–864.
16.
MoriharaT.YanoT.SatoT. (2002). “Comparison of dose-response relationships between railway and road traffic noises in Kyushu and Hokkaido, Japan,”Proceedings of Inter Noise 2002, Dearborn, MI, 19–20 August.
17.
NilssonM. E. (2001). “Perception of traffic sounds in combination,”Ph.D. dissertation, Archives of the Center for Sensory Research, Stockholm University and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, ISBN 91–887- 8410-X.
18.
ÖhrströmE. (1989). “Sleep disturbance, psychosocial and medical symptoms—A pilot survey among persons exposed to high levels of road traffic noise,”J. Sound Vib. 133, 117–128.
19.
ÖhrströmE.SkänbergA.-B. (1996). “A field survey on effects of exposure to noise and vibrations from railway traffic. Part I: Annoyance and activity disturbance effects,”J. Sound Vib. 193(1), 39–47.
20.
ÖhrströmE. (1997). “Community reactions to railway traffic—Effects of countermeasures against noise and vibration,”Proceedings of Inter Noise 1997, Budapest, Hungary, Vol. 2, pp. 1065–1070.
21.
ÖhrströmE. (2000). “Sleep disturbances caused by road traffic noise— Studies in laboratories and field,”Noise & Health8, 71–78.
22.
ÖhrströmE.SkänbergA. (2004). “Sleep disturbances from road traffic and ventilation noise—Laboratory and field experiments,”J. Sound Vib. 271, 279–296.
23.
ÖhrströmE.2004. “Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise—Annoyance, activity disturbances and psychosocial well being,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.115(2), 719–729.
24.
ÖhrströmE.BarregärdL.SkänbergA.SvenssonH.ÅngerheimP.HolmesM.BondeE. (2005a). “Undersökning av hälsoeffekter av buller frän vägtrafik, täg och flyg i Lerums kommun,”“Study of health effects from road traffic, railway and aircraft noise in Lerum municipality”, Report No. ISSN 1400–5808, ISRN GUMMED-R-2005/1-SE, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
25.
ÖhrströmE.SkänbergA.BarregardL.SvenssonH.AngerheimP.2005b. “Effects of simultaneous exposure to noise from road- and railway traffic,”Proceedings of Inter Noise 2005, Rio de Janeiro, 6–10 August, Paper no 1570 (CD ROM).
26.
ÖhrströmE.SkänbergA. (2006). “Litteraturstudie–Effekter avseende buller och vibrationer frän tägoch vägtrafik.” “Literature study - Effects of noise and vibrations from railway and road traffic”, Report No. 112, ISSN 1650–4321, ISBN 91-7876-111-5, Ocupational and Environmental Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
27.
ÖhrströmE.SkänbergA.SvenssonH.Gidlöf GunnarssonA.2006. “Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness,”J. Sound Vib. 295, 40–59.
28.
OtaA.YokoshimaS.KamitaniK.TamuraT. (2006). “A study on evaluation methods of combined traffic noises, Part 2: Community response to road traffic and conventional railway noises,”Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2006, Honolulu, Hawaii, 3–6 December, Paper No. 412 (CD ROM).
29.
RonnenbaumT.Schulte-FortkampB.WeberR. (1996). “Synergetic effects of noise from different sources: A literature study,”Proceedings of Inter-Noise 96, Liverpool, U.K., Edited by HillF. A.LawrenceR. July, Vol. 5, pp. 2241–2246.
30.
National Institute for Communication Analysis (SIKA) (2000). “Utveckling av godstransporter 2010,” (“Prognoses of freight transportation 2010”), Report No. 2000:7.
31.
National Institute for Communication Analysis (SIKA) (2002). “Utveckling av persontransporter, prognoser for 2010, 2020,” (“Development of passenger transport, forecast for 2010, 2020”), Report No. 2002:1.
32.
van DongenJ. E. F.van den BergR. (1983). “Gewenning aan het geluid van een nieuwe spoorlijn,” (Adapting to noise from a new railway line), IMG-TNO Report No. RL-HR-03-02, Delft, The Netherlands.
33.
VosJ. (2004). “Annoyance caused by the sounds of a magnetic levitation train,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.115(4), 1597–1608.
34.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2000). “Guidelines for community noise” Edited by BerglundB.LindvallT.SchwelaD. H.GohK.-T., Guideline Document, Geneva, Switzerland.
35.
YanoT.MurakamiY.KawaiK.SatoT. (1998). “Comparison of responses to road traffic and railway noises,”Proceedings Noise Effects ‘98–7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health’ Problem, Sydney, Australia, 22–26 November, Noise Effects ‘98’ PTY Ltd.
