ShieldB.DockrellJ., The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children, JASA123, no 1, 133–144, 2008.
2.
ShieldB.DockrellJ., Children's perception of the acoustic environment at school and at home., JASA115, no 6, 2964–2973, 2004.
3.
BuddA.ShieldB.DockrellJ., A speech intelligibility test for use with young children in realistic classroom environments, Proc. Euronoise2009, Edinburgh
4.
GreenlandE.ShieldB.DockrellJ., Control of noise for speech intelligibility in open plan classrooms, Proc. Euronoise 2009, Edinburgh.
5.
GreenlandE., Acoustics of Open Plan Classrooms in Primary Schools, Ph.D. Thesis, London South Bank University, 2008.
6.
NestorasC.DanceS., Computer model validation and the application of threshold efficient S/N room acoustics measurements, Proc. Euronoise 2009, Edinburgh.
7.
NestorasC.DanceS., Speech intelligibility measurements with low level output – Efficiency limitations, Proc. Institute of Acoustics, 28(6), 2006.
8.
NestorasC., The Assessment Of Speech Intelligibility In Room Acoustics For Efficient Application In Computer Modelling And Improved Enclosed Spaces, Ph.D. Thesis, London South Bank University, 2009.
9.
GomezL.DanceS.MuranoS., Evaluation of More Suitable Test Methodologies to Obtain RT and STI in London Underground Spaces. Inter-Noise 2008, October 2008.
10.
DanceS., Minimal input models for sound level and reverberation time prediction in enclosed spaces, Applied Acoustics, 34(9), 13–17, 2003.
11.
DanceS.GomezL.NestorasC., Are simplified models good enough to predict the acoustics of Underground Stations?Inter-Noise 2008, October 2008
12.
ConettaR.ShieldB.DockrellJ.ConnellyD., A preliminary survey of noise levels in UK secondary schools, Proc IoA32(3), Ghent 2010.
13.
DockrellJ.ConnellyD.ConettaR.ShieldB.CoxT., Secondary schools students' perceptions of their acoustic environment. Results of pilot research in English secondary schools, Proc IoA32(3), Ghent 2010.
14.
ZepidouG.DanceS.HassanS., A longitudinal study of hearing loss amongst Classical musicians, Proc IoA32(3), Ghent 2010.
15.
ZepidouG.DanceS., Novel noise monitoring and noise control solutions for the mitigation of excessive noise exposure of classical musicians. Proc. Euronoise 2009, Edinburgh.
16.
ZepidouG.DanceS., An orchestra's noise exposure, Proc IoA32(3), Ghent 2010.
17.
DanceS.ZepidouG.NestorasC., Improving the acoustics for classical musicians, Proc ICA, Sydney 2010.
18.
DanceS.ZepidouG.BackusB.WilliamonA., Hearing and the noise of performance: Solutions for sound monitoring, Proc International Symposium on Performance Science, pp. 459, 2009.
19.
DanceS.LorenzettoR., A new type of absorber for use by classical musicians in rehearsal rooms, Proc. Euronoise 2009, Edinburgh.
20.
DanceS.LivianiL.HassanS., Urbines – Roof top urban wind turbines- A comparison between horizontal and vertical axis designs, Proc. Euronoise 2009, Edinburgh.
KaymakE.AthertonM.RotterK.MillarB., Dental Drill Noise Reduction Using a Combination of Active Noise Control, Passive Noise Control and Adaptive Filtering, Proc Inter-Noise2007, Istanbul.